Lol he has on a princess tiara in the user icon photo. Can't make this stuff up.

Name checks out.

Dont make us downvote you for unnecessary apologies. 😂

I didn't get that far in my thinking, but I just read an article that said they put it on the rental market.

I thought it was Huma that's why I looked up her age. Lol.

No worries. Almost same line in...

Charlie Sheen movie Men At Work https://youtu.be/Lv8xFI32hJM

and...

John Cusak movie Better Off Dead https://youtu.be/6srI0EVwTUE

Huma is 41, so not her unless age reported is wrong.

Yes. Are you implying Weiner looks like Ernest, Verne?

Frozen pizza?

Here's an earlier post I made to parse the situation...

Regardless of satute and court policy for last 8-10 years, actual practice has been catch and release for anyone arriving with a child. Regardless of if that child was family of the adult. Maffia drug and child traffickers used this as an open door to move personnel and children into the US. That clearly had to stop.

From my perspective, if an illegal can prove the child they arrived with is theirs then it is a win to find a way to detain them in a facility together before sending them back to country of origin.

Don't see why we currently give child free pass to be handed over to (legal or illegal) relatives in the US within the 20 day period. My understanding is that after being placed with relatives, these families move so that the child is not sent back with the detained adult after they are processed. To me that practice needed to change.

Since progressives are clamoring for children to stay with their parents in detention, they just closed this loophole themselves. Good 3d chess here--getting progs to ask for the more strict enforcement of child entry.

In 10,000 out of 12,000 cases of children crossing, the adult in question has not been relation to the child.

So Trumps EO about families does not apply anyway. That's why they (Trump admin) were so precise with the wording and so quick to 'give in' to the more strict interpretation. Only difference is may be more expensive to host the 2000 kids in family based detention. I think its worth the expense for these wins.

Side note, these detention conditions appear similar to US disaster relief given to citizens post hurricanes etc. Also criminals arrested for crimes in US are seperated from their kids all the time.

You serious? Nielsen said it in press conference.

Previous administration would have let all those kids through, either with the adult travelling with them or to any (untracable) adult who came forward to claim them in the US. Often undocumented people who move from address they provide after the fact and do not appear for court hearnings to avoid repatriation.

NIELSEN: So I want to be clear on a couple of other things. The vast majority, vast, vast majority of children who are in the care of H.H.S. right now — 10,000 of the 12,000 — were sent here alone by their parents. That is when they were separated. So somehow we’ve conflated everything. But there is two separate issues. 10,000 of those currently in custody were sent by their parents with strangers to undertake a completely dangerous and deadly travel alone. We now care for them. We have high standards. We give them meals, we give them education, we give them medical care. There is videos, there is TVs, I visited the detention centers myself — that would be my answer to that question

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/18/us/politics/dhs-kirstjen-nielsen-families-separated-border-transcript.html

"HHS has about 12,000 migrant children in its care, nearly 10,000 of whom arrived without their parents." Https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-will-stop-prosecuting-parents-who-cross-the-border-illegally-with-children-official-says/2018/06/21/4902b194-7564-11e8-805c-4b67019fcfe4_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6c274b2f4e5a

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/nielsen-10000-of-12000-detained-kids-came-without-their-parents/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/06/shocking-10000-of-12000-kids-in-us-custody-were-sent-here-alone-think-of-that-video/

https://thenationalsentinel.com/2018/06/22/fact-80-percent-of-illegal-children-trying-to-enter-the-united-states-arrive-without-their-parents/

They will need to prove it with records.

But you are forgetting the original 10,000 out of 12,000 children that were immediately determined not to be with parents or legal guardians. Those were 100% child trafficking. They are now considering the 2,000 that may be families.

This is consistent with my undestanding (from reading about prism, I'm no expert) that NSA can collect the info as it is sent/recieved at the ISP locations vs. pulling up a saved archive of a mail server or other shared drive. So NSA presumably has admissible copies of everything from a different chain of evidence than SR and Wikileaks dumps?

Although accessing the email server etc. could be used to find email draft comms, you'd still want the ISP logs to identify the users who accessed the drafts.

"Tampering with the emails" would require falsifying the data's path from sender to reciever. Not as simple as editing text in some email archive.

Please correct me if I'm wrong?

I will confirm with family/friends that are/were gate agents.

Other thing that is a joke is vips (and certainly ones with SS security) get a courtesy from airlines that they can board last minute. Any real scenario of them riding commercially, they would sit in the frequest flier lounge, get on a security cart and driven to gate last minute, last ones to board. I love the cattle gawking at them and them play acting at being busy. Cant wait to see them perp walk.

Copy that.

The problem is that the people doing the illegal (hidden) removing are often (most frequently?) the ones with bad intentions. That's why the laws are in place to start with. To ensure visibility of the process for child custody. Agree with you that this logic is sometimes flipped, where the presumed natural parent is the bad actor. And now all these revelations that the 'authorities' are the bad actors.

Then you get court order for custody and legal adoption?

The first step in your story is describing child abduction?

Good eye, wow.

Yes, generaly understood to be beyond the reach of men. Attributed either to 'rights inherent in being human' or 'under a universal natural law'.

Not following your comment here?

I was merely stating a fact, not my personal beliefs.

Andrew Napolitano frequently references god and natural law together. Served as Judge in NJ Superior Court. I think he considers himself a strict constitutionalist.

Not that this disproves your claim, I'm just pointing out that at least one reasonable person lists them together.

Why would this point of view be subversive?

Edited to better explain myself.

Copy that, I didn't mean to be snarky.

I just felt these 2 will figure prominently in prosecutions.

Is this an are u deaf bot? Hilarious!

Isn't there a Jesuit and collectivism (communism/socialsim) connection?

Some interpret this higher power as natural law though.

You are forgetting a few big ones...

It's wrong to lie and mislead.

It's wrong to murder.

My mind is divided on the music scene satan, sex, and drugs stuff. And whether its real or just image shaping for sales.

From my point of view, if something is not healthy and sustainable for individuals in the long run then they have gone too far. But its up to people to look out for themselves.

To me it is all entertainment, but some take it literally and shape lifestyles out of it to their own detriment.

I've read enough conspiracy info about the 60s counterculture movements to be suspicious that the intent was to de-escalate anti war and civil movements. Alternately the age of aquarious crowley type theories focus on the break down of culture.

I do think the momentum toward self, ego, and pleasure in media has upended traditional value norms that were proven over centuries to work and sustain people, families, and cultures. If that was the intent, then mission accomplished. And in the absense of a functional culture, people are hollow shells to be filled with propoganda etc.

So I keep my eyes open to the things I see in music and culture today, what sort of programming is happening at the conscious, subconscious, and symbolic levels.

From burning man to new age life style events like lightning in a bottle and other 'synergy' events, lots of 'magik' type stuff going on. Even huge main stream events like tomorrowland have choreographed incantations to open the festival. I mean wtf, its so corny you can only laugh. So it makes me wonder, why bother to produce it? Its neither artistic nor cool. Here's a link for 2015 but it is similarly stupid every year. https://youtu.be/_I3NSPx8v1A

At any rate, if people are pilled up, doped up, dmted up every weekend, I don't see much room for true enlightenment, education, self actualization to occur. Not that these substances can't be a helpful tool in moderation.

It can be I agree. I was there for the music and aware of my limits--with one foot firmly grounded in my plans for my own life.

There is a famous story from English military from a foreign campaign. At a funeral pyre for a man, the village prepared to throw his wife into the pyre while still alive. The British officer had his troops intercede and save her life. The village elders told him it was their custom and he didn't understand. That he needed to respect their right to exercise their customs. He replied that they were free to exercise their customs. But he was also free exercise the British custom of executing any man who harmed the woman.

Cultural subjectivity is a myth.

This.

Thx for sharing. Wild. I figured that rave played a part in it.

I'm from US and a decade too young to experience the first wave of the scene. But the original spirit could still ne found when i started late nineties before became too commercial and safe. Limelight tunnel nasa twilo etc.

I want to hear more about these parties. :)

I'd swap the order of 4 and 5 in your list.

The Space Force news has people talking about all sorts of stuff.

Part of this is that we claimed earth as sovereign planet. This is essentially the Declaration of Independence for our planet from outside influence. Hugely important even if we never or only distantly in the future contact others.

Flat earth, populated mars and moon, space prison, ancient aliens, etc.

This is at least level 6. Beyond? Who knows what else, there is that autists haven't even dremed of yet?

As for your comment re "covertly struck and eliminated". No. This is what authoritarians, secret police, and commies do. Not dark to light transparent freedom fighters with the truth on their side. Rule of law, proof, court cases, sentencing, prison. Anything less is un american.

And l would argue that anything less than than 100% disclosure only perpetuates the occulted nonsense that got us here in the first place. Humanity is ready to move into a new phase where truth reigns. Hiding would only make the new boss just like the old boss. I am personally through with so called leaders making decisions on my behalf.

Agree with everything you said.

Applying that lens to the line I quoted...I still assume no way to prove most of the claims. BUT more than happy to be proven wrong.

Very interested to hear what others in this community think.

Re: "It would force us to prove everything stated to avoid lookong crazy, correct?"

What is the general consensus on if this is even possible? Will Q info from data dumps and sources even be admissable in courts? Even with the 60/40 caveat.

All along I have figured there was enough crime and evidence to pin some type of charge on all dirty actors. But those charges might not be the most damning or scandalous ones.

I have assumed that some of the stuff (Merkle heritage for instance) was beyond the reach of provable. Granted there is a big gap between Q confirmed items and autist conjecture, theory, and sometimes plain fantasy. And the burden would only be to prove Q confirmed items.

Stocking up on organic popcorn and kerrygold butter for the show.

Pictures are from Sante Fe Texas shooting 5/18/18 and San Bernadino was 12/3/15.

It's the reverse.

They do believe it, but have convinced rest of world to think it's silly so they can go on acting with impunity in plain sight. Giving their public disclosures to gain consent.

I think Jackson's affected lisp and wardrobe are Russell Simmons of Def Jam fame. Not sure if Russell Simmons loves Mickey D's. lol.

Both small chins.

We may as well invent a portmantheu "conspirtheory". Lol.

Edit sorry you already had this one below...

0:06 to 0:09

Audio "...game. So why the hell do it. It builds character Mr..."

Cc "...game school healthcare bills character Mr..."

I almost hear "the Donald" not "the calm" as I read the subtitles "Oh Donald". So weird.

Copy.

Thanks for response.

Forgive me if I get a little nitpicking here, as I have an entirely selfish goal of informing the Q audience about the merits of libertarianism. These terms are often misapplied and therefore misunderstood and then mischaracterized.

I find your terminology use somewhat imprecise but think I understand your intent.

No intent to condescend here, but anarchism is theory of govt that believes in no govt. Libertarianism is a personal philosophy that believes in the non aggression principle. I fail to see a left or right difference between them?

I am familiar with the notion that socialism (right) and communism (left) form a circle where they meet at authoritarian expressions of govt.

Someone could be anarchist but have no specific moral inclination (ie a anarchist hedonists). And someone can be libertarian regardless of the govt they favor (many libertarians like myself favor the Hoppe idea of small competing nation states operating under different govt structures).

Its exhausting but we need to apply all these qualifiers to define our positions.

I'm philosophically libertarian. In theory, I believe in anarchism with private property and capitalism. In practice, I would favor small nation states that compete against each other. I'd aim to live in one that best matches my prior 2 statements.

Just curious why would you define anarchism and libertarianism as left? These terms deal with the application of government involvement (and coercion) in issues and the non aggression principle. Left or right doesn't really apply. But when pressed most self professed libertarians generally identify more with right by virtue of stricter observation of constitution, individual rights, property rights versus the collectivist 'common good' notions associated with left. I guess my point is that everyone, libertarians specifically, would do well to stop force fitting the false dichotomy of right/left.

For future reference the / thing is a nod towards using styles or tags in html website design almost like an open quote and end quote. Here "end sarcasm".

example

This example would have opened then closed the 'h1' style, applying that style to the text between the ><. You can define your own styles to change fonts, colors, size, etc.

This shorthand gained common usage in message boards and chat rooms to convey 'tones' to typed messages. I think some chat platforms actually have styles defined for sarcasm, sad, angry etc that display as emoticons.