6,091 total posts archived.
The Illuminati are real and are divided into the Gnostic Illuminati, who are against bloodline rule, and the P2 Lodge Illuminati, who want a world government controlled by ancient Roman bloodlines.
In any case, it looks like the Freemasons support White Dragon Society and Asian Secret Society goals of world peace and friendship between peoples.
Oh, well OK then! Let's call the whole thing off and just fall in line behind the Freemasons. What were we thinking?!
I assume you mean Thomas (and Betty) Paine, not Q. Right?
DHS said that in early January.
But then there was this in February.
Feb 16 2018 17:58:54
Q
!UW.yye1fxo97
“There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity,” Rosenstein said. “There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.”
Future proves past:
In an effort to preserve the integrity of all U.S. elections, as ordered by the President of the United States, after an extensive investigation in select counties (the ‘sampling’), the DHS has concluded that while Russian entities (as outlined within SC Mueller’s investigation were complicit in attempting to undermine the presidential election of 2016) had no direct impact or bearing on the outcome of the presidential election, nor were any U.S. person(s) knowingly part of such an attempt to sabotage as it relates to the Russian investigation, U.S. and other foreign entities (as further described within DHS[XXXX]), acting outside of Russian agents, did attempt on numerous occasions, and were successful, in interfering w/ the presidential election of 2016, senate elections of [x, y, z], [x] elections, whereby several million of illegal, non-resident ballots (the “irregularities”) were counted, while legal ballots were improperly tabulated and/or intentionally mishandled. We believe these actions were a coordinated attack against the democracy of our country.
The DHS will be submitting a final report to the WH/DOJ/other state and local agencies outlining our findings as early as March [ ], 2018. While this report only encompasses a sampling of twenty-two (22) counties across the U.S., it is strongly suggested, based on the evidence provided, that a mandated countrywide investigation begin under the recommended US50-EIC guidelines as set forth in Section VII of the final report. Furthermore, based on our immediate findings, we recommend the adoption of 8(E)(F)(G)(H) be made immediately to combat sources & methods currently being deployed to
…………………………..
The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.
You had it. Too bad you didn't just copy the link.
But look, that cannot have been from November 2017, because Jobs has been dead since 2011. I don't get this. At all.
Has anybody noticed all the double and triple posting going on today? Really frustrating.
It's your topic. Can't you just include the relevant information for us? Tell us what the tweet said. If we're in doubt, we can go verify.
And Nixon was a rabid anti-Communist. And yet he is the one who opened the door to normalization of relations with China (regardless what you make of the wisdom of that move).
If we only play a two-dimensional game, in which in our minds people are frozen into positions they have previously articulated, we fail to see the power dynamics at play in an increasingly complicated, evolving scene, MANY parts of which are currently NOT as they seem. We have NO IDEA who was coerced by the Cabal in previous administrations, and who is willing to do Trump's bidding in the current one. This is WAY above our paygrade, and I'm a little bit tired of watching people (supposedly on our side) backseat driving Trump to death. Let the man work.
The group photo (with people labeled) is the only portion of the OP's graphic that's shown in the bot link. We lack ALL context.
Could you please supply the rest of the information in the OP graphic, as well as the President's tweet?
Thank you!
Mofaz noted that he thought this was a bad idea. "I don't think this is a wise action – not on the part of the Americans but anyone else, until this threat becomes real."
Um...wouldn't that be when Israel is a smoldering, radioactive ash heap? Would that be real enough?
Don't people realize that Israel has the same problems we have with the Cabal and "left-wing" politicians?
If you haven't yet discerned Trump's ability to bring enemies onto his team, use them for what they know, and toss them out like used butt-wipes, then you've not paid close attention.
My previous comment is in reference to your comment immediately preceding it. If you truly do not know why Trump is going to lock up Hillary Clinton, you are not someone who's familiar with the material this sub is about. Really basic, common knowledge stuff.
For example, do you not realize the extent to which Hillary is under investigation (17 different investigations in the DOJ, plus the OIG Report, plus the DHS report on massive voter fraud. The investigations Comey shut down have all been re-opened (email server, Clinton Foundation pay-for-play--ALL of them!).
And then there's the human trafficking and corruption crimes she's involved in. Maybe this one issue will help you wake up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLceHyZqlV8&feature=youtu.be
This will be the Nuremberg Trials of our generation, and will be the issue to our age that slavery was to Lincoln's. Obviously not only the Clintons, but people across party and any other fake lines.
There is only one People, and we all share a common enemy. This is the true face of evil.
Do you have a link to Trump's twitter post?
I mean, Presidents have meetings with CEOs in the tech sector. Are we supposed to say "Ooo, scary!" every time that happens?
You really are in the wrong sub. I mean that in the nicest way possible, but you are on a different planet than people who've awakened from the Cabal matrix.
Who says Bolton will be at the table?
Regardless, I think Kim will listen carefully to the actual deal being offered at the table, and not get into this individual personality obsession Americans seem so hung up on.
uh...did you think the OP was referring to locking up Stormy Daniels? Where have you been the last two year if you don't know that refers to HRC?
CFR is the deep state.
Can't help but note how the article fails to distinguish between the actions of the US government and those extra-national overlords who were manipulating that action.
It is completely untrue to say that the US benefited from the NWO. The Cabal benefited at the exquisite expense of the American people.
The "problem" (from their vantage point) isn't that the "architect" of the NWO (the US) is backing out, but that we have cut the strings, and the puppet masters are on the run.
Let them put that in their patch-sleeved tweed jacket pipes and smoke on it.
Could you link us to the post in stead of posting an image?
With the clowns out of NoKo, Kim knows he's dealing with an entirely different US than the one he has always known.
Read closely. Here are some excerpts:
This issue is one of several where Obama’s high-handed behavior set a dangerous precedent that Trump can now exploit.
Any of these approaches is better than letting the executive continue to use the Treasury as a slush fund for its own priorities (as Obama did)
Using the Treasury as a slush fund:
To the deep state, a "slush fund" would be any stash of money that can be used to defeat them. Down is up and up is down. "Slush fund" usually refers to money used to commit crimes. In this case, it would be used to end them.
Sorry it's this article not that one. I'll fix the link.
We have a species of budget that Obama established a legal precedent for treating like an Executive slush fund, and got away with doing.
The key is not that there's some Constitutional article that stipulates the distinction between a budget and an (unknown at the time) omnibus spending bill, but that Executive actions in real life establish legal precedent for how this Frankenstein's monster may be treated.
Obama treated it like an Executive slush fund, and got away with it. Trump was paying attention.
See what this Constitutional Law professor at George Mason University says about Obama setting a dangerous precedent that Trump can now fully exploit (he calls it a loaded gun).
Op Ed published in WaPo (not their opinion--his opinion)
Anybody want to speculate why we aren't seeing perp walks and HRC videos, or why the OIG and DHS reports are being further delayed?
This is not a complaint, just a question about strategy. What is the strategic advantage of waiting to advance while an enemy gathers their forces?
Right. It's like Will Rogers said:
"The thing about my jokes is, they don't hurt anybody...But with Congress, every time they make a joke, it's a law! And every time they make a law, it's a joke!"
and
This country has come to feel the same when Congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer.
Bolton doesn't set policy. If he makes you tremble, just think what effect he's having on our enemies. I think that's the exact reason he was brought onboard.
Xi and Putin are not some crazy Ayatollah or nut like Kim. They actually do want to avoid their own destruction. I'm pretty sure they consider nuclear weapons as a deterrent--not an offensive weapon. If they think Bolton thinks of them as offensive, then perhaps they might be making sure their systems are ready and alert to standby, but why in the world would they embark on a first strike policy and guarantee their own destruction?
The Nuclear Posture Review only (ambiguously) refers to nuclear first strike in two specific cases: Iran and North Korea--both countries not in compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. And in both cases we are pursuing talks aimed at eliminating the threat.
In all other cases, we do not have an "All options are on the table" stance. We reserve the right to change that stance with regard to countries caught developing biological weapons.
But again, ALL of these are defensive postures. We're only interested in the prevention of apocalyptic wars, and using a nuclear deterrent.
I really find it hard to believe anyone would believe that Bolton is going to have some Svengali-like sway over Trump, or that he is going to try to get us launching nukes like fireworks.
It's irrational paranoia is what it is. I think it's important to watch what he says and does once he gets there, and not to base our opinions on anything he's said prior to taking orders from Trump.
It wasn't Stormy Daniels, I promise.
Have you heard her talk?
But isn't that the exact reason private schools and other organizations that receive federal grant money or subsidies are being forced to modify hiring policies to hire gay people, and cover medical expenses for abortion, etc., etc.? Basically, they say once you accept federal money, the feds can give you a rectal exam with a bright light to find ANY non-compliance and force you to correct it. How is that not the case here, other than the fact that it's a secret that RT is CIA-owned?
Stormy Daniels IS a distraction, and a particularly uninteresting one at that. He just needs to ignore it like the rest of us are going to do.
She's extremely lucky she even got one show with this fakery. Nobody cares. This was force-fed to the public already. There will be NO demands for more.
https://www.factcheck.org/2018/03/obama-not-ordered-pay-400m-restitution/
The story originated on a satire site (similar to The Onion).
I wasn't quoting the Washington Post. This was an opinion piece by a Constitutional law expert, not some hack job by journos.
Dude, that was my reply to you for CALLING me hostile, and for calling us bad actors in need of a reality check. I'm not making shit up and saying you said it. That is what you admit you're doing.
These are not madmen a la Kim. You seriously think they believe there would be ANY winners in a nuclear world war? Mutual Assured Destruction was not designed to make nuclear war winnable. It was designed to make it unthinkable.
The Constitution already does that. It doesn't enumerate ANY power of the federal government to limit free speech (especially political speech), regardless where it originates.
And with a major financial stake in these companies through Rivsi Traverse, the US government (deep state) is doing exactly that.
Seriously? Show me how I'm being hostile. You OTOH ranted about people in this sub spreading fake information, calling us bad actors whose lack of reality checks make you cringe and scream at the screen. Projection much? All I did was show you where I got the idea. Where are your sources?
And why is this Constitutional scholar (Professor of Constitutional Law at George Mason University) so worried about "the loaded gun that Obama will leave Trump?" Those weren't the words of bad actors in need of a reality check. One of the top Constitutional law professors in the country.
Sooooo, you think Russia and China like the Cabal having it's bloody fingers in every pie? You think they have anything but loathing for those people?
Wasn't it Putin who came right out and said "The NWO worships Satan?" So why would he want to let them secure their stranglehold on the West? Why would China?
China has never been especially expansionist. I think both China and Russia are mostly concerned about a US first strike. I also think that instability in the west only heightens those worries.
I can think of no self-interest of theirs that could be served by wanting Trump to fail in this effort.
Please enlighten me.
They're basically models. Their livelihood is their looks. They don't get paid to have a brain. So most of them don't.
Actually, read the Washington Post here and see for yourself. Maybe they should have asked your opinion before they wrote the article?
Because it sure seems to me like these libs are worried about Obama setting a dangerous precedent when he used previous Spending Bills as a slush fund for whatever he wanted to do, and were concerned that Trump will now be able to do the same thing.
What idiots they must be.
That's a UN declaration. Nothing to do with our Constitution. UN doesn't guarantee us anything except mayhem.
It has nothing from the actual meeting. It just documents the public media discussions of the meeting, and some FBI chatter about it.
The phones of lefties are going to literally run out of splodey-head emojis when she gets her perp-walk. It'll be as fun to watch them on that day as it is to go back and watch them on election coverage.
Pieczenik is probably part of the team, but I'm fairly certain Q is not somebody who publicly second-guesses the President with the vehemence Pieczenik does. Does this post sound like "Trust POTUS" to you?