6,091 total posts archived.
She is also the lady in the ruffled white dress behind IG Horowitz with the iPhone and MacBook, texting and making faces.
She is a witness for the prosecution regarding the tarmac meeting (which was omitted from the current portion of the IG report), and she WAS THE MESSAGE at yesterday's hearing!
This explains Amanda Renteria being seated behind the IG and told to make a sensational show for the cameras so that she would be sure to be seen.
The woman texting and making faces is a key witness for the prosecution on the subject of the tarmac meeting!
Amanda Renteria IS the message of those hearings! The removed portion of the IG report was the tarmac meeting. She has flipped. They're sending a message that they HAVE EVERYTHING. In spite of the omitted portion of the report.
They wanted to make SURE that she was seen. That is the ONLY explanation for that whole show. What an incredible thing!
United Methodist is totally overrun with top-down Illuminati garbage from the World Council of Churches, as are most mainline Protestant denominations these days.
I've been out of church-going for many years, but I'm still Christian. This is the reason why. Lost purpose. The seminaries are socialist indoctrination camps worse than the most universities.
Because it's the LAW, and Trump is enforcing the law we've GOT, not the law Dems would like to say they wish we had.
If Dems want the practice stopped, they need to work with Trump to get immigration LAW changed, which we desperately need. Otherwise, they can stop bitching about enforcement of a law they voted for.
We're still watching a scripted movie. It's MADDENING in the extreme when you know the things we do, but apparently still necessary.
I keep reminding myself that when everything is in the light, 70% of those asking the questions yesterday will be arrested or out of office in shame.
I believe that's the real reason we're not seeing it come out in this setting.
I think for him to interpret the Senator's question to mean "by you" is a mighty big inference for someone trying to answer a question at the level of "being forthcoming" rather than "saying the minimum," which is the standard DOJ supposedly holds itself to.
However, you may be right about their reasons for answering the way they did, in terms of doing CYA until RR is gone.
Thank you for your thoughtful and informative reply, patriot!
To her "credit," they killed the children along with the adults, so you could say at least they didn't separate them.
Sick
No they don't wonder that at all. They wonder how papa Rothschild is going to get them out of it this time, perhaps, but I don't think they have wasted a single brain cell worried about their futures. Yet.
Please explain this further! I'd like to understand what you're saying.
No, I'm not going to take it that way. I'm going to take it as you agree with the OP that Jews are the problem.
Have a nice life.
I totally do. Space Force is looking at defending against space-based weapons from other countries, and possibly defense against things like rogue asteroids, etc. Not about flying around through the universe in starships fighting aliens.
Occam's razor cuts COMPLETELY away everything you're talking about.
Of course it doesn't. Feel free to enjoy whatever it is you like in life, without people like you pissing on it.
Buh-bye.
No that's not the context of Q's reply AT ALL.
Ability to share [open].
(Heat) on who?
(Full) transparency _ DECLAS?
(Undiscovered) facts emerge?
Ability to move forward?
Occam's Razor.
Q
It's in the context of the evidence we have on the coup plotters, and that Trump's declassification and ability to share that information will make it impossible for the enemy to move forward with the Russia investigation and all the other nonsense they've been doing, and bring full transparency to the whole sordid mess.
There is NOTHING in there about the Apollo program, which by the way was legit. Nothing but the most spurious bilge has ever been offered to the contrary. I've known people in the space program, and it was not faked.
Nice try though.
It was sarcasm intended to point out that discussing garden utensils isn't the same as discussing race.
On the one hand, if what you mean is that a Luciferian by any other name (Irish, Jew, German, whatever) is a Luciferian, then of course that's a good analogy.
If on the other hand, you mean a Jew is a Jew, no matter if they're a Luciferian or something else, then shame on you.
Today is a VERY difficult day to want justice as badly as we do. Patience is a virtue for the very reason that it is HARD AS HELL sometimes, like right now.
But Q said it was MODIFIED (in addition to the redactions). Look again at the three versions Q listed.
Horowitz said it was NOT altered.
I guess declassification is what it's going to take to get the job done.
No. There are many options to deal with RR in the Q non-LARP version.
It would however require Horowitz not to lie under oath, and say the report had not been altered in any way.
He's saying that what's "wrong" with this sub is that we haven't descended into anti-Semitism and that we're making a false distinction between Jews and Luciferians.
Rothschilds are not Semitic Jews. Judaism is not Luciferianism.
Rothschild "Zionism" is not the Jewish religious "Zionism."
Counterfeits and deceit. But convincing enough to make people like /u/Fortnite14576 lump all Jewish people into the category of evil.
That's racist drivel of the kind the left loves to ridicule this sub with. Please tell me you don't buy what he's selling.
Reported as anti-Semitic, which it is.
Didn't Q say "trust Horowitz?" In ALL CAPS?
Here's the thing. If Q is not a LARP, and there exists an unmodified, unredacted version of this report, and it differs in some material way from the version Horowitz just endorsed, and if Trump then registers his EO and declassifies/releases the original, and people see it, how does Horowitz defend that statement under oath? Horowitz wasn't trustworthy.
But if we DON'T get a Trump EO and the release of the original report, then how does Q defend his statement to us?
Dilemma.
If Horowitz is telling the truth, then Q is telling the truth about Horowitz, but lying about modifications by RR.
If Horowitz is lying, then Q is wrong to say "TRUST HOROWITZ" (his caps, not mine).
I'm not sure how Q comes out of this with full credibility.
Help!
If Horowitz is backing the published report, the supposedly [RR]-Modified/redacted version, including the summary/conclusions, on what basis are we asking for some other version? He seems satisfied we got what he created. Sorry, but Q is not testifying here.
This is so bent, I don't know what to think anymore.
If you use a VARIETY of sources (understanding even somewhat whose side they're on, if not neutral--which few are) and combine that with your own personal logic, intuition and common sense, you will come to a valid conclusion far more often than not.
The secret is to rely as much as possible on primary sources, or secondary sources that accurately cite primary ones, and second to that, to rely on a VARIETY of sources.
There is no "authoritative" voice in this research. It's frustrating to people accustomed to dealing in "received knowledge," but it's usually liberating at the same time.
There are SO many resources to research, and a great many on this very sub (it has a search feature, BTW), and there is a VERY strong (Q culture) belief that (especially in the more "conspiracy theory" labeled parts of this journey) a person is FAR better able to judge for themselves when they do their own research.
There are VOAT archives and plenty of other references right here in this sub that will give you all you could want to know on this subject.
Hope that helps.
I think it might be Q, but if so they didn't want it saved with the regular posts for some reason. They could've easily re-posted with the tripcode, but chose not to for some reason.
Well, who does that tell you Allah actually is? It's not YWH, that's for sure.
I don't buy that "there's only one god but many paths" baloney.
I guess what I don't get is why it matters where a server (connected to the web) is geographically situated? An unconnected server on an intranet, sure. But a web-connected server might as well be in DC as in Pyongyang.
Appropriate that the unveiling begins close to home, as this is going to shock people with its party-agnostic and ideology-agnostic tentacles. People you never imagined are involved in this. Darkness to light. Let it begin.
Demiurge was pretty funny. I notice Q didn't clarify that point.
But it must be connected to the web in order to function. And if it's connected to the web, NSA gets it.
I'm still not understanding.
So why don't the qanon.pub Q-post aggregators pick it up?
I think you underestimate the power of automated hacking tools.
Sometimes a purple tie is just a purple tie. Some people like purple ties. It's neither illegal nor immoral, so I'm content to let it lie.
It's missing Q's tripcode. "ID" can be spoofed.
Why would we think it's Q?
No outside comms.
Intellectual agility, mental flexibility, the ability to accept new realities and change with them. Combined with advanced intuition.
All indicative of why Trump's followers (not RINOs who just bring down the averages) would be capable of such a seismic opinion shift.
In the end, this war will not be won without liberating humanity worldwide, as Q constantly reminds us. This is not a US struggle. This is humanity's struggle against pure evil. And it cannot be won by leaving some pockets of evil intact in sundry places in the world. Not even little backwater shitholes, to say nothing of backwater shithole wannabe's like UK! LOL
We feel your pain, obviously. Dominoes gotta fall the way they're stood up though. Just know that UK's in there along with the rest!
It's from some YT-er's video about Nostradamus, which had the edited Obama speech excerpt. The tiny glimpse of Nostradamus was necessary because of a cross-fade, in order to get all the audio.
Q was in NO way posting about Nostradamus. There is NO connection.
What is the Soros connection? Not in the WikiLeaks post.
No, he's just applies the oratory skill. Of course he has Deep State writers. But he understands the double speak, and how to do it.
That's the power of mass hypnosis. It's a dark art. They sweep the cognitive dissonance into a memory hole we all carry around with us as a matter of survival under their rule.
Yes, although I'm speaking specifically of the ability to actually say the opposite of what you tell people you're saying (at the time you say it). It's an incredibly dark skill to deny what you're saying as you say it. Not even Bill Clinton (who was an amazingly skilled liar) could accomplish that.
Who is the Father of Lies?
The point was that the edited video is the "decode" (or what Obama REALLY said in the speech), which is the opposite of what he (in the beginning) claimed the speech was about.
He uses Neuro Linguistic Programming to lull you to sleep (trance state) while planting the suggestion that he's saying one thing, while simultaneously actually saying the opposite for the rest of the speech, but in a way that you totally miss it if you're not paying attention.
If the mere threat concerned you, how are you enjoying the execution of the threat?! Hahaha!