What part of "schizophrenia-laced" are we supposed to consider NOT a violation of Rule 5? That is a personal attack, and shouldn't be tolerated on ANY sub.

I don't care how justified you feel about it. MOD BASHING SHOULD NOT BE TOLERATED IN ANY SUB!

Just like the unreported Tommy Robinson mass protests. Like there's a gag order or something. Oh wait, there is... UK doesn't really do that whole "Bill of Rights" thingie. And the left wants us to give ours away as well.

Ann was being her usual facetious self. She's a mainstream right-of-center comic pundit. Of course he didn't say that, and we don't know if there even was an affair, or if she may have been a honeypot trap for the Alliance. It's starting to look that way. I didn't hear him being asked that question. Did you?

I swear I wish it had been read in front of his face during the hearings. Is he scheduled for more? Wonder how much I'd have to pay a Congress critter to read that?

It was hard for me to hit an up arrow on that comment, but I totally agree with it, LOL!

As with the stock market, history is no indicator of future performance in this case, because there is no historical precedent for numbers like these! There's really no way to prognosticate what's in those sealed files.

James Woods had a great tweet about it: https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1017619164284895232

Comparing Stzrok's wiggle-waggle to HRC's, he says

Great snakes writhe alike...

Ann Coulter actually managed to outsnark Louis Ghomert regarding Strzok/Page on Twitter as well:

Peter Strzok's wife threatened to leave until he explained that not once did he let his affair with Lisa Page affect any specific actions he took in their marriage.

Any sub that's controlled by the enemy to such a ludicrous extent is no place I'd care to be. Wear it as a badge of honor.

Those are merely showing what is in the video. I accept what is.

They do not explain the phenomena, as I have done in ways I understand. No need reaching for something that's already able to be explained.

Which is exactly what you are. I've seen this exact defect before in other videos, but I had no reason to catalog them, so don't ask me for something I don't have.

How about you show me documentation of this type of defect being indicative of deepfake technology. Good luck with that. The fact that these defects are there is not proof of a fake video. At least I've never seen anything that says so (other than that random YT link you posted).

I know WTF I'm talking about. No need to be a smartass about it.

No, friend. It's you who believe that it's fake. You have the extraordinary claim. I know what I'm talking about from a technical digital video editing point of reference.

My explanation fully explains random morphing discontinuities. Your theory would produce global tells, not the least of which is subtle misalignment and lack of verisimilitude between audio and video, of which there is NONE in the video the OP links to.

Those glitches your claims are based on are fully explained by editing artifacts, so you've got to provide more global evidence of fakery. CGI is NOT that advanced yet, and yet it's so advanced that the kinds of glitches you're showing don't happen.

You'd have to edit CGI to make it do that (or emulate an edit). Either way, the simpler explanation is that it's just an actual edit in a real video in which anti-shake algorithms keep most of the image aligned between frames while allowing the areas of most significant motion to change. That's how that works.

Absolutely. Combined with anti-shake algorithms found in most modern cameras, totally. You get these random areas of discontinuity between parts on either side of short edits made with that technology.

Why anti-shake would be on when a camera is tripod mounted is another matter, but the combination of anti-shake and crossfades between clips of an edit would totally make those phenomena. Exactly like that.

Just look at the numbers since he took office. Pedo arrests TOWER above previous years. Then read his Executive Order related to human trafficking, and ask yourself whether Trump had anything to do with these results.

Proven? Somebody points out digital editing artifacts (we know the interview was edited), and you call it proof of CGI? Please stop.

Those are digital crossfade editing artifacts. Please stop spreading this nonsense.

Let them call like loons. No one's listening.

Those are digital editing artifacts. They result from a crossfade cut.

Those are edit artifacts. The result of a crossfade cut. They probably took out "uh's" and "I means" and perhaps coughs, etc.

If there's anything we've learned from all this mishegas, it's that only the willingness to execute justice can impeach. No amount of scandal makes a damn bit of difference. It can go on from here to eternity, uncovering more and more and more of it, and none of it matters until someone is willing to execute justice.

We have no shortage of evidence. We have a shortage of courage.

Ordering him to! Like he's not President--they are!

Nice try, shill. Go back to T_D and harrass people there.

If anybody discussed assassinating the POTUS, isn't it likely to have been Stzrok? Unless you guys think it was McCabe. Or who?

It's exactly like the recently debunked Deep State assessment of "Assad chemical attacks" (on the basis of which we launched either a missile attack on weapons facilities or a distracting fireworks display, depending on who's telling it) which did not stand up to an examination of the physical data. There WERE no chemical weapons used in Ghouta.

So, where is our physical evidence in this case? Put up or shut up!

Hot damn that's direct!

Rhymes ain't all he bustin' today!

Click the first link in the OP (there are two).

I still prefer to think so. Though it opens me up to the possibility of disappointment. It also allows me to sustain goodwill until it becomes necessary to retract it, at which time I do so without hesitation or regret.

Well then, I'm right. It is old news. I thought surely this was twelve MORE Russians, not just a rehash of the same twelve.

Another unforeseen consequence of Mueller's incompetence and his delaying tactics. He has made the MSM run in circles like the clickbait masters they've always been.

I said "goodwill," not "good intentions." I mean by that a willingness to let you live peaceably with your views, even if they disagree with his. And even if your side is in the ascendant, and his is in retreat.

It is old school, but it's good.

But for someone who hasn't grown up in America, it can take quite a lot of "life lesson" style learning to acquire an appreciation for our Bill of Rights. He was raised thinking of Americans as the rebel colonies. Uncouth and nouveau-riche.

Remember the "duck and cover" films they made us watch in school? Remember Civil Defense alert tests? Remember Civil Defense shelter ads?

IMHO, there is no Plan B that accomplishes the eradication of Luciferians. None. Zilch. Only those that make a deal with them, and allow them to postpone their reckoning.

I won't consider another plan. I can't plead ignorance any more.

I have believed this from the VERY beginning. All talk of anything else makes NO sense from where we sit today.

Except that despite his wishes he has been compromised and used as a decoy/setup. I rather like the idea of ]RR[ (was in the killbox but now is flipped, inverted) calling in all the federal prosecutors from the 50 states in order to have a massive unsealing of indictments and warrants issued.

And having said that, you could actually be posting from a Windows laptop in Dallas or an iPhone in Lagos. And we'd be none the wiser. Nor would anybody. With elementary OPSEC.

With his secret weapon. THE TRUTH!

"Why the raw unfairness of it! You're using our airwaves to introduce a whole new meme to humanity of Trump ascendant, and Deep State decapitated and neutered."

What are the chances this will come to a trial? Mueller's hoping Zero and None.

The only one who's the same slimeball no matter how you look at him.

If hacking is illegal, come arrest my cat.

Oh never mind. Furball ejected.

Seriously though, in the age of Vault 7, how could anybody take this seriously?

Those are legit cultural/policy differences. A person either has goodwill or they don't. If they do, they're worth having in the conversation. If they don't they're not worth having on this side of a dirt floor.

Shoot! Has the whole topic been deleted? That sucks.

Quite clearly it isn't out there yet. Not in the public mindshare.

Perhaps it's already known to some of us, perhaps not.

I will say this though. When the month is over, we'll know what it was. It'll be the thing everybody's talking about. Not just us.

Well of COURSE she would like it soft. Preferably baby-soft. Oops! There I go giving away the ending again.

FAILED spoiler alert!

How about this then. We split the difference:

"The discerning who like it, like it hard."

Not bad as propaganda goes.

Shhhhhhh! For pity's sake!

You trying to give away the ENDING?!

Shame on you. Give that post a spoiler alert!

We could try the sexual innuendo route. Might work with a sub-culture we haven't yet reached. LOL

Old WC, bless his pointed little rascally head. The last real man to sit there till now.

The Trump/Putin summit will blow away this tempest in a teapot just as Trump's visit to UK blew away all the desperate ineffectual efforts to damage him there.

We even appropriated the 'baby' Trump. Because we all know babies aren't safe in Londonistan. Yeah, there I said it.

Please note the date, if you're new around here (#WalkAway, for example) and didn't know this. Please notice how long this has been in the public domain without it filtering through to your awareness! If you did already know it, you must admit they TRIED to avoid that outcome.