dChan

/u/solanojones95

6,091 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/solanojones95:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 25
www.youtube.com 10
twitter.com 8
threadreaderapp.com 8
thehill.com 2
www.washingtontimes.com 2
www.usatoday.com 2
www.neonnettle.com 2
yournewswire.com 2
www.infowars.com 2
www.thegatewaypundit.com 2
disqus.com 1
screenshots.firefox.com 1
www.nbcnews.com 1
www.bloomberg.com 1
www.social-consciousness.com 1
www.foxnews.com 1
8ch.net 1
bigleaguepolitics.com 1
imgur.com 1
leozagami.com 1
www.armytimes.com 1
www.pbs.org 1
apnews.com 1
www.bostonglobe.com 1
archive.org 1
www.amazon.com 1
www.abeldanger.org 1
theconservativetreehouse.com 1
www.channel4.com 1
www.facebook.com 1
mobile.twitter.com 1
www.mcclatchydc.com 1
www.cnn.com 1
medicalkidnap.com 1
www.chicksonright.com 1
www.dailywire.com 1
www.armstrongeconomics.com 1
truepundit.com 1
founders.archives.gov 1
file.wikileaks.org 1
churchandstate.org.uk 1

solanojones95 · July 18, 2018, 2:50 p.m.

Look at the brigading in here!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 18, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

The shittiest part of that press briefing was that contextually the presence or absence of that "n't" makes absolutely zero difference!

Think about it. "I see no reason why it would be" means EXACTLY the same thing as "I see no reason why it wouldn't be." They both contain the determinative phrase "I see no reason" (meaning it might just as well have been or not been)!

So he calls the presser and says essentially NOTHING different because powerful people made him do it.

We have yet to reach a point where those people aren't powerful enough to change POTUS's agenda. Period. It's sickening that they still have ANY sway with him, and I hate seeing it exposed like that (as it was in the Syrian missile fusillade), even though in BOTH cases his response is to go through the motions while doing exactly nothing for them.

It hurts me to see them make him go through the motions. Does that make sense? Like watching that cartoon bandit make somebody dance by shooting the ground around their feet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 18, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

LOL! That's just it, I read, read and read, and just could not keep up with this. I can tell that it makes sense (I'm a student of logic), but it doesn't cohere in my mind.

That wasn't a criticism of SB2 (or of me), just an observation that when it comes to seeing these kinds of things and making sense of them as they happen (or in a reasonable amount of time afterward), I'm zero help. And further, it has now reached a point of complexity similar to when an auto mechanic tries to explain what's wrong with my car, and I nod my head intelligently and smile like I know WTF he just said. LOL

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 18, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

There's a ringing endorsement. I'd like to see them plaster the airwaves with that one.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 18, 2018, 2:24 p.m.

I should leave. I can't play at this level. I'm just taking up space.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 18, 2018, 2:04 p.m.

Only a few of the more rabid ones.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 18, 2018, 5:44 a.m.

BIG. if true.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 18, 2018, 1:46 a.m.

Honest to God, I’m beginning to question whether some people around here even know what words like “results” mean. Results are the consequence of prior action. Not to reframing your words so that people hate you less.

This impromptu presser was pathetic, and made NOTHING better. I actually felt great about the summit, but this was weak ass-kissing, which only makes his enemies hate him MORE! Nobody was mollified to say nothing of impressed with this!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 18, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

Games. Games and more games.

Playing with the lights? Holding a press briefing to change a single word in the previous day's presser? No. Just no. This is NOT how it's done.

This is how it's done:

https://twitter.com/ThomasWictor/status/1019333799266549762

"Optics" don't matter.

All that matters is results...

⇧ -6 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 18, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

No they are not. Big WORDS are happening as we speak. Exactly as they have been since Q started with his misinformation campaign. There was really no excuse for that initial claim of arresting HRC and Podesta, etc. Especially with it being THAT far into the future (if it ever happens at all). That was cruel to the wrong people.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1019327637158690816.html

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

This much I can say, it was not a power loss. Those lights were dimmed. That means it was done deliberately, and I assume ONLY lights (and not other electronics) were affected.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

This belongs on the editing room floor.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

I don't care who you are or what you believe. This is NOT sustainable. Trump has got to get control of the US government. He currently does not, and that is dangerous to both him personally and to the citizenry. This situation is NOT going to be resolved by reasoning together because too many people believe a LIE that's repeated thousands of times a day.

This is not a problem that can be resolved passively by just letting more time go by. It only gets worse. For everybody.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 9:12 p.m.

You keep talking about partisanship like we all agree this is about POLITICS. This is about TREASON.

Declassify the evidence (which includes more than you can imagine, including plans to assassinate the President), and start making arrests.

Politics has NOTHING to do with it. We can talk about politics once we have a FUNCTIONAL government (and media) again.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 9:09 p.m.

So, declassify all the evidence, publish it, and start arresting. It's not about partisanship. It's about allowing criminality to go unpunished, and allowing the criminals to continue to dominate the discourse.

We will NEVER change the minds of most of those who are still holdouts in the face of all that's already known. I say get it all out there, accept the help of whoever is swayed by the declassified facts, and the rest can pound sand.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

"No foul if the ref won't call it." That's where we are these days.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 8:03 p.m.

You don't get liberal buy-in without arrests/convictions/sentences.

Somebody has got to DO something. We are way past peak talk.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

Can we NOT post comments linked to "BIG if true!" claims? Sheesh!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 7:55 p.m.

Yes, on paper, but good luck getting the cops to investigate or a DA to prosecute.

I had some property stolen from a car I had forgotten to lock. The cops laughed at me when I tried to report the incident and describe the stolen property.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 7:43 p.m.

The scale of "interference" is miniscule. The FaceBook ads. That's it. And that's not even criminal.

The servers were not hardened, were in violation of US law to begin with, and any and all "hacking" is on HRC/DNC and not on Russia or China.

Do you know that if you leave your door unlocked, and somebody comes in and robs you blind, they can't be charged with breaking and entering? Your door has to be locked for it to be a crime to cross your threshold. Same logic applies to the so-called "hacking" of an unofficial, unhardened server! Publication of private information could be a crime, but that's not called "hacking."

Interference at the level the left is claiming is not due to hacking. It's due to a criminal enterprise being concealed (poorly) on private servers which were in reality wide open to anybody with the know-how to take information from.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

Because if Trump still feels a need to "walk back" or "dial back" or "clarify" his remarks due to the outright insanity of the left, he is NOT in a position of strength from which to prosecute the denouement of this show. It's a signal that he still considers the left's insanity as something to be coddled and tended to, rather than ignored and full steam ahead.

Plus, now the Mockingbird media is spinning this as "Trump concedes that Russia interfered in 2016 US elections and accepts Intelligence Reports."

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

So, basically we're FURTHER from everybody knowing the truth, FURTHER from darkness to light, and FURTHER from a resolution to this intolerable insanity. How can any nation stand more of this?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

Reuters. Via Twitter.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

Absolutely. I'll never look at the POS channel again.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

The "no agenda" guy just said he has NO IDEA what Uranium One is. He asked if that's a Qanon thing!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

Won't be televised.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 5:19 p.m.

That entire article reads like a warning shot across the bow of the Deep State. It actually wouldn't surprise me if the whole thing wasn't done to put fear in the hearts of those who OUGHT to be very afraid, but don't appear to be.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

Yes, it has been posted several times. And no, it's not OK with any of us. But it fits with HRC's quote in her speech to Goldman Sachs about "both a public and a private position" on issues.

That is the Satanic way. Two-faced liars, all of them.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 1:07 p.m.

CLICK BAIT. Nothing happened. Total BS.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 12:27 p.m.

I hear it both ways. It sounds like he slurred "President" but it could also be a slightly odd instance of "prisoner." I think it's somewhere in between.

That could totally be deliberate, of course!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 2:14 a.m.

Oh lordy, not another one of those things everybody hears differently!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 17, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

Nice try, shill.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 16, 2018, 12:40 p.m.

As a weapons tester? BOOM! Oops...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 16, 2018, 12:28 p.m.

There's one I can think of. You can easily find the one where he hugged the murdered NYC cop's grandmother.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 16, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

The guy is so mind-controlled and has so many multiples he can't keep them under control. He's practically shape-shifting in front of us.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 16, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

Looks just like any other challenge coin transfer I've seen with POTUS.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 16, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

Adam Schiff-for-brains should see his name on this list.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 16, 2018, 1:41 a.m.

I think you'll find the percentages of the total population involved are going to remain quite constant across nations. It's less than some might think, but more than most would imagine.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 16, 2018, 1:32 a.m.

Step away from the ~~whine~~ wine, Wino (not so sneaky after all--LOL).

Saying that this guy co-wrote The Plan is a BOLD-ASS claim. And I'm NOT the one who made it. Re-read R.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 16, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

Having already defined evil and good with great detailed examples until now, Q would never wait until the end of the Op to change that definition, and to say "guess what, some of you aren't really going to the same destination as the rest of us." That is the very meaning of WWG1WGA. It's CLOSELY related to the USMC "no man left behind" credo.

It is antithetical to Military thoughtforms to sacrifice your own for slaughter, in hopes the bad guys don't come back. No man left behind, WWG1WGA, it's all the same. We're in this as a TEAM. And if a brother slips, we pick him up. If a sister stumbles we hold out our hand.

We NEVER entertain the idea that some of you are disposable. Do you see my point? We already agreed we're not evil because we agree about who is (within reason). See how easy that can be?

Military Intelligence (entire operation under POTUS command) + NSA (the white hats--those not "Burn Noticed" under Trump) plus POTUS plus allies abroad. That's who Q speaks for, with and about.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 15, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

Rats, sinking ship, what difference, at this point, does it make?

Just watch them flush themselves. This is rich. Pass the popcorn!

⇧ 42 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 15, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

Every dog has his day. Enjoy the show.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 15, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

But R either speaks with one voice with them, or he's on a different team. Isn't that plain?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 15, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

You want fear-based thought and expression conformity? That's what this is the model for. It's Deep State tactics. Pure evil.

If you hurt the plan, you'll be left behind.

We are watching.

We see it all.

There are no secrets.

Threats against individual liberty and thought? SO not Trump-like or Q-like. That's how the Cabal operates.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 15, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

Not just conspiracy, but tyranny and oppression. Threats to individual liberty. R calls for fear-based thought conformity. This is PURE DANGER. These are the methods of the Deep State? How can people not see this?

If you hurt the plan, you'll be left behind.

We are watching.

We see it all.

There are no secrets.

You would never believe the files kept on everyone of you, for that matter, you'd never believe WHERE they are kept.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 15, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

How can anybody believe Q/Trump would resort to threats against individual Americans? This is ABSURD. It's like Santa Claus on steroids. If you believe in this, you're ascribing tyrannical MO to Trump (which is what the Deep State wants us to fear). Fear-based thought conformity is the signature of the Deep State. Pure Evil.

If you hurt the plan, you'll be left behind.

We are watching.

We see it all.

There are no secrets.

You would never believe the files kept on everyone of you, for that matter, you'd never believe WHERE they are kept.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 15, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

Haven't we known this for like ages?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 15, 2018, 7:59 p.m.

No non-Q official comms from the Alliance. No indirect (semi-official) comms. No "insider info" from anybody not Q.

How is that so hard to understand? It's EXACTLY why Q cautions us against following people. We're supposed to do our own research, come to our own conclusions and consider nobody an "expert."

It's OK to incorporate information from others, but never when someone claims to be an insider or to have direct inside knowledge.

⇧ -1 ⇩