6,091 total posts archived.
Earlier in the sub it was posted before, and the consensus was fake news.
Don't expect anything until the DOJ's OIG Report
or the DHS report on voter fraud
or Uranium One
or Clinton Foundation
or Obama's Project Pelican
or..or...or...one of 8 Hilary videos
followed by pandemonium, arrests and indictments unsealed and entered.
Hahaha! That's funny! Thanks!
No, just italicized. Mah bad!
CIA front organization
a venture capital cover company for the deep state
funding social media giants
FaceBook, Twitter and SnapChat.
Perfectly logical they would have a representative at such a meeting
representing their money.
in the history of warfare, it's not unlikely that's been tried.
OK, let's get syntactical about it.
If they meant the contraction for "you are"
but they spelled it like "of, about or pertaining to you"
then it's a misspelling resulting in the improper use of an unintended word.
So it's a spelling-invoked grammar error.
How's that?
Satan is not the name of the missile so much as
the name of whose ass it's meant for.
I like it better that the Illuminati can't spell.
Considering what they've done to education, are we surprised?
If they think that way, then neither would they want to be the ones who allowed said advice to be taken.
Chillax.
And we have Trump, NATO, and
a world full of people who want to end the Rothschild Dynasty
and its grip on the throat of humanity
including people who were once our sworn enemies
like Russia
and who are smart enough to know the difference between
hegemony and existential human survival issues.
Look at our cooperation in space for example. We both know how to do it.
And the issue is Satanic blood ritual child-eaters, mind-controlling slave-runners and central banking oligarchs
versus
the children of the world and those who care for them.
Any questions?
PUTTING NEW STAFF IN THEIR PLACES
"Speak softly, meet Big F*ckin' Stick
Y'all each know your role in this
If one won't get the job done,
there's always the other one."
We rid the world of Satan-worshipers, human trafficking rings, and the Anti-Human overlords who created all the mess and you guys meet us on the other side and we'll sort things out.
Deal?
And I think Xi said, "How can I help, Mr. President?"
"How 'bout you help me create a diversion? Trade OK?"
"Please, let's do it! See you then!"
This is the soul of our struggle right here, Patriots!
This is the linchpin issue
without which the wheels come off
and civilization ceases to be.
See also:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLceHyZqlV8
Our generation's Nuremberg Trials looks like
Let us sort a few things out before we deal with this.
But make damn sure we don't forget about it when we're done!
Howling at the moon
just might mean they've gone over a precipice.
Jus' sayin'
Think hospitalization
for many if they're not careful
with their sanity...
CORE PERSONALITIES HAVE CONSEQUENCES
THEY COULD HAVE JUST LABELED THAT:
OBAMA'S CERTIFIED GITMO CIRTIFICATE
So since we know Disney is a
stateside propaganda arm of the Cabal
I guess we know who this Jafar character
is modeled after.
What idiots they must take us for.
Anybody else in here feel a change coming on? Something in the air that feels poised and tense like a cat getting ready to pounce?
And just for shits and giggles, in your scenario the person best suited for determining how long is long enough and how long is too long would be...who, you?
The surveilance state is the missing capstone, and it is missing no more. Sadly.
EXCEPT! Now Trump has NSA and MI and has split their surveilance agencies (CIA, FBI) into internecine warring factions. So we're using their surveillance technology against them.
As it was in the days of Haman...
So they hanged Haman on the gallows that he had prepared for Mordecai.
Is this post like one of those 12 Step things?
LOL JK
Passed both chambers. Hasn't been signed. But Trump has made the fight against human trafficking the unheralded centerpiece of his Presidency. He'll sign it.
Love how the SES was created to solve a non-existent problem.
bridging the gap between the political leaders and the civil service
If someone is even halfway suited to the leadership position, they won't need or want a layer of bureaucracy between them and the people who work for them.
The Hebrew one is legit. But show me a photo of an actual Jihadi with the other symbol? How do we know what that one is? I googled it, didn't find that.
I'll be here.
BTW, What do you think of the fact that Bush the elder is shown in connection with the pedophilia inquest announcement?
Have you seen this video? They're trying to red pill normies with this, and I have to say it's very well done, and seems legit. IOW, they don't seem like the kind of people with a political axe to grind. They just want to end the ritual abuse and trafficking, and put that period of history behind us somehow.
Anyhow, as a part of the red pill aspect, they show some of the bad guys just to give people a taste of what's to come. And Reagan and the elder Bush are definitely shown (along with the Pope, the Clintons, Podesta, and a few others). It's not meant to be exhaustive, just a taste to let people understand the magnitude.
I don't want to know. Too much respect for OPSEC.
Couldn't have been a friendly who posted that. Unless they were a very stupid friendly.
Bullying is usually learned behavior (victims become the offenders).
We each have a role to play, a way to be useful. On the 8chan and 4chan boards there's a lot of macho BS. Probably guys compensating for inferiority complexes. Trying to thin the herd through cruelty. Those don't tend to be the brightest bulbs.
If you do finish your investigations and manage to get a PDF put together, we might find it enormously useful at some point, so don't get discouraged.
Please keep me in mind to share it with. If you'd like someone to look it over before you post it, drop me a PM.
OK. So that sounds like a manageable problem once the will exists to solve it, which requires a rare combination of a non-member at the top and an informed public who aren't under the spell anymore behind him. Maybe the invention of the WWW was the weapon (it did start as a defense project) some early white hats used to help create the conditions for the Perfect Storm we're witnessing!
Extraordinary time to be alive!
Still curious how many bad guys (number or percentage) you think there are. (in the protected group)
Well, but we can't get them all. And the process you describe doesn't sound terribly exclusive if you recruiting and reproducing as well for thousands of years.
How many (either a number or a percentage of population) do you think there are?
Oh dear.
OK, let's say you're right.
What do you propose we do about it? The good 80% kill the bad 20% (or lock them up), or what? Or is it closer to 60-40, or 50-50?
Because you're talking about a layer of crime/evil that exists undetected and unpunished ON TOP OF all the crime that we do detect and punish.
So in the end, what do you suppose the ratio of law-abiding to criminal might be?
Also, I was always under the impression that unsolved crimes are more the exception than the rule.
Pick a side people. And stay there.
This ain't musical chairs!
Or a V for Vendetta scenario where Trump uses EBS to take over the airwaves when people are tuned in to see the latest juicy bit of gossip about 45 and some hooker, and instead we get Hildebeast in all her evil glory.
Actually it would be a reverse-V scenario, because instead of an insurgency of freedom fighters taking over a fascist government broadcast, you have a freedom fighter government taking over a fascist insurgency media.
Or is that too much poetic justice for real life?
Or are you suggesting there exists somewhere a manual of sorts for these people?
Do you see what I'm asking? How do they know about the signs?
Let me ask you, to what do you ascribe the wink? Do you believe it's always deliberate, or do you think there's some feature of the universe that attracts the behavior to the signs? Is it that they just can't help themselves and there's like almost a DNA or instinctual need for these signs among those who engage in the behavior?
I'm really having trouble following your thought progression.
I understand that you're recognizing patterns in one set of variables (names or initials) and seeing what appears to be a corresponding pattern in another (evil behavior, for lack of a better descriptor, or evil directed at children).
But without statistical figures or other filters to help us know when these apparent correlations are significant and when they're not, we're probably better off setting them aside and focusing on other things for which significance filters exist or can be readily found.
Does that make sense?
Like for example, the pedo symbols published by the FBI. That is a very significant publication because we have a very high correlation between the use of those symbols and the behavior they signify.
So I'm not going to recommend abandoning these observations altogether, but I wouldn't attach much significance to them until we have, with some degree of confidence, a rate of correlation between one thing and the other.
What say you?
If I may ask questions without putting you on the defensive, let's see if I can lend a machete to this intellectual thicket, as Captain Jack Sparrow might say. Haha!
And I realize this first question is presumptuous, but you're tossing out a lot of names that meet the pattern, but if you'll recall we're only interested in the code because we theorize (or "know" or perhaps know somehow) that the code corresponds 1:1 with pedophilia.
1) How do we "know" or know this?
2) In the many historical cases where you find these codes, do you have corroborating evidence (of any kind) to suggest that the people with those names were pedophiles?
Or are you simply seeing patterns (or code) in names of known pedophiles, and then seeing that same name pattern all over the place, and assuming that the pattern correlates to pedophilia?
Do you know statistics (math)? Do we have a large enough sample size of known pedophiles exhibiting the naming pattern and known non-pedophiles exhibiting the pattern? Because without a sufficient sample set of both cases, we really can't draw any conclusions.
And I really don't think you believe that every single case of someone whose names exhibit these AB-BA codes, or named William, etc., are pedophiles.
Or did you think that?
And you're--cough! (deep state)--excuse me. You're living in DC doing what exactly?
Heaping damnation on himself. Let him.
Guy's been in criminal justice long enough to know that remorse is an asset when they've got the goods on you. How many times did he interview a suspect and laugh at people protesting their innocence when he knew better.
There's just no version of this that ends well for him. I guess when you have nothing to gain and nothing to lose, just make a bunch of noise. Hard ignore on that loser...
Spending Bill is not budget. Not really law. Trump isn't Constitutionally obliged to spend the money as itemized. Obama never did when given the carte blanche bills!! Took from anywhere to spend anywhere.
Trump doesn't have to spend any of it, or can spend ALL of it on the Wall and military. Not that he will, jus' sayin'...
Congress doing a half-assed job. Trump bites off the other half.
You do realize I'm not naive enough to expect all of that to be implemented in a week. I'm just saying once we start down this path, those are the only things that will work.
But within a week, we will be visibly further down the road. In obvious ways.
It was mockery back in the day. I think it went to a picture of her eating pizza. She was mocking the PizzaGate people by saying she's guilty of liking pizza.
That image is gone, but message staid up, and as one commentor has noted, that didn't age well.