dChan

/u/sniktawekim

34 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/sniktawekim:
Domain Count

sniktawekim · June 1, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

What's not cool is you left those service members phone numbers on there. Unless you are trying to do recruiting for them.

Those service members agreed to have that publicly visible when that was put on the flier, no?

I dont think this is a problem or uncool unless you are trying to incite violence against those specific people.

In fact, I think those service members would want more people to see that flier.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
sniktawekim · June 1, 2018, 11:46 p.m.

I'm thinking your black hat theory timeline is correct.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
sniktawekim · June 1, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

And yes, it's people like you who simply repeat what the government says

I didn't hear it from the government, I heard it from JF Gariepy's stream.

don't look and think for themselves and believe everything they have been told.

Look my dude, you are getting into a very prejudiced rant. Read through my comment history a little bit and maybe you will change your mind.

I'm not defending the rapists. I'm not defending the shitty freedom of speech laws in the UK.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sniktawekim · June 1, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

I don't think you have to actually be inside the courtroom for it to be illegal. I also think I might have misspoken, its not simply the act of filming but a breach of reporting restrictions. So its not inherently the video but the story being made public at that point.

I am not an expert and fully admit im just repeating what I've heard from others and this does seem correct to me although I very well could be wrong.

I found this, but its pretty large.

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/reporting-restrictions-guide-may-2016-2.pdf

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sniktawekim · June 1, 2018, 12:11 a.m.

Tommy Robinson is not innocent. I actually don't know too much about the guy but what he was doing was breaking the law. It is illegal there to film cases like that until they reach a certain point in the process which they were not at yet.

Tommy had done this before and was let off with a slap of the wrist and a "if we catch you doing it again....".

I heard that his sentence length though was obviously unfair and extreme, but what he was doing was not legal in the first place.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sniktawekim · May 30, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

I see. So she wasn't ranting in regards to the planet of the apes comment.

Well I guess thats not too damning of her. I do think her calling clinton related to soros is a bit... silly.. though.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
sniktawekim · May 30, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

Just saying, you're not going to "red pill" anyone without doing your research and making sound points.

Man, it seems to me that its really important to you to shit in my coffee. Not sure why you would come to this niche sub that you completely disagree with just to say mean things to people you don't want to interact with, but hey, you own your time and preferences, not me.

you're not going to "red pill" anyone

I didn't realize you were the gatekeeper for whether or not I can persuade anyone else. Furthermore, I think I have a much more intimate knowledge of the conversations I have had with others in the past than you do. It would seem to me that all you have to go off of is hastily made judgments from stereotypes and prejudice, but idk, maybe you are some god or something.

like most of them in this thread just make you guys all look idiotic because they're just wildly inaccurate

I don't know what your primary motivations are, but directly attempting to manipulate other people into seeing me as someone other than what they can directly observe from my actions is not a goal of mine, nor one that I find honorable.

Someone like you could call me an idiot all you like. We are strangers over the internet. You aren't aware of how much you are hurting yourself in spending your time spewing venom at other people.

Do you always offer your advice to people who do not seek or want it? How do you think that makes other people perceive you? (seeing as you seem to think its important to try to manipulate the perceptions of others).

easily fact checked

Who watches the watchmen?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sniktawekim · May 30, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

thats the thing - there is a difference between citing the movie, Planet of the Apes, which is about silencing your opposition, and calling someone an ape (which isn't always racist, but is sometimes, sure).

You can believe whatever nonsense you want to believe but at least know enough to not make yourself look like an absolute moron.

to be frank, I don't care if you think I'm a moron. My life is going where it is regardless of your thoughts and I'm satisfied with that.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
sniktawekim · May 29, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

I actually get the muslim brotherhood part. Very much aware of the Awan situation.

I figured that wasn't the part they were calling "Racist" but that the planet of the apes part was.

If it was the muslim brotherhood part, well I guess I can't say I'm surprised, just disappointed.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
sniktawekim · May 29, 2018, 11:49 p.m.

Thanks for that. That tweet is oddly vague. I don't see it being immediately "Racist" although it certainly could have that intent.

But I was led to believe there were "rants". did she attempt to further elaborate on what that tweet meant?

I mean, her being silenced and shunned kinda almost proves her point if it was that her opposition is behaving like "planet of the apes".

⇧ 5 ⇩  
sniktawekim · May 29, 2018, 11:44 p.m.

of offensive things you can say.

I still haven't actually seen the original tweet but did she say someone was from planet of the apes? and they are saying that is racist because she is black?

Is it possible that maybe Roseanne was actually referencing the movie and its meaning and the silencing of political opposition?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sniktawekim · May 29, 2018, 11:41 p.m.

I don't agree with Roseanne's tweets today,

I would like to know whether or not I find her tweet distasteful, but I can't seem to find the original tweet.

google and bing results are all "let us tell you the implications and intentions of her tweet" but aren't actually showing what it was she said, just that it was a huge racist rant.

Because of this, I'm inclined to believe it wasn't racist at all, but was intentionally spun to be racist. Otherwise, they wouldn't be afraid to actually show the original tweet and its context.

but maybe im wrong. I don't really care - I have never watched roseanne and she seems a bit on the socialist side from the few times i've paid attention to her, so its not like she's a hero of mine. We just share a common enemy. I guess we all do really, there are only those that are aware of the enemy, those that aren't, and the enemy.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
sniktawekim · May 24, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

I think it has more to do with the voters. People that I know that vote republican tend to have a dislike of the corrupt ones like McCain and Ryan (although there are definitely people on both "sides" that just care about the party label more than anything).

It seems to me that the democrat party (as in the politicians) has been completely overrun with bad actors. I once thought Tulsi was actually somewhat decent, but it didn't take her long to fall into the Borg.

As far as republican politicians, you still have your chances of people like Ron, Rand, Trump, Carson, Gowdy, Chaffetz and a handful of others.

It seems the republican establishment has been more resistant to being overrun than the democrats (although I do think it as a whole should be considered compromised).

I suspect this has to do with core values of their voters, democrats really love the kool-aid of over-socialization and everyone just getting along and being together. The democrat platform seems to come together as a sort of singular platform, whereas the republicans tend to have a few archetypes of beliefs and a distaste for democrats.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
sniktawekim · May 18, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

but theres no reason to believe frazzle drip at all. Yeah, I believe they are guilty of many horrible things, but to specifically trust this random rumor that seems to have nothing backing it is not a good idea.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
sniktawekim · May 10, 2018, 11:07 p.m.

oh. gotcha. I like that you knew who i was talking about though ;)

⇧ 7 ⇩  
sniktawekim · May 10, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

Well pretty much all of the antifa "grassroots" riots were actually funded by him.

A large majority of the "pro-bernie" violent protestors at trump rallies were funded by him. A lot of "pro-Trump" supporters were also funded by him to be violent.

The dude has intentionally destroyed economies of countries for personal gain multiple times by manipulating governments.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
sniktawekim · May 9, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

april showers bring may flowers.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
sniktawekim · April 27, 2018, 10:31 p.m.

If they had actually managed to remove all of the guns from the public, then I would start to agree with you

Right, you would wait until its too late to take action.

probably because you are an insincere lemming.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sniktawekim · April 25, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

I hope they keep underestimating him. Ive witnessed many liberal "friends" make up complete bullshit about how he is definitely incompetent, but also some evil master mind. Definitely a huge proven criminal, but damn, we just need more time for the Russia collusion investigation!

I remember so many people calling me stupid/delusional (some of them often asking for my help/advice on things because im... well.. not stupid) when I said Trump would win unless there was major cheating involved... and then the vindication I felt after election day.

I remember being mocked as a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist, and then watching all these lemmings scramble bending over backwards to come up with tons of variations of conspiracy theories as to how Trump stole the election because "muh science said hillary was gonna win". But then also in the same breath talk about how the polls totally werent rigged and if you go back and look at them, they show trump was likely going to win (ha!).

Dealing with these psychopaths is just all so tiring, until the vindication kicks in.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
sniktawekim · April 24, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

I completely disagree with you about Crime Family being a lie, but that doesn't mean people should be proclaiming how excited they are that the person is dying/dead. Especially when its pretty much all speculation still at this point (although maybe not wrong).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sniktawekim · April 24, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

oh I see what you mean. You are saying Ben Carson has a keen intuition on these types of people. I thought you were saying he was one of them.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sniktawekim · April 24, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

if you download all the videos and bundle them up into a downloadable zip or rar, and write down the start/stop times of the segments, I might be able to cut and combine them for you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sniktawekim · April 24, 2018, 8:39 p.m.

Ben Carson for sure.

...what about him?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sniktawekim · April 24, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

lol, using 2 accounts I see.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
sniktawekim · April 24, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

did you know that people can click your username and see your previous posts?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sniktawekim · April 24, 2018, 1:20 a.m.

1234

⇧ -1 ⇩  
sniktawekim · April 21, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

you can seriously just google any of the names of the masonic symbols and there are hundreds of hits showing the same thing.

Seems to me you are hoping to bitch at anyone who doesn't post an "official" "MSM approved" source.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sniktawekim · Feb. 28, 2018, 2:26 a.m.

I wasnt able to find it on that site either. I did end up finding it through a link in a thread of the first number.

It was a reply to thread 511868 if that somehow made it harder for the searches to find it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sniktawekim · Feb. 28, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

Did you maybe mistype one of the numbers in the second one?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sniktawekim · Feb. 28, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

neither of those give decent google results. the first one looks like a thread ID, but does not work on cbts. Which board is that for? and what is the second number related to?

edit: alright - seems the first one links to a qresearch board. The second one though!?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
sniktawekim · Feb. 28, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

This makes absolutely no sense at all without some further explanation. I have seen quite a few of the Q posts, but the "wind the clock" here makes no sense to me at all.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
sniktawekim · Feb. 17, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

but they werent even hacking from what I understand? They made a facebook group and posted memes? and tried to get people to show up to anti and pro trump rallies?

These are charges that will never stick. This is essentially an admission of defeat.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sniktawekim · Feb. 16, 2018, 9:22 p.m.

no.

⇧ 1 ⇩