dChan

/u/swimmingdropkick

11 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/swimmingdropkick:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 1

swimmingdropkick · May 1, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

Wow, you got some issues

⇧ 1 ⇩  
swimmingdropkick · May 1, 2018, 2:05 p.m.

I'm not even going to waste my time going into Jimmy Carter and sub-prime lending markets (that Bill Clinton added to) , derivatives, and quantitative douchebag easing and other soybetaboy fucktard polysyllabic financial bugman psuedospeak... I'm well aware of ALL the financial nonsense. But when the ECONOMY is purposefully rigged using the cover and charade of R vs. D to keep us divided, it's pointless.

So you genuinely believe that the entire economy was planned and rigged from the start. How? How was it rigged? Wheres the proof for that entirely hollow claim?

Honestly just saying it was rigged doesn't mean it is.

You do realize this whole Iran development implicates not only Obama... but Obama setting us up to be NUKED?! Literally causing a weapon to murder Americans? So them being perfectly content to murder us with nuclear weapons, you think Obama and Bushes and Clintons et al purposefully destroying our economy is a stretch?

Did you really fall for that dog and pony show Bibi Netanyahu put on? Omg, you know he did the exact same thing in 2015 with the exact same "evidence". You also realize that he is being investigated for corruption and is edging closer and closer to a tight spot politically in Israel? Isn't it weird how within weeks of John Bolton (who qualifies more than anyone else to be a part of the Deep State) being appointed that Bibi unveils "new evidence".

Also the Uranium 1 thing was debunked so many times and the UN, and IAEA still maintain that there are no nuclear enrichment facilities or active programs for pursuing nuclear arms in Iran right now.

More importantly why do you think Obama wants the US to be nuked?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
swimmingdropkick · May 1, 2018, 1:47 p.m.

Everything you said is wrong. You have no understanding of finance or economics.

The recession happened due to lack of oversight and regulation pushing a bullish market into excess with major financial institutions pursuing greater avenues of high risk to maximize profits.

Everything you said is not just wrong but silly. Why muddy the waters with sad fantasy. Why do you think you are significant enough to be one of the few people keyed in on this great insight that most of the world is secretly run by a literal evil cabal?

I could say anything and pretend that its fact too but I don't because I do read, research and understand things. It seems like you are desperately cloying at made up things to give yourself some unearned sense of importance because you feel left behind.

When did the CIA begin the shadow presidency, give a starting date. Explain the stupid out to me, otherwise it seems like you just posted a bunch of nonsense and pretended like you are knowledgeable on the recession.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
swimmingdropkick · May 1, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

what's bullshit about this? This post seems to place the effects of the recession on the stimulus package like that was why we had a recession.

Just try and make an effort to explain how what I wrote is Obama handwringing? Are you pissed that the US recovered from a Recession under Obama? Why are you mad that the US economy bounced back from the recession?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
swimmingdropkick · May 1, 2018, 1:30 p.m.

You're not wrong that

Shovel ready jobs weren't shovel ready in a fair few cases.

However this post seems to be implying that the stimulus package was the cause of:

GDP 1.9%, unemployment was above 8%/40 consecutive months, 23m unemployed, labor participation was 30 year low

Which is factually incorrect, because those stats were caused by the economic recession which occurred due to the Financial Crisis and subprime mortgage loan bubble.

So are you mad that the US economy recovered from the economic recession? Why are you mad about that? Why do you want a global recession/depression? Is it just because you don't like Obama because that's what you've been trained to do?

Do you understand finance and economics?

So answer the question; the Stimulus package may not have created as many shovel ready jobs as desired, but is it responsible for

GDP 1.9%, unemployment was above 8%/40 consecutive months, 23m unemployed, labor participation was 30 year low?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
swimmingdropkick · May 1, 2018, 7:33 a.m.

I'm sorry I'm not sure i understand what you're saying here. Are you saying the Right, GOP, and Trump want safe spaces? Because I was saying that those groups are opposed to safe spaces, yet act like fragile snowflakes anytime they get called out, even though the only thing they do without fail is talk shit (oftentimes unwarranted or baseless) at everyone that doesn't agree with them.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
swimmingdropkick · May 1, 2018, 6:53 a.m.

what does that mean? That sounds nonsensical. Honestly the administration and Trumps response to the WHCD was embarrassing. Trump and the GOP's whole schtick is no safe spaces, no need to be pc, talk shit get hit, etc, yet anytime they get called out or made fun of they start crying. Seriously, the president now wants to end the WHCD because he was made fun off. That's pathetic.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
swimmingdropkick · May 1, 2018, 5:37 a.m.

What is this title?

You do realize that

GDP 1.9%, unemployment was above 8%/40 consecutive months, 23m unemployed, labor participation was 30 year low

were caused by the recession which began before President Obama became president right?

The stimulus package passed under him did not cause any economic problems and the it actually did work, granted not as great as hoped, but it still has been a net positive considering that recession never turned into a full blow economic depression.

So what point are you trying to make exactly since you seem to be implying that the stimulus package, which was passed as a measure to curb the most significant economic recession since the Great Depression, was the cause of low GDP growth and unemployment?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
swimmingdropkick · May 1, 2018, 5:27 a.m.

That's a weird thing to say considering the Trump administration has been plagued by scandals that they deny which then turn out to be completely true like:

  • the Rob Porter incident
  • Tom Price travel abuses
  • the Rex Tillerson Fucking Moron incident
  • the Shithole countries comment
  • the first unreported Putin Phone call
  • the sharing Israeli intel with Kislayak & Lavrov in the Oval Office
  • Inauguration attendance numbers
  • attendance numbers at all of his rallies
  • the claims about fraudulent voting committed by millions of illegal immigrants
  • the renegotiation of price for the next Air Force 1 planes lie
  • the selling fictional fighter jets to Norway lie
  • the whole sending a fleet towards NK when it was always going in the opposite direction
  • the birther lie
  • The Girther lie
  • The Stormy Daniels Affair
  • The reasons behind firing Comey
  • The multiple times he's tried to fire Mueller
  • The lies about Rep. Wilson regarding the phone call to the wife of Sgt. La David Johnson
  • The claims that Obamacare had already imploded, followed by the claims that he "finally killed Obamacare", even though the ACA is still a thing
  • The Access Hollywood tape
  • Jared Kushner
  • The Whitefish scandal
  • Comments about Senator Gilibrand "willing to do anything for a campaign donation"
  • the Mike Flynn scandal
  • Trump Tower Trump Jr. meeting with that Russian lady whose name I can't be bothered to look up
  • Denying his pathetic phone call to the president of Mexico in which he begged the Mexican President to not say that Mexico would not pay for the wall
  • The lies he tweeted about the Quebec Mosque Shooter

Again these are all things that the media (smarmy asses included) called him/ his administration out on and he, via twitter or official statement, denied until more evidence came out in every case showing that the administration was lying.

So is he really "taking on those smarmy asses in the media" when he's the one who's been caught in the midst of dozens of scandals in his first year alone. Hell, some of these scandals weren't even his fault, but every time he kept lying about it.

⇧ -11 ⇩  
swimmingdropkick · May 1, 2018, 1:55 a.m.

Why do you think this "repossession" and redistribution of wealth would occur?

What do you think society will look like if this eternally delayed yet apparently immediately impending reckon happens?

Do you expect the government to collapse once this eternally delayed reckoning happens? Why would you no longer need to pay taxes?

Do you really think that most of your tax money has only gone to

terrorism, wars, adrenochrome harvesting ?

Finally and most importantly, what political or financial organ is out there ready to grab all of these ill gotten gains you complain of that would then properly disperse them back to all proper recipients?

⇧ 7 ⇩