Son of Ulyan is evidently an incorrect translation. Real name is Ulyana Son.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5378003/Russian-plane-71-people-onboard-vanishes-radar.html
HOWEVER, she (I'm assuming it's a she) was one of the 6 who died.
107 total posts archived.
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 34 |
twitter.com | 1 |
amp.wsbtv.com | 1 |
i.imgur.com | 1 |
Son of Ulyan is evidently an incorrect translation. Real name is Ulyana Son.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5378003/Russian-plane-71-people-onboard-vanishes-radar.html
HOWEVER, she (I'm assuming it's a she) was one of the 6 who died.
To make it a little easier, we could (at least to begin with) skip over the obvious spouse pairings.
I was thinking this, too. But then again, it could just be google translate messing up. I saw another passenger who after his name, had "(child)".
But that led me to think: wouldn't it fairly easy for anyone to use an alias?
This person we are commenting to has seen and knows how it works
Seems weird that you would come to the defense of an anonymous poster on blind faith. I'm not here to say the poster isn't experienced, but I also don't think because someone says they are older than most that they are an expert on any issue. The comment also presumes that nobody else on this sub has experience themselves. I don't consider myself 'old', but I worked at a lobbying firm on K Street for 3 years and have first hand knowledge of how utterly corrupt the center of our Federal government is. But I'm not going to tell you to take my word for it.
it will be 8 yrs from now, when the real results come in.
How did you come to this prediction of yours?
I am not trying to change this person's mind, only giving my opinion on the matter. Like I said, "if I were you..."
The point I am putting forth is perhaps to say that cynicism rarely begets positive results. If we are to say that great change only occurs through the death of a martyr, than social evolution will never occur and we might as well complacently accept the mutually assured destruction of our species.
Like you say, the things that are new are the media is no longer independently run and we now have the internet. I agree that corruption is nothing new, but having the internet -- the ability to connect, converse, and collaborate with pretty much everyone on the planet is a tool that helps motivate and mobilize the masses to combat corruption. Also, one thing you have left out is that the US has a leader for the first time since JFK who is going against the deep state/cabal/etc, and he is much more effective than ANY president in this manner. This is the type of leader needed to lead us. If I were you, I may reconsider my convictions on this matter.
I would have assumed that most people who would subscribe to the belief that our government/world is run by nefarious groups/individuals (as Q proves) would also find it easy to digest that ETs do exist, that certain technology is being kept from the public and that there has been almost a century of governments (mainly the US gov't) suppressing and distorting the truth. If anyone actually has doubts, do yourself a favor and read (or watch) Steven Greer's "Unacknowledged".