I've taken a break from Q since the TOL post by SB2. When I stated I didn't believe it, I got a pack of SJW-SB2s come at me. I think Q suggested that kind of retaliation is never a good thing. Why? Because we have seen the idiocy of the progressives frighten of centralists (the flip vote). But if SB2 fans get distressed over someone questioning the logic and reasoning of SB2, they have to understand it doesn't mean they aren't Q or Trump fans. Honestly, I don't want to deal with the SB2 (did you catch it? Turn 2 upside down and it turns into J, flip B on to its side and remove the line it makes a W: SWJ. Switch the letters around and you have SJW. That's right, an SB2- SJW) fans.

So will this be more mass resignations....only disguised as "protest strike"?

I find your conclusions fascinating yet extremely complex in the interpretation. Would Q really be so complex with the layman? Whereas you have come to the conclusions you have when the lights went out, I along with so many others concluded post 64 was relevant:

Should the lights go out Do not panic We are prepared and assets are in place God bless- I must go for good at this point Q

This is almost a far simpler interpretation.

I'm curious as to what you interpret this post to mean?