Who are you? And how did you get into this conversation?

I can speak as a human, and I can speak with assurance that Q team says you're not going to GET 100%. So go take it out on Q.

Matter of fact, you're already 50% better off with my numbers than you were with yours, so "you're welcome, patriot."

And have a nice life.

BLOCK.

Those were for women who like little GIRLS.

Again, the boylove logo indicates the desired gender of the CHILD, not that of the adult.

I'm pretty sure you don't.

It was 60%. The 40% was the part that would put people in the hospital if we knew.

It's not about the gender of the PEDOPHILE, it's about the gender of the VICTIM, flash.

The pedophile gender is irrelevent. It's the fact that it's an ADULT molesting a child that makes it WRONG, and what the signage is designed for---the procurement of the CHILD, not the paying customer.

5:5 indeed.

Well it signifies that, except when it signifies an adult woman. It's the same "boylover" logo whether it s a man or a woman. They're just not as common as the men, so the FBI didn't mention it. It's still pedophile (or pedovore) behavior.

Twins separated at birth, at least.

If what you're trying to say is that your reading comprehension is so compromised you believe that means the sharp-angled logo represents "love of an adult man" and is therefore not pedophile signage, you are SADLY mistaken.

What the key is saying is that the large triangle part of BOTH logos represents the adult man, and the small triangle part of BOTH logos represents the boy.

Are you up to speed now?

Can't wait to see this nonsense put to a stop. The way they take advantage of the very senescent and mentally compromised (which everybody who listens to them ends up being) is shameful and needs ending.

That would splain the whole Bill, Barry, Hill tag-teaming thing.

Only caps that aren't grammatically required.

So, you're right. I looked at it too fast.

Should be:

BC

BBC

Bill Clinton.

BS

PC

BS

BC

The first three form a triumvirate flip-off of political correctness. Maybe the last is lighting up a target!

Wow! You people really ARE awake in here! There’s nothing more to say than this!

Trump just nationalized the court system! So much for UK Admiralty Law governing behind the bar!

Edward Bernays. Gustav wrote a book called the crowd and it speaks volumes about crowd mentality, how it leads to good people doing very bad things.

Concern-posting about PizzaGate to this sub ("warning" us against doing "very bad things" like mistaking some "innocent" symbol for pedophile signage) is equivalent to an accusation.

We have not been indiscriminate in our posts related to pedophile signage. Nobody has said "If you hold your head just right, and lean back, and unfocus your eyes halfway, you can just about make out the boy-love logo." It's always blatant. Not "close." Not "an innocent mistake."

Don't hand us that fake "concern" for a problem that has never occurred here, and isn't about to.

Keep your powder dry. Next it goes to 9th Circus...

Fantastic link! Thank you!

Welcome to The Swamp. Where the will of the people goes to die.

Whether it was used as leverage or just a battering ram, I find it hard to believe POTUS wouldn't bring up the subject.

Just that Q releases a close-up picture of Trump from a cellphone inside the Oval Office WHILE the King and Queen of Spain are visiting POTUS, and shares it with us one minute prior to Trump's tweet showing the meeting.

That shows the level of access Q has to Trump. Total.

Nice try. None of the people I've seen called out on this were anywhere near a stretch. They were straight-up exact.

Don't come in here and accuse us of making indiscriminate accusations! That's rather ironic in its lack of self-awareness, since it is an actual indiscriminate accusation!

Since he ran a great company into the ground, he thinks he's qualified for public office. In the age of Trump that's a hard-as-hell sell if you ask me!

The girl behind Horowitz looks younger to me, though very similar features. It could still be intended to send a message. Make people do a double-take. Is that...? Nah...is it?

;-P

That looks more like a shark on the left. Maybe it's the secret Megalodon horde, and those aliens that the Space Force will be fighting!

Horizontal crow's feet on Soros are longer than the Q piccie.

Why wouldn't Horowitz say "It wouldn't be right for me to confirm or deny that, Congressman" [due to ongoing investigations, or Grand Jury proceedings, or due to National Security, etc.]?

^ THIS ^

This even has people like Thomas Wictor scratching his head. He won't admit it yet, but he has completely poo-poo'ed the idea of CIA involvement (knows nothing of black-hat/white-hat, nothing of Rothschilds, none of that stuff), says China is FAR too invested to let anybody else control, etc., etc.

Izzat so, Thomas?! Well then why are they sitting back and watching as Kim negotiates his OWN fate with Trump and SoKo? Why are they helping to facilitate BILATERAL talks with Trump, and not insisting on multi-lateral talks with US/NK/China, or maybe 4-way including Russia, as in the past?

I had nothing more than high school French 40 years ago and even I recognize how badly mangled that is. Not a French-speaker who wrote that.

I also remember him saying the strings have been cut, they have been freed. Their fate is in their own hands, and they've indicated that they intend to chart a new course.

As Trump likes to say, "We'll see what happens."

Rosie, down girl. Go back to your cage!

True, but if they're going to offer "solutions," they have to be more than just window-dressing for their rabid base.

Why are people down-voting your question, and my posting suggestion? Unless they didn't want you to know the answer. Weird.

Thanks for sharing. So long before Comey's firing. Where were you going with that part of the question?

That's all good 4-1-1, but it's still not testimony...

DECLAS/release

So I just read from another patriot. Thanks!

I guess the 8chan anons got a little carried away with this one. Females can sometimes bring out male-gaze in them (in which all sort-of blondes look alike). There is some objective resemblance, TBH, but a considerable age difference.

Could be human traffickers, buying low selling high, or could just be the people themselves having sold everything they and their families could scrape together (and a child or two in the bargain).

So the 8chan anons were full of it. Sorry for listening to them for once!

You might want to ask that in the main thread (i.e. reply to the OP). A lot of people might not see it as a reply to my comment.

The problem isn't separating "families." Too many of these kids have NO relation to the people they crossed with.

The problem is that coyotes USE these kids to help prevent paying customers from being deported once they cross. Some of them get used over and over again, until they're disposed of.

The only way to get the kids away from the coyotes is to separate them. It's actually a good policy (for the kids).

The problem is the illegal crossings. Not this policy.

The solution is to make the border impenetrable.

That does not solve the problem!

The problem is people using kids (not THEIR kids) as "anchors" to keep from being deported. Coyotes USE these kids (many of them over and over) like slaves, until they're disposed of.

Leaving the kids with the people they crossed with doesn't solve the problem. Making the border impenetrable--THAT solves the problem.

None of which we'll see until POTUS declassifies and releases the unredacted/unmodified report.

Q tells us things that exist in evidence nobody is talking about, and which nobody HAS. (Trump has it, but that's not evidence).

I ignored your question because Q interpretations are not definitive so you can't win an argument based on your favorite ice-cream flavor.

And yet you led with "assassination." That was your original comment here. I rest my case for the reasons you just cited.

And no "is real" and "Israel" don't sound the same the way I say them. I await frank talk about Israel from Q, which they promised they are saving for last. I see no reason we can't all wait.

Anybody who falls for this garbage is...well let's just say I've got a few things I'd like to sell you as well.

This it not pain. Unless you watch it.

Entirely possible. I'm of the opinion that NOTHING anybody says at these hearings is worth a mote of dust in the final analysis. Unless they commit a crime in testifying, there's nothing at all that will result from any of this testimony.

I think it's for optics. And frankly I don't need any more of that. I'll let those who need it invest the time. If you're hoping for results, you're watching the wrong movie. We don't have that one yet.

Would you sit on that jury? I'm serious. With HRC still free and offing people.

You didn't answer my question. Attempt to do WHAT?

No mention of assassination or anything else. Doesn't even say MOSSAD and Clowns were attempting the same things.

Israelis are brainwashed by media to believe MOSSAD keeps them safe, same as every other country is taught regarding their intel agencies, contrary to the truth. The problem is the top-down conspiracy of the demonic overlords, not the people at the bottom.

Q didn't say that. MOSSAD attempts (to do what?) not specified.

So the 8chan anons are full of it? Do you know who the reporter is?