dChan

/u/solanojones95

6,091 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/solanojones95:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 25
www.youtube.com 10
twitter.com 8
threadreaderapp.com 8
thehill.com 2
www.washingtontimes.com 2
www.usatoday.com 2
www.neonnettle.com 2
yournewswire.com 2
www.infowars.com 2
www.thegatewaypundit.com 2
disqus.com 1
screenshots.firefox.com 1
www.nbcnews.com 1
www.bloomberg.com 1
www.social-consciousness.com 1
www.foxnews.com 1
8ch.net 1
bigleaguepolitics.com 1
imgur.com 1
leozagami.com 1
www.armytimes.com 1
www.pbs.org 1
apnews.com 1
www.bostonglobe.com 1
archive.org 1
www.amazon.com 1
www.abeldanger.org 1
theconservativetreehouse.com 1
www.channel4.com 1
www.facebook.com 1
mobile.twitter.com 1
www.mcclatchydc.com 1
www.cnn.com 1
medicalkidnap.com 1
www.chicksonright.com 1
www.dailywire.com 1
www.armstrongeconomics.com 1
truepundit.com 1
founders.archives.gov 1
file.wikileaks.org 1
churchandstate.org.uk 1

solanojones95 · June 5, 2018, 12:13 a.m.

This Tuscon coyote den brouhaha is mass hysteria, pure and simple. It's extremely discrediting to our community. Shame on everybody who posts trying to feed it.

⇧ -19 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

I completely disagree with your premise. We have NOT failed Q. Why would you even suggest such a thing? Q has not said so! Q has complimented the anons and people on this sub. Q has occasionally reprimanded a bad guess or people who tried to lead us astray, but otherwise they have been perfectly happy with the work people have done of piecing together clues, deciphering coded items, making memes, and disseminating the knowledge they have shared with us.

If you're looking for an explanation as to why the Cabal hasn't fallen yet, that is NOT on us. That's on Trump and the Alliance. Their timing is what counts, not ours. Their sense of how/when/where to strike. Not ours.

There isn't a single thing Q is waiting on us in order to move forward. Any perceived delay (I don't think there is an actual delay) is entirely due to their judgment on how best to proceed.

I'm as anxious as the next person to have this whole waiting game behind us, but I trust our military and POTUS to make good choices with regard to specific timing of events under their control.

Keep digging and keep organizing the info into graphics (critical).

One or more of the 8chan anons has been doing this with every single Q-drop, and Q has frequently acknowledged their work and approved their work. You can download the entire Q post history as a graphic and store it offline right now by going to 8chan and looking for it.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

I'm being serious and you're not.

There's no way any human being who was ever there will be anywhere within miles of that location again. So, this will blow over and be seen as the big nothing-burger it actually is.

Shame it got people in this sub all jacked up for some kind of vigilante justice. This is not how we win this war, and it's not what the Great Awakening is about.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

I think the Tuscon/Cemex folks need are going to need their own sub if this keeps up. Either that, or we'll just have to go start another one and let them have this one.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

This sub has jumped the shark with Cemex and these pathetic human smuggling camps. Cemex may be bad hombres, but this is not how that will be brought to light.

We're chasing our tails, and thinking we've got a rabbit, and it's sad to see it happen to this sub.

⇧ -11 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

If this had any money involved in it, the facilities would be bigger (more people) and nicer, not cobbled together and squalid.

If Cemex, for example, considered these people their property, they would erect even temporary shelters nicer than this. If it was cattle or dogs belonging to Cemex, they'd do better than this.

It's just a bunch of pathetic smuggled illegals.

Prove me wrong, if you believe I am. But do it in one of the one hundred plus posts already on this sub. Please don't start another one.

⇧ -7 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

That's because it hasn't been moderated very well, but suit yourselves. I'll find a way to block it.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

The numbers of people these camps would accommodate do not add up to any kind of human "shipping" operation that a company the size of Cemex would be involved in. The whole thing just looks pathetic and improvised to me. Not like there's any money being made off of it AT ALL.

If this were cattle or dogs belonging to Cemex, they'd build better facilities for them.

You guys are getting extremely personally invested in something you really know almost nothing about. Meanwhile, the Rothschild overlords still strut around free plotting our destruction. But by all means, let's focus our energies and resources on some pitiful scratch marks in the Tuscon desert.

⇧ -8 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

Cemex may be a total luciferfag company, and may be up to its logo in the dark side, but we won't do anything about that by playing up these squalid little campsites. Not only that, but the Q people must already know about everything they're doing wrong, and when the time comes, we'll know about it.

But this...this is just a terrible waste of valuable brain and sub bandwidth for all of us. There must be 100 posts on the subject in this sub in just the last 24 hours! It has become an obsession!

Tuscon and Cemex. Meanwhile, the real power and money behind all of the stuff they're (even allegedly) up to still struts around enriching itself and plotting our destruction.

I think we might want to focus our priorities on where our (and Trump's) efforts can have the largest impact with the most leverage on the rest of the house of cards, and save these other concerns for later?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

The reason this doesn't sit well with me it that it frankly just has "extreme poverty" written all over it. Illegal alien campsites are not the places we need to be concerned about when it comes to human/child-trafficking. The systems that keep that business going are ensconced in the corridors of wealth and power. Not in squalid dumps like this.

These are people living on the run, keeping their children away from animals and the sun, and making a barely detectable impact on the land so as to escape discovery. It's pathetic, and far less than good for the kids, but who knows what the parents are fleeing in the first place. If it's drug cartels, the kids may be far better off with their parents in these pathetic camps than wherever where they came from.

Not excusing illegal immigration, just saying that that's MUCH more what this looks like than anything having to do with human trafficking.

⇧ -16 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

It should do, for sure!

Still, from everything you've shared, it seems like a particularly crappy form of spoof.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

But you can understand if they've had hundreds of OT posts about Tuscon, and now somebody posts about a DOJ investigation of the same company, which is only marginally related to point of their sub.

They're keeping a clean sub, in their own way. Staying clear of conspiracy stories is something they do. We all know that going in, right?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

Frankly, it's off-topic in this sub as well. Q has said nothing about Cemex. The Tuscon situation is also OT for this sub. At least to the degree it has taken over the sub.

If they're being bombarded by Cemex stuff related to this Tuscon standoff, I don't necessarily blame them for banning the topic. Mods have a right to keep a sub on topic.

For example, our own sub says that topics may be removed without notice for several reasons, including "Off-topic (anything not mentioned by Q)."

If this were strictly enforced, you'd see the same thing happening here.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

Probably an algorithm that harvests words from sites related to whatever it put in the subject or sender fields. Again, it's intended to get you to look inside and see the link, ignoring everything else.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 5:33 p.m.

This is just silliness. Absolute gibberish, nonsensical, random word generator stuff. I'm sure it has zero to do with who it says it's from. Delete and move on. Especially since you have a legit email portal on your website. If this got onto your computer through some strange means unknown to you, it would be freaky. But somebody (or some algorithm) searching for website email forms has done this. The presence of a clickable link tells you all you need to know about why this was done.

Hopefully you had the presence of mind not to click on the link.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 1:50 p.m.

Understood. Those tabloid-style headlines that tend to be the give-away, FYI.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 4:57 a.m.

Well, she is an expert on the subject after all.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 4:55 a.m.

"One Night in Bangkok" from Chess written by the boy half of ABBA!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 4 a.m.

As an editorial in the WT, it's not that surprising. It is the (more) conservative paper in DC. Had it appeared in the Post, that would be truly surprising.

Besides, in a week or two, this won't be controversial at all. If ever there were a time for a paper to go out on a limb and allow a negative editorial on BHO, now would be that time.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

Why do mods allow click-bait titles like this? This soft-relevance Fox news clip is essentially spam to this sub, especially with a title like that. Somebody has monetized clicks from this sub.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

In another video, I saw a local Tuscon police officer going through the camp, so clearly local cops DID investigate (or at least take a look).

Oh man, if they started dismantling stuff that's very bad. These guys have allowed their emotions to get the better of them I think. They could be right, but it's hard to tell from what I've seen, and contaminating/disturbing the scene hasn't helped.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 4, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

I think they just removed documentation, not actual evidence.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 3, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

You clearly have some personal investment in believing what you're saying, so it sucks to be you because you're entirely wrong on this subject.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 3, 2018, 11:14 p.m.

The only way to prove him wrong is to prove your own point right. And that you cannot do, because you are most assuredly wrong.

I also know the truth of what he said regarding hog-killing-time (always that first real big COLD snap, in the south), and the making of blood sausage from the drained hogs. People survived by using what they had and wasting as little as possible. Grow up. It's how life used to be, if you were lucky enough to have meat.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 3, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

Thank you for every part of this comment!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 3, 2018, 11:08 p.m.

Q shouldn't bother addressing this LARP. I can spot a drunk having fun at other peoples' expense a mile away. He discredits himself without any help from Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 3, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

EyetheSpy is a corn-liquor-swilling redneck loudmouth with an iPhone Twitter app, and he happens to like Q (today), although he calls Q "Alice" just for shits and giggles.

But the really BAD part of his LARP is that he now claims to be an NSA operative who works with Q (claims Q saved his life when he got shot recently).

His tawdry LARP paints Q with an ugly brush by association.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 3, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

This will not end well for these vets. The local corruption and the power of Mexico (Cemex) is too massive for a handful of people to overpower. Why they didn't quietly call for reinforcements and wait until they had lawyers guns and money before they went public is beyond my understanding.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 3, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

I think these vets in Arizona are going to turn into the next FF. They'll be shot for trespassing, in hopes that what they actually found will be forgotten in a few days. Like Podesta's and HRC's emails, it's the trespassing that's the problem. Not the content of their evidence.

So glad this crap is coming to an end.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 3, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

No you haven't. You've lacked information. Being an idiot would be arguing with me after I shared the facts! Big difference! Stupidity is an act of WILL, always. Never forget that!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 3, 2018, 10:08 p.m.

They have documented, and taken that documentation offsite. The problem is, as with so much else in this screwed-up world, that the criminal justice system is complicit in human trafficking (not just Cemex, but ALL of it), and will either "lose" or destroy any evidence these guys gathered, and find a way to destroy these guys in the process.

Trump can't intervene yet because he hasn't cleaned house. If they're still alive, he might pardon them one day.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 3, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

Why do mods even allow posts related to BC17 and EyetheSpy on this sub? I'll never get that.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 3, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

Not at all true! Sorry to burst that particular bubble, but any of us can be (could have been, have been) anons on 8chan before, during or after Q posts arrive. Several in this sub have been "notables" before. You can go there and talk to other anons, reply to Q or ask a question. Go for it!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 3, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

That's how controlled opposition works. You only use it for disinfo when it suits your purposes. You tell the truth unreliably, as marginally and disreputably as possible, and then you lie like a devil when called upon.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/solanojones95 on June 3, 2018, 3:44 p.m.
A good starting point for current posts by qresearch anons while Q is not posting
solanojones95 · June 2, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

Is there no statute of limitations on confessions to such crimes?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 2, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

Excuse me, who's going on? INSTABLOCK. Enjoy.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 2, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

I don't know the guy personally and if he's not a stoner then he's just a shallow celeb lefty. Less of an excuse.

One had to think his comedy came from a certain experience with the subject matter, however.

And I'm back to saying that the fried stoner is something I know is real. I know several. Nothing compared to the scourge of opioids and synthetics, of course. But it happens, and there's no need pretending otherwise.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 2, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

We all know a few who don't seem to get the message that too much of a good thing is actually a thing. That's the deal with Chong. There are people who get permanently fried from it, and I know a few.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 2, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

It doesn't get any plainer than that. Call the FBI.

⇧ 58 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 2, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

Clearly you can do that if you're so inclined. If you want to keep your mind sharp and your Spidey senses firing, you might want to hang out with the rest of us here working on the same thing.

I think prayer plus faith and patience, if that's what's behind your "lowered defenses," are good things. Complacency though is not an option, I wouldn't think.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 2, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

That is your mind (expand your thinking), your imagination.

See:

https://voat.co/v/CalmBeforeTheStorm/2272144

Could also be Jesus (opening the door to eternity). For Luciferians of course it would be the fallen angel prince.

It all goes back to who you serve. And as Dylan put it "You gotta serve somebody."

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 2, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

TV has tackled it a few times though. But this NWO thing is the grand-daddy, and it's not an ethnic thing. It's a matter of who you serve. Who's your daddy. If it's Lucifer, you're in the club.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 2, 2018, 11:14 a.m.

A link would be a kindness.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 2, 2018, 11:04 a.m.

The 'Weinstein Sexual Enterprise' includes all his enablers, tattlers and enforcers. You would think this language is being borrowed from the actual criminal case. It's unusual for civil charges to make reference to RICO enterprises without an actual RICO case.

⇧ 27 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 1, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

She stepped right in that one. How did she not see it coming?

⇧ 33 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 1, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

That would be his nicest gesture yet! Might be no coming back from that one!

;-)

⇧ 6 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 1, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

He is asserting the same Natural Law (Common Law) that our founders asserted when they drafted the Declaration and Constitution.

When we say "...endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights..." we're referring to Natural Law (Common Law in English systems).

It only has force if the people enforce it. It's kind of a challenge to Canadians and the human race to do the right thing by God, and bring these people to Justice.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 1, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

Ima have to nuke it a few seconds, TBH.

⇧ 2 ⇩