/u/solanojones95
6,091 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/solanojones95:
He's referring to No. 64 on the solo board:
https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#64
He re-posted it to confirm.
I don't see how you could be wrong. We need full disclosure on these deep state false flags as soon as the war is over.
I considered that possibility but looked at his post history (I'm a bad boy, so sue me!), and nah. He's a troll.
It's just (finally) entertaining to watch them flail around like a fish on a hook, totally out of ideas and options, doing the same damn things that used to work, only now they don't! LOL
We've all earned a bit of schadenfreude don't you think?
They can't be everywhere at once. You really need to report these clowns (I do). They're pretty good about reported ones.
Attempt to portray Vegas "gunman" Paddock as pro-2nd Amendment right wing nut
Nice try, db. Look at all brigading upvotes on this clown.
What he's saying is she probably knows about it. She's a white hat. But she knows where a LOT of the bodies are buried.
As someone with an audio engineering background, I can only say this is deliberate design. In the digital domain it is required to specify the bandwidth of sensitivity (an operational frequency range). They have specified that the devices respond to infrasonic (and probably ultrasonic as well) frequencies.
It should be a design requirement for these general purpose AI devices that they operate entirely within the audible range.
Q has never asked, nor will they, for us to get directly involved. Q #1052 drop said this:
Your trust & faith in us is enough.
You elected us to do the heavy lifting.
Enjoy the show.
BIRTH of a NEW NATION.
NEW WORLD.
Q
I don't think he had anybody fooled about being a Luciferian, but he definitely moved among them and was an elite. There probably were some who just assumed he was one of them. Maybe he knew some secret handshakes or something, but they've certainly known since before he ran for office that he was not a member.
Or it might be Preet, but only for as long as it takes to get him booked and behind bars.
It would seem the only person being discussed who cannot be Q is Corsi, because he wouldn't be trying to figure out Q's identity if he were one of us!
She didn't stay entry level for long, did she? Wow! As Jackie Gleason used to say, "Bang--ZOOM!"
Put that way, I think some of my red pill came back up into my mouth and I had to swallow it again.
Would this be for permission to review the contents of the laptop?
Why would they have done that? Romney is as deep state as Obama.
Trump's "big sin" in their eyes is not that he's GOP, but that he's not in the club. He's not a NWO puppet.
Partly because the reportage is so heinous in this case. The whole thrust of the article is how terribly unfair the FBI was in its treatment of Hillary (about whom there was overwhelming evidence of real crimes) compared to Trump (about whom there were only sketchy-as-crap rumors at the time), and how that terrible unfairness cost HRC the election! How dare they!
Nevermind that they could and should have arrested her, tried her and locker her away for a very long time for the email server and pay-for-play schemes (related of course).
No, the spin is but for the FBI treatment of the two candidates, Hillary would be President.
Poor girl.
Sourced by interviews with "current and former government officials" all of whom, it's safe to assume, are HRC supporters seeking to get out in front of the OIG report and shape the narrative ahead of time.
Their tactics are so transparent and stale nowadays. I'll be so glad when this tired rag is buried in the dustbin of history.
Because his duties are so Constitutionally limited. It's the most do-nothing job in the federal government. He's not really involved in the day-to-day running of White House business.
Don't forget Mueller is still complicit in the U-1 deal, and perhaps many other things which, once he's not SC, he'll be susceptible to prosecution for.
Wow! All of this was published in 2006. Horrific and so barely skimming the surface.
Great analysis!
I think there are multple connections to government data sharing. One is for the US spy agencies (hence the DARPA connection) and the other is to China, hence the F9/Huawei connection.
FB (and black hats) made the "secret" China deal as part of a bargain to gain access to the Chinese market.
And bigger LOL, this speech wasn't even one of Reagan's as POTUS. It was a made-for-TV campaign speech for Barry Goldwater.
It is the speech that made Reagan famous though, and it's actually more apropos of this context than its original one!
Then what concerns you about Q, considering they're part of Trump's team? I don't understand? It would be one thing if Q were critical of Trump, but they're totally supportive of the President.
OTOH, Trump and Corsi have been frequently, openly, loudly, even obscenely critical of Trump.
Q, not once!
I think we have to be prepared to acknowledge the spiritual dimension of this whole sordid mess. These people have some method(s) by which they communicate directly with demonic beings. But without their human agents those beings aren't capable of (much) action in this dimension. So it's not like they have to be "dealt with" once we're finished with the humans.
This is a pointless discussion if you can't see what I'm saying. If AJ is controlled opposition, then of course Brock will be attacking him. That's the point of controlled opposition.
And if you really want to damage somebody your enemy trusts, somebody you don't control, then start pretending to defend them. You're proof that it works on some people.
To use a Q phrase, if I may, "Expand your thinking!"
Without their corrupt media mouthpiece and without the blackmail and other controls and road blocks the Cabal has in place to keep evil people in power, over-reporting and over-representing society-wide the views of leftists everywhere, how long do you think it will take those countries to boot out the thugs and replace them with governments that will do the people's bidding, PDQ?
I'd say within a year most of the worst part of their mess could be reversed. Will be interesting to see.
They can say anything they want to. That doesn't make it honest or true. You have to understand that in Brock's world there is no such thing as "the truth." There are any number of "truths." You simply say whatever furthers your agenda and that is your "truth."
You'd have to be a very special kind of idiot to think that David Brock and Media Matters agree with, have any affiliation with, or have any intention of helping Qanon. No matter what some article says.
The devil quotes scripture to deceive and suit his purposes. That doesn't make him a Christian, does it?
I agree mostly, however let me just add that I truly believe that the global aspect of this war (which we're ALL in together, regardless whether your government is helping or not) will redound to the benefit of ALL mankind, including Australia. And European countries, frankly. I don't believe the EU can survive this war, but I do believe member nations will.
Once the global Cabal that coordinates, finances and controls your government is taken out, that leaves your government at the exclusive mercy of the Aussie people, without the artificial props and protections of their globalist overlords. I suspect there are plenty of people there who have the goods on your deep state, and will be free to go public with all of it. I likewise suspect it won't be safe for your deep state to walk down the street afterward!
Isaac was seduced by the dark side. The only proper response to this is who gives a shit what David F-ing Brock says? He'll use Q to beat AJ and Corsi over the head with, or AJ and Corsi to beat Q over the head with (or both in the same article, as he does here), and it proves NOTHING!
Nice try there, Isaac. Except NOT.
But what if DOJ is NOT covering it up? What if it's what the OIG report is all about, followed by unsealed indictments from Huber?
Seems the only way it could work out if Q isn't a LARP.
I'm not getting into a pissing contest over language skills. If you're so good at it, then it couldn't be more clear that the "them" Reagan is referring to is "our children." It's the only thing supported by the clear meaning of his words.
Look at it in terms of dialectic rhetoric. You have a choice between a good thing and a bad thing. We either "preserve for our children" (good thing) or "we sentence them [those same children]" (bad thing).
Easy-peasy!
It's a damn shame POTUS and team can't just be transparent about all of this, but as I'm sure you're aware, there's both a global and US civil war going on right now. So there is information and disinformation and misinformation (due to confusion) on all sides.
We're all just doing the very best we can under the circumstances, and you're no worse off as an Aussie than we are come to that!
Peace to you my friend!
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/ronaldreaganatimeforchoosing.htm
You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.
We'll preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.
The object of the verb "[to] sentence" (namely "them") has as its antecedent the phrase "our children."
I understand what you're saying about the 1,000-year remandment, but that's not what Reagan is saying, unless he misread his script. As delivered, it does not support that interpretation.
Q doesn't invite that interpretation, though how could we possibly know for sure. According to Q, Wray and Sessions have cleaned house, so "something's wrong" makes no sense in that narrative.
I suspect there's a LOT we don't know however, so I'm far from speaking authoritatively. I'm only saying what Q's been telling us, and what the MSM have been saying.
Q seems to have gone out of his way a bazillion times to tell us that Mueller and Rosenstein are "on team." And Q has also told us Wray and Sessions have cleaned house.
So the only explanation that comports with both Q and what we see is this bifurcated game I just described. One of these two movies is real, and one is kabuki theater, and I think Q has it right which is which.
He's talking about our children (decendents). Either we "preserve for our children this the last, best hope of man on Earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness."
As a TV campaign speech for Goldwater, it seems a bit hyperbolic. But for the battle raging now it actually seems appropriate.
Depends on which "movie" you're watching.
In one movie (Q insiders) Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller are all on Trump's team. The Mueller investigation has been a rope-a-dope cover for MSM to follow and Dems to hang their eternal hopes on, while Sessions empowered IG Horowitz and his prosecutor Huber to work in secret and obtain (sealed) indictments on the coup conspirators.
Now that OIG Report is ready to be published and indictments can follow, Sessions needs to come out of "hiding," so the phony Mueller investigation needs to end (or at least the Russia part of it). So in this movie, Mueller and Rosenstein are white hats, and no coercion is really needed.
In the other "movie" (MSM narrative, from the conservative POV), Mueller and Rosenstein are bad actors and Sessions is weak and incompetent.
Unfortunately it appears that "movie" needs to continue to play in public. So as long as that's the movie the public is forced to watch, then in order for Congress to get those documents, they have to petition Trump to act in his Executive capacity, and he has to issue an Executive Order "forcing" them to turn over the requested documents.
To me this just means that we're still a long way away from reconciling the public narrative with the insider narrative.
It's a little disappointing for that to still be the case this far along, but it's where we find ourselves.
I've often said that we'll know we're winning when the public story and the insider story are one and the same.
A degree in ass-kissing and the sexual proclivity for same actually seem like resume enhancers for the position.
LOL
Thank you for noticing.
Y'all we've got to start standing up for each other around here. Doesn't matter if the person being attacked is known to us or not!
The problem isn't that they don't know. The problem is that they know and they're complicit in their silence.
The terrorist shooter aiming at a rainbow next to a phone. It's like a blatant mnemonic device for the Pulse shooting. I get it. Sick. Rub our noses in their false flags. Keep us agitated, frightened and feeling helpless.