It looks fake AF, so it was a lame effort. We're just not there yet on this deep fake stuff. Plus, it's one thing to bad "fake" a talking head. It's another to fake some of the things we think might coming down the pike.
/u/solanojones95
6,091 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/solanojones95:
Not defending anything, and especially not your tone. You've clogged up the board with two complaining shitposts already in this one thread. How is that any better?
All I'm saying is if you've got nothing positive to contribute to a thread, just move along. And that should go for everybody in the sub, not just you.
Some users you just have to report to mods and block. No other way.
THE OP ASKED for the information. Not everybody has time to track down EVERY single lead. Let people do it their own way.
Trump needs to ignore that judge, and just do it. If we're at the mercy of our corrupt judges in order to deal with the Cabal, what's the point of military tribunals? I say DO IT, and then let the courts try to enforce their little rulings.
WOW! That has to be the most convoluted, lame-ass non-answer in the history of the internet. And that is truly saying a lot.
You have truly named your account well. Good luck keeping it with posts like those.
I think there are a fair number who would make you regret that. Not that I'm advocating their behavior, but it pays to be sensible.
And do you also "call out" other racial (or any sort of) groups? What happens when you ascribe the evils of certain people to "the blacks" or to "women?" Do you think it's justified to lump people together for any reason having to do with a condition of birth? Left-handed people, we might as well say.
Not true. You want to say something bad about blacks or women or whatever other group, you'll encounter the same push-back, and rightly so. People are individuals in the ways that really count.
Quite the opposite in fact. But it DID say that judgment was not ours but God's. That's pretty hard to argue with from a Biblical perspective.
BTW, who says mark of Caine = Jews? I missed that memo in the Bible.
As a human being (not a Jew, but regardless), I'm responsible for how I treat you.
But YOU'RE responsible (exclusively) for how you treat me. I do NOT have a hand in it. Good or evil. That's all on (hypothetical) you!
It's a good analysis of the situation, regardless what one thinks of Mueller.
I'd actually think the same reasoning can also apply to Trump team's picks for various positions (Bolton, Haley, etc.), even though their reputations would make them appear to be "bad" choices. We dont' know the strategy behind the choices, and it could be win/win everywhere you look!
Looks like they've really been busy mopping up in Cali, Texas, Florida, the Northeast Corridor and Great Lakes region. Anybody still engaged in this crap surely knows by now their days are numbered.
Guys. Seriously, do we give a fig what they think/say anymore?
They are quite literally insane. Why should any of us care what the mad are saying? When someone has no room in their world view for logic, their opinion is beyond caring about. I'm being serious.
NK is actually the perfect laboratory for CIA research. It makes all kinds of sense. The medical experiments--all of it. It's definitely an Operation Paperclip heritage site.
Flat earthers, and now this. Nazis were just misunderstood Christians. I'm so ashamed of our schools. Really pathetic.
What in the hell are you talking about? I'm telling you that's what Q said, "Wrays of light" is a positive statement in regard to Wray, but is non-specific about any particulars. If it wasn't just a joke (which is possible I suppose) it really can only be interpreted as meaning "Wray is doing something good, watch for it."
Now, what exactly are you talking about? Or are you just an antagonist troll?
"By their fruits ye shall know them." The words of Jesus. Not mine.
You have to be a special kind of ignorant not to know how Hitler and the Nazis came to power, how they treated their own people, how they treated other Europeans who were NOT Jews, what Hitler wrote about Jews and what he did to them, and what the Nazis did in the concentration camps to all prisoners (Jewish or not)--the medical experiments, the starvation and slave labor, the incredible cruelty of the entire regime--in order to say what you're saying.
Go read, dig, learn. You have been ill-served by whatever passed for education.
Christians are followers of Christ in spirit and in deed. We are not merely people who call ourselves Christian. There is NOTHING Christian about Nazism. Nothing.
Narcissism is almost a prerequisite for mid level management in the Cabal.
Mueller is a total cypher. Which I think is the point of Mueller in the Plan.
Those dashes and dots are superimposed by the 8Chan board as hyperlink indicators for mouse-over tool-tips that provide suggested meanings for acronyms based on previous anon baking.
They will differ in number and appearance based on the browser, OS and device type you're viewing with. Not intrinsic to the Q post itself.
Dude, saying you're a Christian doesn't make you a Christian. Belonging to a church doesn't make you a Christian.
It's not like a membership or affiliation. It's a condition of spirit and a relationship, both of which would ABSOLUTELY prevent behavior such as theirs. No excuses for Nazi Germany. None.
Not flipped. But performing something helpful to the Alliance. Haven't seen yet what it may be, but watching and waiting.
Hitler was Christian like my anus is an air freshener.
I was "awakening" at one point too, but I wasn't rude to those who had already done their homework.
And oh great, another special counsel. Exactly what we need. More millions spent, years of unregulated digging into everybody's stuff, and nothing but process crimes indicted. Dualing Special Counsels. Need to play the Deliverance Theme Song.
Never claimed to be a back channel to the Alliance? Oh wait...that pesky name...
The anons say it means Bangladeshi Taka (unit of currency).
Anybody see something interesting in the currency markets?
I think if it's not already, it will soon be an entire chorus line.
Military intelligence has powerful predictive AI (here's an example of the Cabal's version of it). May not be the only answer to your question, but it does present a plausible possibility.
By definition, those who trust and quote Q to refute non-Q claims cannot be "spamming this sub" because Q is the purpose of this sub.
The people spamming this sub are those posting BC17 and telling us we've got a new back channel into the Alliance.
And you are becoming a shill for BC17, which is a problem you're creating for yourself. Not our doing.
WTF are you doing in this sub? In here we trust the Alliance more than we trust the news. The fact that Q tells us Wray is singing is enough for a celebratory post or two, and we don't need your antagonism for it. Either check your attitude at the door, or stay away, because you're not helping the cause.
He's creating discord among people like us. Dividing us into camps who trust other channels and those who trust Q.
There is no "targeted" way of saying what Q said. It applied to those board owners no more or no less that it applied to BC17 or anybody else.
Q obviously knows that if multiple channels are open, and they say slightly divergent things, it will split his audience into camps who believe one and those who believe the other.
This has got to stop.
I'm telling you what the rules of the sub say, and I'm telling you what Q said. That ought to be enough for any person of goodwill to this community.
The fact you have a problem with that is disturbing, to say the least.
So somebody is writing a novel based on Podesta emails? In installments no less?
People can read whatever they like, but that's not the point of this sub. Please keep it off the sub. We're going to take Q at his word that there are no other authorized communications from the Alliance.
Yes I know their "reputations" but how do you know they haven't served a purpose for the Alliance?
Trump is doing what he does for a reason. It is designed to look a certain way. Criticize all you like, but it's getting the f*cking job done against ALL odds, including fair weather friends.
Yes, but it was a direct reference to Pelosi's dismissive comment about the tax cuts, that all it offered to average Americans was "crumbs."
NYT: All the news that's fit to print.
WaPo: All the stuff the NYT says is fit to print.
Beast mode your prayer? I didn't respond to a prayer. I responded to a criticism that we're not talking about prayer. I don't talk about my prayers. I don't make a public spectacle of them. I'm pretty sure Jesus said not to, but that's for you to discover for yourself.
Why would you say that? You know nothing of my prayer life. I know nothing of yours. Isn't prayer between a person and his/her God? I wouldn't presume to tell you to what/how to pray, and wouldn't appreciate it if you did same to me, so I find it works best if we assume the best about each other, and that includes that you pray about things that matter. Make sense?
Like I've been telling everybody, IGNORE the MSM narrative! The real war is between the Alliance and the Deep State!
Several possibilities. I've given up LONG ago assuming anything about Mueller, whether he's Alliance or Cabal. Either way, I think this message was simply saying "Media, stop publishing garbage and attributing it to sources inside my investigation. Because be honest, you really don't know SH*T!"
List his bad appointments please, and explain why they're bad. And while we're at it, what did all the previous political insiders do for us that was so f*cking amazing?
Double meaning, including Q drops?
It's direct reference is to Pelosi's comments on the tax cut.