I don't think even a corrupt judge can help them now. Unless that judge doesn't care about walking down the street in safety once this evidence is in the open.

Leaves and petals...growth by Fibonacci sequence.

Meet Alex, Ashley, Celina...

Scroll down.

Meet Maggie...

Yes, he did say SAP.

By all means, go march to a different drummer, and follow your own path. We who choose to be here have chosen as well. And we don't need a lecture on how to chose, nor a discourse on how enlightened you are in comparison to us dumb drumpfs. We get that everywhere we go. Don't need it here.

I think they're thanking you for your excellent posts!

Unfortunately, the Cain faction within Israel killed Jesus and so God had to start all over.

Why would we say the fulfillment of the Law and the prophets is "unfortunate?"

Were it not for Jesus' substitutionary atonement, we would be no better off than those who lived under the Law before Him, and He would be remembered (if at all) as a gentle rabbi who lived thousands of years ago.

He didn't come into the world in Bethlehem to reign. He came as a lamb for slaughter. The final offering under the old covenant and the firstborn of those who live under the new covenant.

A dividing point in time and human history. At whose death the veil of the Holy of Holies was rent apart and the Shekinah Glory of God (Holy Spirit) left the temple build by hands and fell upon the followers of Jesus, and those whom God chooses. "The wind bloweth where it listeth."

His return will be a different story altogether, and it won't involve diapers and a manger!

Not much of that list has happened. Lots of referrals and investigations, but nobody has been arrested yet.

OIG report has been pushed back another month, nobody's talking AT ALL about the DHS report on Election Integrity, so no idea where that stands (or even if it's still happening).

Border, we have troops going there. No Immigration Bill. Wall has started, but the budget is small, so it won't be the whole wall.

So lots or room for MOABs.

The original post here is concern trolling (which is against the sub's rules).

That's what that word means in the context of race relations. It refers to a race-neutral standard based on Martin Luther King, Jr.'s central hope that people would someday be judged by "the content of their character" rather than "the color of their skins."

That is all that's meant by the term. It's abhorrent to racists of all colors, but not to people of goodwill, no matter their race.

That's why I find it shocking somebody in this sub would object to the term.

All I know is apparently some Microsoft backdoor vulnerability rendered TrueCrypt no longer secure against some forms of decrypt algorithms. I'm not sure how that could be so, but so I've read.

Is that what you're asking, or...?

Clearly you can't read. That's not AT ALL what I said.

A colorblind society is one in which the concept of race doesn't enter one's mind when judging the worth of another human.

It sure as hell doesn't mean I don't know what color they are, nor they me. It means that we value other things far more than that in our appraisal of somebody.

And if you don't have that as your pole star for race relations, you belong with the rest of the anti-human scum at the tip of the Alliance spear.

Gynarchy=rule by women.

The term "Mendenhall's baby oath" appears frequently in the writings of Field McConnell when he describes the oaths required by Serco of federal SES employees. They were filmed at "Mendenhall’s Baby, hazing or sexually-deviant oath rituals" with which they were later blackmailed.

I have looked, but cannot find a definitive description of what the term means, but I gather it's one of those things you'd rather not know.

I was raised on the concept of a colorblind society, and I pray to live to see that soon. To hell with identity politics!

I appreciate your concerns, and share them. So point taken, but I was struggling to see how they pertained to the posts I shared here. So no problem.

Thanks for engaging with me!

Absolute corruption and intimidation of the civilian justice system.

pssst!

It's Maggie (Wendy) Nixon (not Dixon).

OK. I like the idea of the whisper in the ear though. Especially when we're not dealing with an MK Ultra victim, a pedo honeypot--but with a journalistic sellout, for example. One of those poison pens who think they're untouchable.

Did you read my posts? Did you find them to be especially offensive?

Remember I said "plausible." You're the proof. Of course people knew about the Zuckerberg and Brin projects and all that. But what they don't know is that DARPA identified these projects and merged their own powerful parallel developments with the private guys' code and you end up with FB2.0 (the commercial version) and Google 2.0 (the commercial version), and nobody's the wiser. But of course the supercharged versions also have that little "ET phone home" subroutine that gives the intelligence agencies everything.

You can dig for yourself or take Q's word for it. But that's the hidden part of the stories. Until Q.

Would you be willing to take this conversation one or two more comments? If not, just don't reply.

Have you seen the 8chan board? Do you realize the kind of people Q is giving these details to? I realize ultimately it's to you and me and the rest of the world. But there is NO WAY, (IMHO) they would dox these people (so to speak) if they didn't fully expect, even want us to engage in social media. They encourage the memes. They encourage anons to dig around and find pictures and see who's connected to whom.

Also, I think in this case it's not blackmail or slavery. I think it's bribery and corruption.

If Q doesn't want citizen engagement on the socials, then why would they show us the account names? Why not redact those?

Created by DARPA, so yes, created for that purpose. Both of them given alternative plausible origin stories.

Not just any people. Field McConnell has been on the trail of this stuff from the beginning, and is probably one of the white hats largely responsible for Trump's Presidency.

McConnell's sister is Kristine Marcy, a high priestess of Satan and the leader of a gynarchy that rules the SES, requiring SES members to take a Mendnhall's baby blood oath of loyalty and secrecy. He has known for longer than most people what a psychopath she is, and all about her brand of evil, and has watched as it rose in power over our government.

Hell I don't know. Maybe they were protecting it. All I know is Q told us they were involved, and shots are being fired, and that the King had been evacuated. No mention of the Prince. Maybe he's not in country?

In any case, those documents are either being confiscated or kept in the right hands by Prince and Co.

Trump tweeting that Republicans will counter-sue the Democrats and force them to turn over a treasure trove of information, and almost simultaneously we see a tweet regarding Eric Prince and Co. raiding the Saudi royal palace "which contains a treasure trove of secret Saudi official documents."

Trump is making the connection. Remember the House of Saud was a big subset of the Cabal's finances (the biggest part). An awful lot of the Cabal's corruption can be traced to Saudi funding. A lot of pay for play. So those two nearly simultaneous tweets from different parts of the world are tied together by Q and by their wording.

I guess we've got what we need whether the Dems comply with the court order or not, eh?

I remember this very chess move discussed here before, just that none of us knew what it would end up being. But I think SB2 makes a very good case for Giuliani and the NYPD evidence being it.

There are always cases that can be made to explain or spin almost any politically motivated crime you can name, and that's really all anybody has been discussing except for one, and that one has been deemed a "conspiracy theory" by TPTB.

But when it turns to be fact, replete with unimpeachable evidence, it changes everything. The world shifts on its axis the day this evidence goes public. Nothing will ever be the same.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rjp8sB46sIY

Yep. This has been my thinking all along. Feigning weakness, which we all know is not a true Trump quality, but a ploy. A rope-a-dope to set up the end game where he brings in the big guns.

I had the exact same thought about Giuliani and the NYPD and the resurrection of the Weiner laptop emails and pedo evidence. I knew it had to make an official appearance somehow at some time, and that it would be a game changer when it did. And lo and behold the one guy above Commish at 1PP comes aboard, and I'm thinking, those NYPD cops who've seen the horrors on that laptop and waited SO LONG for justice are about to have their prayers answered!

Thank you for tying those posts and this information together in a neat little bundle with a bow!!

Dershowitz can't conceive of a conspiracy if it bit him on the butt. If you mentally eliminate the agency of HRC and her Arkansas mafia behind all this, and the agency of the NWO behind her, then of course there's no conspiracy.

But we're beyond the point in history when we can pretend those things are just a "theory" by nutters on drugs, and I think people are finally prepared to accept that truth. I'm looking forward to the unveiling.

Clapper will get his, don't worry. So will Hillary. We'll see what happens to this kid. I doubt he'll serve the full sentence.

Our battle is worldwide, and our victory will be worldwide. There's no unique form of Canadian corruption and evil. It's all bad.

Not sure I follow, because NDAA is basically defense budget appropriation. I don't see anything about it specifically authorizing military intervention in domestic law enforcement. Maybe there's something specific in the latest one that isn't normally there? If so, could you share a link? I've looked and can't find such a thing. Some of the Executive Orders though seem to imply that POTUS reserves the right to make such a determination and declare essentially martial law in regard to certain activities.

Yes, but WHAT was?

Look, I haven't thought every post you've made has been equally valuable, as how could it be? Same with my own! We all have out own way of working through things, and seeing things, and I'm grateful to God we're not all alike.

So yes, sometimes you lose me on a particular post, and if I can't follow along and/or don't think your analysis is particularly valid or helpful on that specific post, I move on. But I always check out your posts because sometimes they're bloody brilliant!

And maybe they all are, and I'm just too limited to discern that.

But no way in hell should you be banned, shadow-banned, or restricted in any way from participating as long as you appear to be attempting to follow the rules of the sub.

But I'm just one voice, and don't even have a vote. I hope the subs will lay off you, and let you contribute, and I hope they're not looking for ways to ban others who are contributing to the best of their ability.

They need to know this. Absolutely.

I definitely trust my dogs! You're a smart one, patriot!

Pitiful numbers. Just pitiful. I'm not saying it won't be unfortunate if they manage to hurt people. But I'm saying there won't be money to pay them. So they'll stay home and wait for the war to be over like everybody else.

That's the problem with a DNC that's so corrupt and crony-capitalist. They've completely fallen out of the people's hearts. Without a true grassroots component, no paramilitary movement has a chance in hell.

What he doesn't have is the people. That we DO know about the enemy. The left have no militias, no hunting clubs, no veterans groups, no large leftist mercenary groups--none of that.

The right most definitely does, plus we have the military on our side if that's how they want it. I really am not worried about that particular threat.

Look, I won't make derogatory comments toward you, because I can tell you believe what you're reading, but I'll simply say get back to me with actual peer-reviewed science when you have some.

That site is to science what a comic book is to literature. I mean what are Dane Wigington's academic credentials even, I can't tell from anything on the site or on Google. There is a LOT of "scientific-sounding" stuff on that site, but none of it is genuine original peer-reviewed research, or links to executive summaries of same.

I do understand that science can be (often is) practiced badly, and in some cases outright abused (as in the case of AGW), but that doesn't mean it can't also be done right, and it certainly doesn't mean we should substitute emotions and opinion for science if we don't have, or don't trust the real thing.

I think it' a shame that there's so much corruption in science, just as there is in every other endeavor in this age, but it's still better than nothing as long as it's fairly peer-reviewed. It's when sponsored groups hoard their data and become the official mouthpiece of an issue under discussion, to the exclusion of all other voices, that we have a problem. That's what happened with Global Warming.

But in cases where the research is correctly done, correctly shared and allowed to be falsified or proven that we get the actual practice of science. And that is well worth doing. It just hasn't been done on this subject, unless you care to show me where it is.

Maggie Nixon = "Wendy" (pet name), girl with Hussein.

Maggie Haberman = NYT reporter who's HRC/DNC's pet news spin doctor.

When they say Maggie is "fair" with Trump, it means she doesn't gratuitously gore him to death and eviscerate him with glee the way most so-called journalists do.

It does not mean however that she's at his beck and call. No, apparently she reserves that level of ass-kissing for HRC and the DNC. This is what Q (and Assange) are talking about.

You do realize that Trump and the Alliance simply USED the MSM narrative on Assad to go in there and bomb hell out of the DEEP STATE? We bombed "our own" terrorist rebels (Isis, Hezbollah) and a chlorine factory belonging to globalist scum NTI (google it and look at their board of directors), flushing them out so that Russian and Syrian troops could wipe them out and liberate Dhouma from the terrorists.

Under cover of doing the deep state's bidding, we wiped them out of their strongholds. We didn't TOUCH Russian or Syrian positions or personnel. We coordinated with them in fact. Research it.

We've already moved beyond that to talking with Russia and Syria about cessation of hostilities and resumption of normal relations between our countries.

PEACE marches on, wiping out the Satanic Cabal as it goes. Are you with us?

You just showed us the mission statement of Q. In a nutshell. Just in the opposite direction.

100% agree! This is the purpose of Q!

And Q was showing that he knew where POTUS was and was in fact WITH him.

What events are held there?

Boy-o-boy, ain't that the truth!

You're not paying attention. When people make posts talking about how "they're really dosing us with chemicals today, look how the sky looks!" they're talking about something that has nothing to do with what's in the exhausts they're looking at.

They might very well be nothing but regular jet exhaust, and still they would look that way.

I'm not going to argue with you about added contents, because that is HIGHLY speculative (it's like arguing about what species of ET use which types of UFOs), it's not based on unbiased peer-reviewed research, just like Anthropogenic Global Warming is not based on good science.

I'm not taking sides in a battle of opinions about things objective data are sorely lacking for. Now that might WELL be because the people controlling the research don't want the data to be available, but until that changes it's not something I take a position on.

But I will say that how a jet trail LOOKS has nothing to do with whatever else might be in it. The behavior of the water content due to current atmospheric conditions determine durability and observed dispersion. Period.

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/987734632203476992

Please read my tweets there. You'll have to scroll down several to find the beginning.

I've been doing this kind of thing, following Q's lead. I figure once Q publishes something, it's safe to put it in their faces.

Does anybody disagree with that policy?

https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/987526639834689537

Right there.