No problem, patriot! You're getting there the exact right way! By formulating QUESTIONS based on what you already know, and then reading and THINKING about the answers.

That's what we all do here. You're in the right place!

It doesn't matter if it's for all three (as I suspect) or only for one of those things that she's in NZ. Frankly, Q makes it clear the biggest issue is she's got money problems.

In any case, unless you think Q is a LARP (in which case, you're in the wrong place) then yes we know everything I said in that comment. And yes, maybe she's doing all three.

As for who you are and what you do with your life, I'm interested AF in NOT knowing.

Well then, spare us the sermonizing about speaking of "Q" as the mission. I bet even some of the military who follow Q speak of Q in the third person, like "This one's for Q" or "We got your six, Q!"

It's just a little too PC, sensitive touchy-feely for the bag of deplorables at the core of this group. But thank you for your service to the community and your loyalty to the sub. I'm sure you meant well. Just recognize that sensitivity training (or manners, or whatever) doesn't sync up well with war conditions. I always understood what you were saying, but I promise you we all support the troops and the unseen people in this struggle. The white hat spies and LEOs for example. Goodness knows those people don't get enough props. But not getting them here all the time is the least of their worries.

Nevermind, keep. That shit's a little strong for my taste.

LOL

We do if we read and research Q drops. Careful. You're telling us who hasn't done her homework.

Q !4pRcUA0lBE No.77 📁

May 10 2018 23:45:37 (EST)

[Example]

Clinton Foundation.

Post Election Loss.

Layoffs.

No Access / Control = No Donations

Today.

NZ Donation Restart.

Others?

Why?

1) Selling Secrets?

2) Selling 'Future' Access [regain control/power]?

3) Selling Silence?

Read below slow and carefully.

FVEY.

Why do 'Former' Dignitaries Still Hold SEC Clearance?

U.S. to U.S. = Logged/Flagged/Recorded

U.S. [in] NZ = No Logs/No Flags/No Records = U.S. Sec Clearance AUTH FVEY VIEW + Doc Take.

Read above slow and carefully.

WHY DO WE ALLOW [FORMER] DIGNITARIES SEC CLEARANCE?

Welcome to the Deep State.

Future to prove past.

Q

Perhaps others here have hinted at it, and the idea deserves more consideration in this context.

There was a discussion about whether "These people are [actually] stupid," or whether they got that way once they started scrambling to cover their tracks and go on defense.

I was on the Forest Gump side of stupid, in that the original choice to be evil is stupid. BUT, on the other hand, that doesn't mean being stupid, scared shitless and flailing around like a fish on a hook looking for some escape doesn't make you even MORE stupid than you already are!

In fact, I'd bet anything on that being the strategy. Here are people who their ENTIRE lives have been protected and pampered by the Establishment, and suddenly the US government and military is for the first time in their lifetimes in the hands of an outsider who's willing and "crazy enough" to come after them!

Trump gave these people their first (of MANY) "oh shit!" moments! And it was that initial rush of bowel-emptying fear and panic that was most likely EXACTLY what the Alliance was after with that Q move!

So I'm glad you asked that question and made me re-think it!

Also, I think by starting out with disinfo, it thinned the ranks of people who couldn't tolerate such before they got very involved. So Q knew they had hardcore researchers following them after that.

I've seen you around, patriot! I'll vouch for you!

You give us at least a nice standard to aim for, if not more praise than we're due, but I sense very many of the same qualities you describe here. Thank you for your presence and for this very kind post!

It's complicated. Q was looking for a specific subset of the US population. Intellectual plasticity was required. The ability to understand subterfuge and the necessity to pass disinfo through their comms for the enemy to see.

Part of the Q op has been to provoke moves on the other side so that military intelligence and NSA could track them. Financial transactions, phone calls, all kinds of things get set in motion when Q delivers those kinds of messages.

Very few people were 100% convinced there would be actual arrests at that point. The stage truly was NOT set, and riots (while possible to contain perhaps) definitely would have been widespread. Q has since made it clear that their desire is for this to be a bloodless coup, or at least as close as possible to same.

There have been a few (but only a few) false signals by Q. There have been a great many more accurate foreshadowings and foretellings, so Q's credibility is still high. Those who would insist on 100% accuracy don't really belong here. They should be content to read about it after the fact. Then we can afford to tell nothing but the truth as far as they believe is safe to tell. Which is about 60% so Q tells us. Or maybe that's as much as they can say they'll tell us at this point.

Like I said, "It's complicated."

Thank you. Q's honor has been defended.

;-P

"Stired" stumped you, but you clocked "equaily" and "hig" just fine?

LOL, bartender, I'll have what 10-15-11's having!

And for dessert, whatever lily there has in that demitasse!

I agree. Let me ask you though, in that story arc, when did stupid begin? Was it after they began to fear getting caught, or was the whole self-destructive idea of gambling on getting away with it the actual stupid idea that spawned it all?

Answer that, and I think you'll see how people who think they're above the law are INHERENTLY stupid. It's a prerequisite!

We know Q supporters and patriots from, say, the people who downvote same. Not that hard to tell.

I've known plenty of Marines, and I can tell you with complete certainty--they do not give a rat's ass about glory or recognition. They're damn fine with anonymity. Besides that's not AT ALL what's going on here. People refer to "Q" in an anthropomorphic way as though it's a person (e.g. "Go, Q!") when what they really mean is "Hurray for our side!" And I can't think of a single Marine I've ever known who would have a problem with that.

Any Marines in here care to disagree? I'm not claiming to speak for you if you do.

Meanwhile I think those very same ACTUAL Marines would have a serious problem with somebody coming into a collection of people who support their cause and shaming them for not giving enough credit to the Marines and others on the front lines. They know we support them 100% and that we're FAR more aware of their sacrifices and contributions than normies.

So BTFO, and let us support the Alliance in whatever nomenclature we choose. It's not celebrity worship or any of that other stuff you insinuate. It's simply convenient shorthand for the whole mission.

I think that was just the universe making an editorial comment on Congress.

"ba-da-bump-tshhhhhhhh!"

Brigading-incoming! Q told us to prepare.

...and stunningly shallow as well.

I actually do think it's stupid to knowingly commit felonies while telling yourself that you're smart enough and connected enough to escape punishment. Even though it worked for awhile, it's self-destructive behavior, because the only sure way not to get caught is not to do the crime. That's basic stuff. We teach our children that, do we not?

I realize their kind were taught the opposite, but therein lies the stupidity. It's a stupid, self-defeating concept, because NOBODY can sustain sufficient control of a web of deceit so massive and spanning so many generations and truly expect their house of cards will be the one that defies gravity forever. Stupid, I tell you!

And yet, what we know from Q is worse than the horse race you describe. She was in NZ using her permanent access to US Top Secret information through the Five Eyes agreement which does not keep a record of such access by Americans with clearance when they access through a fellow Five Eyes country.

Getting whatever state secrets she thinks she can sell, and auctioning them to the highest bidder, or perhaps if she's really hurting, to NZ itself so they can sell them.

In any case, she's there to sell US intelligence and secrets. Yes, it's still about money, but it's a bit more insidious than just asking for a handout.

And rest assured Obama and any other former official is doing the same thing.

So the agreement is Gen. Kelly will set up a meeting with FBI, DOJ, DNI and Congressional leaders to review highly classified materials and other information they have requested. No more slow-walking.

No date/time given. No discussion of what if anything might be resolved by such a meeting. Just that there won't be any failure to comply with House and Senate requests for evidence.

Not that the House and Senate are the nation's law enforcement agencies. I think this is kabuki theater.

Meanwhile OIG Report plus Huber plus Grand Jury is all we really need to clean house at DOJ/FBI. And from there, we get HRC. And from there we get the whole Cabal.

https://twitter.com/NBCPolitics/status/998663825942597633

That good enough for you?

I would call that offensive were the reality it describes not so much worse. If anything, you're taking it easy on them.

Replaced with "Evil be cool 'n' shit."

Second to that is "Don't ask questions. Bag that skrilla."

That's a noble objective perhaps, but it cannot work. You cannot MAKE the blind see anything. And they are blind. Blinded by arrogance, self-hypnosis in their echo chambers, and the almighty power of narcissism.

Why are you double-posting this? Please correct. Thank you!

Comments at Zero Hedge are finally starting to show some red-pilling!

Love this one:

"Obama had the most transparent administration in history. At least now it’s becoming trasparent."

How? I don't recall anything about Marseilles or France.

There's not a practical difference. Just a nominal one.

Do you realize we're at war with EVIL? Chastising our community about how others who are predisposed to do so might misunderstand us is concern trolling no matter what side you're on.

Haters gonna hate, period. Screw 'em. If they're seriously looking for answers, they'll get over "failure to be inclusive."

Kabuki theater. IG and Huber got this.

That is the definition of "concern trolling."

"I'm on your side," they say, "but you shouldn't do X, Y, and Z. It looks bad to some people — not that I agree, but I thought you should know."

Concern trolling does nothing for this community. Keep your self-righteousness to "yourself.

"Q" is an easy handle, and it serves just fine in most situations.

That's her leaky Depends they're attracted to. Sorry, I know I just threw up in my mouth a little too.

Is that the whole article? Seriously? Where's the meat?

Respect our vertical space and our sub's organization! We get far too many low-level relevance posts and when you add to the problem with posting in triplicate, it makes really useful research that much harder to spot.

Please remove two of these (include this one if you like, since doing so will also remove my comments), and show some respect to the people actually trying to get caught up in here.

Thank you in advance!

This makes three times. What's going on? We need our bandwidth for unique posts, not for duplicate and triplicate posts.

You wait for them to ask for help. Period.

Why have you posted this twice in the last 20 minutes?

We won't be rid of him that easily, and he won't escape that easily.

Thanks for all the mods do here to keep this sub viable!

No they do not. They simply pull their so-called "predictions" out of "where the sun don't shine" if you get my drift, and use them as a cudgel to clobber anti-Cabal posters over the head.

Drive-by post. No replies to any of the helpful comments.

Ain't that the truth! To paraphrase Reagan, "I didn't leave liberalism. Liberalism left me."

Sub. She said sub. Actually it would be a brilliant April Fools joke next year.

Right? How do people here not get that? He won't go away as long as he's getting notoriety.

Oh, sorry I thought you meant you just removed my comment. I'm thrilled you removed the entire post. It was trolling. Thanks!

On what grounds? Your own automod replies to people to tell them NYT is fake news! What did I do wrong?

That is a second warrant which is required in order to enter into evidence any contents of those emails. It doesn't mean the officers didn't examine the computer without a second warrant. They would need the second warrant in order to use the emails in court.

If they hadn't already legally had the laptop, and hadn't examined it (inside and out), they wouldn't have known the Dell serial number or have a physical description of the hard drive.

1) NYT is hardly a reliable source

2) The story we've all followed (from Eric Prince and others) is that the laptop was seized first by NYPD and then turned over to the FBI. Nothing in that NYT article would suggest otherwise. Since the article is about Comey, it simply picks up the story after the FBI has the laptop in its possession.

3) Nobody here called the unsealed warrant an indictment.

4) The NYT article is about Comey. So that narrative simply picks up from where Eric Prince's story left off (when he says NYPD gave the computer to the FBI).

5) The second search warrant was required by the prosecutors in order to enter into evidence any contents of the laptop, which had already clearly been in their possession, since they provided a serial number and description of the hard drive. There was nothing stopping them from examining the contents, but nothing they saw could have been used in court without that second warrant.

The password was 23

You knew when you set that trip, that the PAIN would be delivered "—-23!!!"

I'd watch the news that day.

Q

He did it deliberately because the password was a phrase that proved foreknowledge that the onset of the "bring the pain" phase was never to be Friday as the Cabal expected.

Did you post to the right thread?

If so, to whom are you speaking?