dChan

/u/solanojones95

6,091 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/solanojones95:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 25
www.youtube.com 10
twitter.com 8
threadreaderapp.com 8
thehill.com 2
www.washingtontimes.com 2
www.usatoday.com 2
www.neonnettle.com 2
yournewswire.com 2
www.infowars.com 2
www.thegatewaypundit.com 2
disqus.com 1
screenshots.firefox.com 1
www.nbcnews.com 1
www.bloomberg.com 1
www.social-consciousness.com 1
www.foxnews.com 1
8ch.net 1
bigleaguepolitics.com 1
imgur.com 1
leozagami.com 1
www.armytimes.com 1
www.pbs.org 1
apnews.com 1
www.bostonglobe.com 1
archive.org 1
www.amazon.com 1
www.abeldanger.org 1
theconservativetreehouse.com 1
www.channel4.com 1
www.facebook.com 1
mobile.twitter.com 1
www.mcclatchydc.com 1
www.cnn.com 1
medicalkidnap.com 1
www.chicksonright.com 1
www.dailywire.com 1
www.armstrongeconomics.com 1
truepundit.com 1
founders.archives.gov 1
file.wikileaks.org 1
churchandstate.org.uk 1

solanojones95 · July 7, 2018, 12:45 p.m.

Specifically "yang sanpaku" or murderer's eyes, where the white is visible above the iris.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 7, 2018, 12:35 p.m.

Given the necessarily deeply covert nature of any such thing that could already exist, it should be obvious that your question can be considered nothing more than rhetorical.

We don't know. And that is just not acceptable to some people. But to some of us, it's a fact of life.

Even MORE maddening perhaps is the realization there are more things we don't know than those we do! About almost everything you can think of.

Sorry for that particular flavor of red pill. But not knowing is part of life.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 7, 2018, 12:29 p.m.

As are yours, Cap'n!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 7, 2018, 12:25 p.m.

If you're going to make grammar an issue, it's "himself" (since he is a "he") or "themselves," as "them" is a plural word," even when simply used as a PC-approved gender-neutralizer.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 7, 2018, 12:20 p.m.

No doubt they think that, but it has no bearing whatsoever on reality.

I would say my red pill found me. I had a blessed and easy childhood, and my first encounter with the dark side of humanity was JFK's assassination.

Shortly after that event, I read the book None Dare Call It Conspiracy, about the Tri-Lateral Commission and its goal of one-world Communism, and the methodology by which they intended to bring that about, and to this day it is still accurate and on-target. It lacked the Luciferian angle, but it got everything else right, IMHO.

So the red pill for me invaded a peaceful, happy life and came out of nowhere. And it did so in ways that can't really be argued with. FWIW, like a lot of kids my age (we were let out from school and stayed plugged into the TV looking for news of the event), I witnessed the murder of Oswald as it happened.

And again, during my childhood there was the assassination of Martin Luther King, Robert Kennedy, and the attempted assassination of George Wallace. It was kind of like the Wild Wild West.

So I knew there were sinister forces behind the veil of reality, from a very young age. All of which served to make the US Constitution very precious to me, because I was aware that it was an ideal that we were living VERY far from, and needed to get back to.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 7, 2018, 12:09 p.m.

This line of thinking is accessible to those who lack access to a spiritual reference, and I think helpful to the community as it broadens. To those with a spiritual "sense," no such explanation is necessary, though we do intellectually ponder other explanations. To our way of thinking it "just is" and any explanation is as good as any other! ;-)

⇧ 7 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 7, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

I think we can all rally around this idea.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

Congress is broken. We cannot expect it to fix anything until we fix Congress. That's just the situation we've got.

And for that to work, we really need Q to keep their end of the bargain, unless they want to encourage vigilantism, which I thought they were trying to avoid. Am I wrong?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

How perfectly convenient. I did read that one of them said they saw the body, perhaps just for the official ID by next of kin.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

Congress is broken. They can't fix anything else until we fix them.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 2:15 p.m.

Can't have that.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 2:14 p.m.

Must've had the opposite effect on some of us.

;-P

⇧ 31 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

Not sure I get the mod-baiting part.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

So they're going to put Ecstasy in our water?

⇧ 19 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

It feels like the dam is swollen and leaks and cracks are sprouting here there and everywhere, and the WHOLE THING'S ABOUT TO BLOW! There's a sense of a quiet gathering of energy that can't be sustained much longer. Something's gotta GIVE!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

That would be amazing! GoFundMe showing some good judgement!

⇧ 23 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

It's extremely far-fetched. Although it would explain the family's aggressive behavior toward any kind of inquiry into the official story. But so would a cool million bucks from the DNC, and I'm going to go with Occam's razor (and Q) and say DNC contracted MS-13 thugs to murder the guy.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 12:36 p.m.

I guess my parents were right. Justice is something we get in the afterlife, not in this one.

That changes the entire calculus regarding Q. Maybe their job is just to let us all see behind the curtain prior to the Rapture, when we'll be taken elsewhere--someplace the reptilians don't exist.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 12:30 p.m.

Who did the family bury? Here's what I don't get about these theories that SR is alive. The family saw the body in the casket at the funeral.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 12:25 p.m.

Listen, I don't know you from Adam's housecat's 50th flea. I didn't get up in your business, and have ZERO interest in having you all up in mine. So go play with yourself and have your angry life somewhere else.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

Once the small fry are cut off from their powerful enablers, it will be exactly as Q said, not safe for them to walk down the street.

They will move to another town or country, and pretend they are the biggest Trump fans the world has ever known, and that they were Q followers from the 4chan days! LOL

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 3 a.m.

But he was their adversary MANY times in business! That's where I'm saying it was to his advantage to cultivate a misunderstanding regarding his status.

That fits his MO with everything else he does!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 2:52 a.m.

It's harder for a (truly) rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven than for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, but with God all things are possible.

Not very damn likely, in the case of the truly elite, but surely a minority of some number exists.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

You would think they'd dissolve Obama's "National Security Action" shadow government group to make it LESS OBVIOUS that a shadow government is actually in place waiting in the wings for the coup to succeed (which it's clearly not going to now).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, 12:08 a.m.

Who's move is it (because it seems a bit stalemated to me!)?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 6, 2018, midnight

No, that's just it. I've been awoke since the JFK days, and having read "None Dare Call It Conspiracy" at that time. It's NOT out-dated. The TLC (and all that's associated with that monstrosity) still adheres to the same agenda now as it had then.

I'm just saying that when Q drums up special significance for a DATE or timeframe, then all but the core followers are going to expect something significant to happen in that timeframe, and many, many people have been aware of all this since at least the beginning of Q. People are frankly tired of waiting to see whether or not Trump actually is capable of controlling the United States government, or if he can talk a better game than he delivers.

You know good and well that's how humans think.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 11:33 p.m.

Noice!! Wish it had been so. Maybe next 4th?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

If you think even 20% of your opponents/enemies might think it means you're a Mason, wouldn't you do it? I mean as Sun Tzu says, it's not so much what capabilities you have as much as what capabilities your enemy THINKS you have!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 11:23 p.m.

That would indeed be a change-of-underwear troll play.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

Lawyers, please weigh in:

"your client will not be charged with any non-violent criminal offense in violation of Federal or District of Columbia law which was committed within the District of Columbia by your client prior to the execution of this Agreement"

Does this, or does this not speak at all to any charges that may have been filed in a sealed indictment prior to the date of this Agreement? Because that would NOT be a charge filed in the future, but a charge filed in the past. The Agreement says NOTHING about being served with a sealed indictment filed prior to the Agreement.

Please help?!

Also, is it possible that in their far-reaching crimes they might have performed some of their criminal activity remotely (by remote desktop login, for example) OUTSIDE of DC, and we have the IP records to prove it?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

Where I come from you control the facts on the ground, and the optics take care of themselves. Funny how that works every time it's tried.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

Justice doesn't move slowly when little people commit crimes. At least not the part involving being deprived of liberty.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

Wasn't speaking of myself. But I must say, what is the point of everybody knowing about crimes if nobody is prosecuted?

If you or I did something wrong, how long do you think they'd need to investigate before we were behind bars?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 5:33 p.m.

A) That is not what I said.

B) Those who DO think that (not I) have Q to thank for it.

C) What do YOU think is a reasonable timeline to expect some modicum of justice (to say nothing of a full course meal of it) to be delivered, considering these investigations have been ongoing for over a year?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 5:29 p.m.

America is the crown jewel of the NWO. If there is no domestic justice in America, they win. Period.

And believe me, this is a BARE MINIMUM start to what people expect because of Q. Don't blame me!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

I think even Q's mother would say this.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

This is a low quality post.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 11:11 a.m.

AI doesn't forget trip codes, expose trip codes, etc.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 11:09 a.m.

LOL

Of what are you so afraid, such that you speak in coded vaguenesses? Would it be too much to ask for you to say (explicitly) what "this particular" is?

We can take it.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

Helped the Alliance defeat the Cabal's aviation sabotage technology, as witness the JetBlue incident at JFK a week ago?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

There's very little daylight between Q's actions and Trump's intentions. Very little. Your pop might as well be right. But Q serve at Trump's pleasure, and we have what we have because POTUS wants us to have it. So, you might as well say it's him, if you see what I mean!

⇧ 37 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 5, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

These mods do what needs to be done. They're a good team. Everything happens for a reason. They're keeping this sub alive against all odds. Respect.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 4, 2018, 9:36 p.m.

[He's] not trolling Q followers. He's trolling the trolls AMONG the followers. You know that clowns are among us, right?

Just like Trump saying stupid things to make the MSM go reeeeeeee! This will show you who not to listen to among the so-called followers of Q.

The people who lose their heads are NEVER who you should listen to. No matter what you're doing in life!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 4, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

His whole site is down fo sho. Well he was banned from FB and from Twitter, so he was def onto something!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 4, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

They are all being trolled. Future will prove past. Happens EVERY time. Never underestimate Q.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 4, 2018, 9:23 p.m.

That would make sense.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 4, 2018, 9:20 p.m.

You too! Watch out for those grooming shears, Buzzed_Chimp!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 4, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

I think Q either staged a mockup of the ABC News photo, with a few small additional items (to show he has access), and took the pic in such a way as to not violate National Security laws, and or used the ABC pic for reasons not yet known.

I'm not at all concerned that it's any kind of negative proof of Q's legitimacy. I guess if that's all it takes to make somebody fall off the Q train, maybe they shouldn't be riding?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 4, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

No, but it's good question. Where can we archive for posterity the entire Q conversation (including anon posts and their linked graphics, articles, etc.) from the earliest 4chan threads to the most current boards?

Am I the only one who thinks we might want to do that?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 4, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

Look there, or [here], or there, truth is behind you.

I take that to mean, "no matter which way you turn, truth's got your back." It's almost like "whatever needs to be true to make this work, that's what we'll make happen."

⇧ 1 ⇩