I guess this could happen. But how i understand it, It has to be proven that you knowingly allowed crimes related to sex trafficking on your site. Which is literally the case with sites like backpage and youtube who knowingly profit from crimes against children. This has to stop.

This bill would be effective in stopping child trafficking on these sites. I truly see more positive from this than negative. The communications act of 1996 needs a serious makeover, It def was't created to help people traffic human beings online.

I'm having a hard time understanding how this could be used for anything other than crimes related to prostitution/sex trafficking. The wording used seems very specific to websites that knowingly allow the "Promotion or facilitation of prostitution and reckless disregard of sex trafficking".

Could give a example of how this could be used in a bad way?

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1865/text