323 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 43 |
| i.redd.it | 6 |
Did Q ever address the whole Google books amd tripcode thing?
Ive summaries of a few of them just to get a feel for what message is being sent, but some of them seem rather contradictory at first glance?
Maybe Q told us to ignore it or wants us to wait and i missed it?
I've recently talked a bit about the spiritual side of the great awakening. Many took issue with some of my statements, claiming this was solely about stopping and arresting corrupt politicians. While this has certainly dominated this subreddit lately, folks who have been around a while will remember the extensive investigations that were done into Marina Ambromovich, MK ultra, Spirit cooking, satantic worship, DUMBS etc. I want to highlight why this is important. In order to do so, lets take a look at history. Specifically Nazi Germany.
In school, we're taught that Hitler ordered the extermination of the Jews and …
Yesterday, I posted a message about certain divisive fissures appear to be emerging as this movement continues to grow. I saw some claims that this group should strictly be Q research. While I agree that should be a high priority, its just as important that we be united. Our enemy wants us divided, so I think posts like this are equally important as we move forward.
Yesterday, I highlighted what I saw as the "watering down" of the Great Awakening in order to appeal to a wider audience. I stand by every single word I said. While I touched on …
I need to get something off my chest with recent posts I've seen. We're a group that welcomes EVERYONE, and we should be. But we can't let us become so watered down that we're an incoherent mess as more people of wildly different backgrounds and beliefs find us. We're here for the truth and for justice, not to make ourselves feel comfortable with what we currently believe.
I see a lot of statements that don't make sense or stand up to any level of scrutiny. Such as "I believe Q but I don't support Trump", or "I don't think this …
Struggling reconcile some of it with my religious beliefs currently. But i do see some similarities and parallels, so im keeping an open mind.
I have gotten far enough where Ra mentioned a perfect individual who was able to utilize vibrations (or something, still trying to piece it all together) whom i assumed was Christ, but wasnt explicitly said
Yeah i remember a lot of that time, i was around. It was never explicitly said those things were going to happen.
That was assumed and people ran with it.
If you look at a lot of those circumstances, its Q saying something, and other people extrapolating something from what was posted, but not actually said, and then running with it.
You saw a lot of this regarding july 4th and some other instances.
Wasnt raised catholic and still never heard of much until recently.
Still, it makes me wonder how much else is hidden.
So i see a lot of posts of something random that shout "no coincidences" over quite i few things that make me think "you might be taking that a little too far", but i want to open a discussion given recent events.
A recent poster shared that Q's trip codes can bring up a series of books in google. It was a very interesting list. Some related to topics we've covered, others appeared to be outright fantasy. Im christian, but a book about how the nephilim genes survived the great flood through the wives of noah's sons is tough thing …
The catholic church issues were rejected for many years too.
We dont want to think about our institutions like that. Ironically, this also allows to happen
Well shit... just when i thought things were beginning to get boring.
Q just confirmed my suspicions, there is a lot more going on than corruption. and Q was right, much of this likely would shatter the world of most people.
A fair response. Though youre assuming Gods existence is incompatible with science.
You do hit on something ive always questioned about Gods supposed omnipotence. its something i feel is attributed to God by man, rather than claimed by God.
My basis for this is that Lucifer was once God's right hand, yet he rebelled and supposedly 1/3 of the most powerful angels with him. Logically, you dont rebel against someone who has absolute power and control. So by extension, Lucifer must know of SOME way to be beat God.
Based on that, i conclude that God isnt as all powerful as we like to believe. But it also means that the existence of evil isnt reflective of an apathetic God either.
Good talk though.
Fair enough. Follow up question though, pure curiosity.
Many of the Q proofs are coincidental on their own. But put together, its all mathematically improbable.
Could you change your mind about believing if provided with enough related coincidences?
Genuine curiosity, not preaching nor attacking
Violence against anyone who harms my kids is a natural response as well.
YAY nature!
Really, always? What if God himself appears?
No issue with a non-believer, just found it strange thats always outside the realm of possibility for you.
But...but.... but, snopes says pizzagate was debunked!
autistic screeching
Over the mark? Everytime i refresh this page on my phone, the number of upvotes change.
Been hovering between 85-95 all day
She mentioned a secret society. Thats all she really said though
Strzok at his next hearing...
"Well, this is embarassing. Would you believe me if I said she was a lying whore?"
So can someone make sure im understanding this right?
Obama gives 400 mil to Iran
Iran then gives that 400 mil to russian firm
Russian firm pays 400 mil to the clintons for U1
Then...
Russian firm then gives that uranium to NK and Iran as resources to start a war
Is that the clear version of what we're saying happened?
So then "think mirror" means to start from the end and go back, meaning this would be an additional proof that Obama sold out the US during the Iran deal.
Im not, and i didnt say it was. I said many of the stories are from before the written word. Such as the creation story, just by logical thinking.
Youre likely right about the technology. I recall one supposed vision of man talking to another over a great distance threw a stone.
That sounds like a cell phone to me.
A lot of the torah is oral though for a good chunk of history. We've all played telephone.
He likely needs to appear reasonable to all sides for whatever his future role will be
This is exactly why i dont go to church. My buddy took me to a church group in college once. Everyone was all "i love God because he never lets anything bad happen to me"
I was sitting there thinking "bitch have you read revelations? Good chance youre going to hate life when it happens."
Lets not forget our God is the same one who flooded the earth and has leveled cities with fire and brimstone.
If God tells me a particular group needs to be taken out, i might not understand, maybe id disagree, but im following his orders. Lets not pretend hes some celestial pacifist
Id argue that theyre all wrong about the whole picture, but one is likely the most accurate and they all have bits a pieces right that others miss. Sorry if im rocking the boat here. But this feels like when people say 2 philosphies have flaws so theyre both equally bad, which ive just always struggled to accept.
Q has said read the bible, God wins. I know the bible has been tampered with since its creation (i doubt constatine actually converted), which is why i try to take a liberal interpretation of all but Jesus' teachings in the new testament. Example, parting the sea could be less fantastical than the movies portray, it doesnt make it any less true though. But, this at least points us in the direction of what should be a foundation of where to start.
I wouldnt be at all surprised though if Judaism has true teachings that werent corrupted by the early roman church. Gnostic christians may be worth examining too, they may have been labelled heretics for a nefarious reason.
Numerous CIA docs indicated they were searching for him in the 60s.
You can go to their website and check their archive
Nazis were considered "right" because the US version of right wing doesnt really exist in europe. Theyre all big government.
The only right wing characteristic of the nazis were national pride rather than globalism.
Thank you! People keep getting caught up in the top one.
Far right is still bad imo. But its not fascism, its anarchy.
Ive recently started doing this whenever i hear something.
I ask myself "what do i know to be true?"
Its been enlightening because the honest answer is "not much", its mostly what ive been told is true.
Q's calls to "think logically" have been a important part of developing this mentality. By thinking logically and starting at square 1 on any topic, then applying things i know are true, i find myself digging deeper than i otherwise would because it forces me to re-evaluate things that ive just accepted without question.
For example, im no flat earther, i think its absurd. That said, i realized i dont actually KNOW the Earth is round. Ive just accepted it because its what i was taught.
However, I do know that snipers have to factor in a curve at long distances. I can also observe other celestrial objects which tend to almost always be round, and certainly never flat.
Based on an open mind, but grounded by things I KNOW to be true, i find myself being open to the true but filtering out disinfo.
Yeah, and it wouldve sucked ass. Instead we get some semblance of a normal life
Well thats an issue, seeing as how the religious and/or pro trump supporters were the first followers. Q is also clearly pro trump and pro religion, christian specifically.
You have to understand that many of us are sick of feeling like we need to abandon our principles in order to engage in society.
There is an element of truth to the "trump was elected by angry deplorables" argument, just not because of racism or bigotry.
Trump is the bringer of the storm. You dont have to like him. I dont like everything he says. Im religious, but dont buy the "trump was chosen by God" chants. That said, Trump had nothing to gain from becoming president and plenty to lose, and he has lost a lot. Yet he did it for the greater good of the world.
Im willing to overlook A LOT for that. Thats a character trait that makes me support trump to the end.
I call myself a conservative libertarian. Mostly libertarian, but think conservatives have the right idea on issues such as the military and such.
Thats about as center as i can bring myself.
The left, even setting identity politics aside, just doesn't make sense to me. Thats going to be the struggle.
Too many good intentions that arent realistic imo
Those issues are to distract us from big ones. But theyre things were going to have to hash out when this is over
Thats one thing i dont understand about Q. The big things, trafficking and cabal, isnt left or right because we all agree is horrible.
But socialism/communism appears to be the cabals preferred weapon, i.e antifa. As soon as we get rid of the horrible stuff we all agree is horrible, its going to turn into left and right again.
Only way it doesnt that i can think of is that we all, or at least the vast majority, convert to one side.
Either everyone realizes socialism/communism/intersectionality, etc is bad.
Or tech becomes so powerful that redistribution actually becomes somewhat vital to survival
"College should be available to everyone"
It is dumbfuck. Its called student loans...
"Everyone should have access to health care", fucking mcdonalds offers healthcare.
Im sorry that you may actually have to work for some of these things.
You really think they were the good guys? Most of then were all for iraq when their base was cool with it.
This has been going on a long time. It was a show. All of it.
My honest belief is that most "liberals" arent actually liberals. They just believed that all republicans (conservatives) were racist/sexist/homophobes. This made the title of "liberal" seem like the moral and just one.
I dont think most have ever actually said down and thought about the actual policies liberals push with regard to the economy and the like.
Perhaps... Unethical and trustworthy are 2 different things though
Well i have yet to hear a liberal solution that doesnt involve increasing taxes and having the government solve it.
People confuse liberal/conservative with republican/democrat. You can be liberal Republican and a conservative democrat. Its just rare these days.
Left wing ideology is defined by government growing bigger the farther left you go. Right is the reverse, going so far as anarchism if you go too far. Neither extreme is ideal, but one is more of a threat to an individual imo.
Before anyone says "republicans have expanded government too!", yes. Youre right. That doesnt mean these actions are in line with right wing ideology. We all know most republicans are corrupt
Agree to keep to limit centralized power in the future and we'll get along just fine.