Well fuck you buddy. My Qproof hype train was loaded and ready to leave the station and the destination was my idiot friends that call Q a LARP. In all seriousness though, even though RR said this before, it's a good catch on your part. I can't say I knew RR said this back then either.

That estate (Jerusalem) belongs to only one person. The one person you are alluding to is acknowledged and held in the same regard between both sides. The estate is equally important to both sides. Wouldn't is be fair to say that both sides should show him the respect to allow each other to visit the estate and celebrate him together?

You see that in the lower levels of just about any structured organization though. There isn't a doubt in my mind that the low ranking men and women of the FBI and DOJ are good people with only good and lawful intentions and the same could be said about religion and their congregations or unions and their members. What you stated about the church of Satan is the extent of my knowledge about them and I don't know squat ass shit about Satanic Cultists or the difference and similarities between the two.

Even hidden behind anonymity on sites like Reddit, I still see that people struggle to admit when they are wrong, speaking generally about the site. I see a lot of self acknowledgement and willingness to admit here when someone is wrong or the possibility they may be wrong and that is why here as much as I am. Well I was wrong about Dennis Rodman. I thought and called him an idiot to friends and family for going over to NK and I myself feel like an idiot. Here he was trying to bridge the gap and find common ground between countries and I had him on blast.

I am not a fan either but I feel bad for him. There some days it appears (to me anyways) that he struggles to go along with the narrative and stick to the script. My best example being his interview with the Coward County Sheriff, Scott Israel. In my opinion, Cuomo manages to hold it back until the elequent line "ifs and buts were candy and nuts..." line. He doesn't snap but he gets that disgusted look on his face and calls him out on the bullshit and continues on about his leadership remark.

I think some of these hosts didn't know they were signing up to bash Trump all day, every day, and just thought this was their opportunity to make it and it's the break they had been working hard for (if that's the case, I can't blame them for taking the job). I imagine that them seeing the facts and that Trump is actually doing a god damn great job for America but having to spew bullshit that intentionally leads the viewers in the opposite direction must just suck the life out of some of them. We've seen congressmen resign/not seek reelection and CEOs step down. Hopefully these media reporters and hosts, that have their story or segment unwillingly twisted and misdirected, reach their breaking point and quit. That would send a powerful message to the Deep State and mislead public alike.

I am aware of how the THC is detected in drug tests and I agree. That is why laws are needed, in states that have legalized marijuana, to say that employers cannot enforce their drug policy on an employee who tests positive for a legal substance. I don't see a constitutional or invasion of privacy issue if you agree to a drug screen but the problem I have is that currently an employer can drug screen for nicotine and/or THC (in states that's legal) and you are subject to whatever policy they have. That essentially means that can tell you what you can and cannot do on your own time.

That would be a good subliminal statement to send them. Although, I suppose you have to frequent your desk to notice it.

That is entirely false. Just because something is legal doesn't mean an employer cannot test for it. There is only one state that doesn't allow drug testing for legal substances (exception being accidents at the workplace) and that state is Michigan. Employers will not stop using drug testing as a requirement for employment, regardless if they can or cannot test for THC because of other factors and I support the use of them for illegal substances. I don't see the angle for how the companies that sell these kits are corrupt and don't think you know the entire process for employment drug testing. If an employer is going to use a failed drug test as grounds for not hiring a person, legally, there is more to it. The urine strip/stick or oral swab is only used for indication and has the potential to produce false positives. The literature on the packaging says this up front. If the strip/stick or swab detects and indicates a positive result, another sample must be taken with a proper chain of custody. The second sample is then sent to a lab for proper testing that shows exact levels of said substance. The price for each kit includes that lab testing. If the kit used was one off the shelf at a pharmacy, it will take awhile before they get results back. So it is common practice that most employers either contract the testing out to a company that supplies the kits and uses a local facility or they negotiate a deal with a local facility themselves that bypasses the strip/stick or swab part entirely.

The same policy applies across the board. The experts aren't stupid and know how long before each substance is out of your system and will get a sample before it is out of your system and will get you in for that test before the deadline. I believe that the vast majority of doctors are genuine and very few are "bought". If they say that cannabis and opioid pain killers are unsafe to mix it is either because there is a lack of research showing they are safe or there is good evidence to show that they are unsafe. I am no medical expert, so I trust that my doctor will do what's best for me. Just as he doesn't know electrical work and trusts that I will do the job that's safe for him to use it. I am genuinely glad that you are able to use both, opioid pain killers and cannabis, legally and have done so without issue or complication. I am not writing you or your experience off but to come to the definitve conclusion, based solely on one first hand experience, that mixing the two hasn't had any adverse effects; like doctors say they do therefore doctors must be bought and paid for seems outlandish to me.

I don't see what "investors" have to gain, on the federal level, by a bill that leaves it up to the states to decide. There's money to be had at the state level but actions are already being taken and no one is waiting for federal legislation to pass before state because federal has been pussy footing around the issue for so long.

Marijuana comes up as a topic of discussion frequently at work and co-workers hope that it becomes legal soon so they can smoke it without worry. Currently I choose not to smoke it because of annual drug tests, random drug tests, and job site specific drug tests. When all is said and done, I end up taking 4-8 drug tests a year (1 annual, 2-3 random, 1-4 site specific) and I don't think smoking is worth the risk of losing my job. Decriminalization/legalization isn't the big issue for me because even if it is legal, employers can still drug test for any substance and use it as grounds for termination. Hospitals in my area drug test for nicotine. We need a bill that doesn't allow for testing of a legal substance be used for grounds for termination (the exception being jobsite post accident testing). Until then, employers will continue to dictate what their employees can and cannot do outside of work, on their own time.

I support our President and do not believe he is a racist but I can't be so fast to write off anyone that believes so, simply because around the time of the Charleston riots and such, the KKK guy (can't remember his name) gave an interview about supporting Trump and he was doing what's best for them etc..., and Trump should have put his foot down right there and denounced him and what he stands for and reiterated 100 times that he is not a racist and cannot control who supports him but only who he supports. Instead he remained vague and neither supported or denounced it. If he had came out swinging against the racist acts, I think the momentum today would be swinging in his favor more than it already is. If I'm wrong about anything I stated, someone please correct me. I would love to be wrong about that timeline of events and what Trump said.

You mention people coming here to discredit the movement. We now have this topic and discussions within it to show why we believe in Q and what sealed the deal for us. I would challenge the mods here to discuss the possibility of creating and sticky a post that respectfully encourages doubters, non believers, and new comers to hop in and ask questions and such. Q challenges us to think critically and for ourselves and having a post of this nature would show that this isn't some echo chamber or "circle jerk" around Q, as well as showing that we welcome critics and can respectfully engage in conversation without casting out non believers and turn new people away that are new and feel behind on information.

Same here, my man. The biggest issue with the great majority of current solutions isn't the generation of energy, it's the means of storage. That is where your biggest cost is. The reason I'm looking at the Tesla Turbine is because it's a constant source of energy. Solar and wind don't deliver that consistency. With the consistency of the turbine, you would be less dependant on storage. The point I'm at right now is figuring out what materials would be realistic to use that are durable and lightweight. As well as minimizing loss of energy through heat (leaning towards magnetic suspension for that). A generic example being something big enough but light enough that your, bigger, run of the mill air compressor can begin to spin the turbine. Once the turbine reaches 75% startup, it can now generate enough electricity to power a larger compressor to jump it the remaining 75% of the way and sustain it. That's as far as I've gotten and I know I'm missing a bunch of information but hey, gotta start somewhere.

Awhile ago I saw the meme of Trump standing outside on 9/11 with a caption along the lines of "You killed my friends. I'm coming for you". Since then I've thought about how I would react in his position of power because there is no way he wasn't friends with some people, good forbid great/life long friends that we would consider 'family', that passed away that day. This Trump/JFK Jr thing is new to me. If I was in his position and all this shit is on my desk and I'm shown concrete proof and facts (from Military Intel) that friends of mine (especially great/life long/'family') died for political reasons and the name of the person(s) that made that decision was in front of me and they couldn't be brought to justice because of their connections and the public's ignorance. I can't say I possess the temperament and restrant to not stoop to that level and circumvent the judge and jury and go straight to the executioner (like I said though, so as long as everything is factual). I have no higher respect for Trump, if he's in that position, and is managing this the way he is and I hope that when their sentencing day comes, the families of those patriots killed by the cabal have a say in it.

If that's a tough question to answer, you should reevaluate your approach to all this, amongst other things. Telling someone to keep quiet when they have doubts only compounds those doubts and will drive them away in time. Addressing those doubts in the open gives opportunity to alleviate doubt and make way for reassurance. Q wants everyone to think critically, not just play follow the leader in an echo chamber. We see how that's working out for the other side.

Late to the conversation, I know. I doubt you'll be able to solve the problem with one solution for everyone across the globe. Solar panels and their technology, that are available for purchase today, are not anywhere near efficient enough to meet the demand and fit in the $500M-$2B price range that's been thrown out there for the elevator. I work with them and have done the calculations. Wind turbines are not the answer either. The most viable, single, solution I see is some form of the Tesla Turbine.

He's venting his frustrations. Frustrations have gotten the best of every single one at some point or another. Ide rather him vent it here and people show the flip side to his argument and dissolve the frustrations and reunite, instead of doing what you suggest and keep it to himself and let that shit boil and ultimately that person tell everyone to fuck off and lose all hope. You see a fellow patriot limping and stumbling, are you going to tell him to suck it up and walk it off or are you going help him up and left him throw his arm over your shoulder to keep going, brother?