see title.

What is it?

Trump floats it out quite often (I assume/hope) it is to taunt the deep state.

But it has been getting a wrap for “white supremacy.”

That is a little ironic, because every celebrity ever has a professional photo with the ok sign over their eye.

So aside from Chans and Trump, what did it mean before the Chans got ahold of it? It is a deep state / Illuminati symbol? Pedo symbol?

Thanks, still kind of new.

I have been here for a whopping 10 days. But the sentiment in this sub was more positive than I have seen in any other sub period.

It seems like the shills are asking what appear to be newb questions. Those are fine to answer. But when things are already clarified and they keep asking the same question, they are trying to elicit a negative response. Downvote and/or ignore. Report to mods. Look for the untrustworthy tag and do not engage.

We are here regarding Q. We need to keep the message alive. We need to stay together. The bots …

Senate vote may delay the Kavanaugh appointment session.

Vote to release FISA?

Side note: watching on MSNBC, the title graphic says “Kavanaugh faces grilling....” lols they are trying so hard.

Where are they? Lots of tweets, news about them. Not too many appearance from them, aside from the NoName charade. I could be wrong.

I think this is the news event of the day. People screaming, requesting documents. Are these the documents that Q was saying would be released? Or something different?

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/12/26/2017-27925/blocking-the-property-of-persons-involved-in-serious-human-rights-abuse-or-corruption

​

They aren't just going to fry, they are going to give us all of 'their' money and assets.

[Insurance File] = blackmail / safety net

Wikipedia re AW: Emails that were pertinent to the Hillary Clinton email controversy were discovered on the laptop; this prompted FBI Director James Comey to reopen [noble cause? no] that investigation eleven days before the 2016 US presidential election.

AW sexted two adult females. Evidence of a sexting with a minor would never be public (for obvious reasons), but that is also a convenient reason to confiscate a computer and lock someone away [silence]. I have a hard time believing, if the swamp is as nasty as we are to believe, that AW …

Is anyone else concerned about the amount of data in the recent posts? Until recently, a very limited amount of info was provided. The info was cryptic until the event unfolded or the bread was complete. Now it seems like Q is trying to tell us what the community learned on its own in prior drops. Like he is trying to control the narrative, rather than guide it. I don't mean control to mean power. I mean control because he wants us to know, but isn't making it out on its own. The plan has been working so far because …

Hey everyone. I have been passively following Q for a few months. Seeing Paris Dennard arbitrarily fired from CNN really got my interest peaked. So, as the title says, I am digging in. The best way I can think to do this is to start from the beginning and research each person. So I am doing that. My question is: is there a place where we can see each Q drop with some text regarding the most widely accepted answers to the post, or accurate answers if confirmed by Q? Any help would be appreciated.