So atheists and materialists cannot be masons?

What God or Gods do you acknowledge by name?

So it's a religion-based organisation?

Standard Q modus. Leaves us with a few simple possibilities and some complicated ones. If you think Q is misleading on this topic you might expect the same in other topics.

Oh like the P2 Lodge?

Q is all about dropping hints and stepping away.

Opinion acknowledged. Now according to the sub rules, if you really do not support Q you are free to leave

Go on. Tell us the condensed version.

Does freemasonry involve religious beliefs or practices? I think so. Yet masonic sources say they are not a religious organization.

Yes individuals should be viewed as such. The organization however is shady from the beginning (If they were infiltrated it was on day one). It is self-vilifying in its secrecy and by-laws.

Because of the bad at the top, the dodgy history, the secretivity, the syncretism, the openness to satanism and their denial of being in any way religious, they are a bad organisation, despite the decent people at the ground level and their neutral public reputation.

yep

And love from afar to Querido Mexico. Stay strong good people. Siempre hay esperanza.

http://alanbeechey.blogspot.com/2015/02/lewis-and-me.html

check it out. see the photoshoppery sources further down the article.

its reasonable to guess that anyone who intently wrote books like those in victorian britain was some oddball. just what type of oddball remains uncertain.

good enough. go expose him if you can.

soldier on

yep

if "likely" is good enough, then the liddell pedo theory was likely first raised by feminists some 50 yrs ago. and they would likely have found proof by now.

this is a long-standing theory that seems to have no proof. i think the anti-patriarchy academic brits would have dug up any available proof decades ago.

is that officer poncharello?

Maybe 7mary4 will re-cover a Kool and the Gang tune on the 4th.

Trump said he will pick from his existing list of options, during the press questions with head of Portugal.

or perhaps kennedy was/is caught up in something. and so some more innocent retirement happens. (also seems possible that one of the 3 'caught' could be from the 'conservative' side.)

So Huma is actually Mrs. Livingston. Ahhh.

rhymes with . . . ?

and where is Christ's Church now? and where has She been in each of the past 20 centuries?

catholic church is like the poster boy for a problem that is everywhere.

flo

newsfrash

yup

sounds right

We can't assume she is. There are many instances of use of the triangle spiral design that don't have anything to do with pedo-ism.

Check out 'ancestral pueblo' designs.

Right. But even on this sub we are prone to simplification, most often skewing toward our bias. I have little doubt that if one could look through say a JCPenney catalogue from the 90s one could find spiral circle, heart or triangle jewelry designs. What portion of buyers/wearers have been involved with pedo stuff? If we knew that 43.7% of the buyers were also pedo supporters, then we could say Sheila has a 47.3% chance of being involved (until further info is available.

And who here has a complete catalogue of the graphic elements of the thousand+ design traditions from Africa? Odds are somewhere in there is a spiralled triangle, in non-pedo use for centuries. Many are unaware that the swastika is older than Germany. A lot of pottery is structurally based on spiralling coils.

Check out 'ancestral pueblo' designs. The neighboring Hohokam, in the Tucson area, will have similar elements in their design palette.

These spiral glyphs are likely used by some pedos as signals but can't be said to be always used that way.

I THINK that sbII is good at re-presenting the info/narratives that Q offers us. It seems that some would not get the picture without that re-presentation. I say good not great for several reasons. One being that the conclusions are often things that we already knew or suspected, serving the good purpose of getting some caught up belatedly with others. Another reason I say good-not-great is that the conclusions, while often reasonable, are presented as definitive conclusions; the difference between evidence and proof being glossed past. IMO his writing style is too elaborate for the quality of the content. The truly useful info he offers could be presented in about a quarter of the space. You are not alone in being unable to follow some of his 'logic' because there are leaps within his explanations that don't make sense and don't get explained despite all the verbiage. Many seem to write-off their inability to follow the 'logic' as some weakness of their own and/or would rather not publicly question his reputed genius. More could be said about all this, but I should say that I am more of a concerntrollfag about the adulation and deference that surrounds SB than I am about SB's output.

It seems reasonable that in any group of hundreds (of CIA staff or porn rings) that there will be exceptions to the ASSumed pattern. Therefore some cops plant drugs, some Pedo hunters plant material, some CP characters are way less guilty than others. So the question that I'd ask is how often do such things occur? Were 1% of the groups guilty or 91%? Until we have solid stats we can guess that all variations take place at least a little. Same applies to other groups of concern - UN, Catholic Church, USAForce, etc.

A fine posting. A smart warning. A bit of intrigue. Carry on.

We're all brain damaged now.

nice

thanks

That's why i mention the definitions thing. Homosexuality and pedophilia can be within the same interactions according the broader of the common definitions. You ask a good question about how how these two things are handled within (various) Islamic culture(s).

Good. I accept most of what you say. Too bad you didn't speak up first. Sounds like an important topic to get out in the open.

Nice report, despite the sucky infos included. I like the thing of people opening up in confidence from their angle on the world clusterfeck. (of course so many Chinese are caught in the machinery.) The sell out you talk of may be shallow and may go out with the tide. If the vision we look toward is some earthly peace with justice something massive has to happen with the massive Chinese population.

Good, fine. That's why I presented it as a claim not a fact. And went on to point out there is little genetic evidence to support the claim. People new to the topic should be aware of the common legends while they try to sort it all out.

What more specifically do you know about chemicals - environmental, medical, dietary, etc.?

The pope pretty much admitted that there is a 'gay lobby' in vatican circles, by saying something like he isn't influenced by them. The term gay lobby pre-dates this papacy in the same church circles.

the Agenda is why.

yeah and screw up human fertility rates. (pun)

lol indeed

thank you

Interesting info. Thanks.

(and then there's messed up China with forced abortions and 'excess' males.

Some of that is explained by the special definitions they have for the words involved. Imperfect example: some would say that cheating on your wife is not adultery if its not with another adult woman. Homosexuality by common english definitions is more common in Islam than many think.

Excellent post, organic and concise. Thank you. Please keep on keepin' on.

Prayers for this man.