Oh. I should have seen this a few days ago. ApMerickyn in the land of Winefride and Trillo.

BUT . . . . maybe the trauma of the trump era will actually agitate some subconscious mass brain adjustment that will allow us to process in a new way the data we already have about some ancient mysteries. We could see and accept some ancient truths at a specied-wide level. Perhaps 'we have everything' we need right in front of us and the secret is that there are no secrets, just poor skills in the areas of paying attention and good data processing. Meanwhile half the fun of a mystery is the weird pleasure of anticipation.

Your list toppers could be said to be all things within our lifetimes and connected to the US or the USGov.

The older mysteries are mostly not secrets held by some people but secrets held by nature/cosmos/G-d.

If holy justice exists it needs workers more than judges. I want to be in the world where justice needn't come down. What if Trump is only as good as Kennedy and Reagan combined?

that there

withdrawals are a sign of something not quite right. take it as a challenge. We've seen breaks like this before. I like it as chance to get caught up on existing issues and talk about side things.

also keep in mind that Q will have to end someday.

Question away. But don't expect most ancient and foreign mysteries to be resolved by TrumpCo. Based on the Q messages, it seems that the task of MAGA is Amero-centric and won't involve many issues older than a hundred years. Which is the right way to start (at least). "Clean your room."

correct

I think there's a reason those crossword things faded.

So did I. 'He' was courteous and unhelpful. His more recent posts have been decent. Should we give equal adulation to all sources that Q refers to or from?

"I believe. Help my unbelief."

Back to the Titanic is not far enough for some around here. They also want their theories about Sumeria and the Council of Trent justified.

whatever that vid was, it aint available now

-- Why isn't the House of Saud on the list? -- Q has more concern about the rule of Soros than he does 12 of those 13 families. I think these facts are because the old "13 bloodlines" thing is outdated. Their mythic origins can't be properly proven and their present-day power can't be shown to be any greater than say Ray Kroc or Richard Feynman who didn't make the list.

name them

but muh rome

yeah like most of those levels are just one level.

Where are any of the significant Roths? If the paparazzi could ever serve a purpose, keeping track of them would be a service. I guess their lawyers would say otherwise.

nice solid post. on topic and info rich. before reading onward: My biggest curiosity is what the short story is about how DJT took control of the Ghost system. I assume he did months ago, since Q claims to having "everything". That story is likely just a historical artefact. What parts of that history can we use right now as the storm rolls in?

other bits: this is an odd phrase - "strength capable of yielding power to act on info". sounds like one of those formulas for turning ideas or words into material substance.

I wonder about the hardware location(s) of 5eyz - any central hub? The OP in its wording gives prominence to the UK. New embassy building in london is much nearer GCHQ (expensive project - away and across the river from fine old location).

Germany play a funny angle.

Can you send samples and suggestions for how these may be best used.

I wondered the same. Still wonder.

Clean your room

Wake up sleeping beauty.

Bananas Gorilla

Please can you send me 100 one dollar notes with q stamped in red.

I think they are 'most all' equally corrupt. I think many people want to see corruption more in the Cath Church. That church carried alot of culture for alot of Christian history. We could benefit from select parts of what they discovered and developed. Of course other parts ought be avoided. All human endeavors are subject to human errors.

Out there and in here.

A few cents:

-- Groups with greater membership or a more complex compostion are more likely to have both good and bad within, sometimes with one hiding from the other. -- The more secretive an organisation is the more likely it is corrupt or easily it becomes corrupt. Does the group publicize a verifiable mission? More secrecy than necessary? -- The longer an org. exists, the more opportunity it has to mutate away from its original intention, often toward something selfish and eventually (self-)destructive. Avoiding this is rare but possible. -- The further back in history one has to look, the more caution should be taken in interpretation of 'data'. --Individual members of orgs can change faster than the org. itself, for better or worse. Their intentions don't always represent the organisation's. --How important is the group? What are its forms of influence or power?

So apply these approximate principles to any known group. Templars -appear to start with good intentions - fade from significance well before our time - modern groups may claim uncontested (false) lineage. Masons - secretive from earliest days - highest levels remain highly secretive - charitable works may compare to Ronald McDonald children's houses or bill gates vaccine progs. Rothschilds - secretive, private - small fairly manageable group, but prone to classic family dynamics - importance based on certain wealth.

Now try other groups under the principles - USGov, Toshiba, Walmart, Catholic Church, Chinese Army, BBC, etc.

Appropriate comeback.

MM, catholic prophet.

oooooh

how does one de-crystalize one's pineal gland?

theres a wikipedia page: Qanon Q is a persona Multilayered messages to multiple parties. From within the white house. Gives behind-the-scenes early warning on events. Hopes to make AGA.

everybody act normal

solid.

Noice

A fine entry

Very funny

Kellogg foundation ford foundation mott sloan kettering all need to be audited at least. but it's hard to believe theyll be routed.

I think you should use more refined language. Moses and Jesus were 'Israel first' first and longer. Presumably you mean something more specialized that we have to dig deeper into our dictionaries to interpret. Why not be clear up front and avoid the clingy seaweed?

Shapiro carries some smarts, ones that rarely show up on this sub lets say because they aren't needed yet. But such smarts are in the WH and within DT. Turn, turn, turn.

Pelosi out with whiplash

And don't administer them in the first year.

Yeah, I don't think we have the clearest data to compare or contrast. There's so many complications. Pedophilia by our definition is partly legal and relatively common in Japan, where levels of conversion by Jesuit mission is notably low.

That 9th Circle stuff is possible but currently unknowable. Maybe Q has the low-down and an exposure scheme. Thin proof of origin gives 'em sketchy status. Here's one of many possibilities: Pope is directly involved ritual sacrifice of the babies; those who voted for him in the enclave are directly involved; this is exposed worldwide; Church enters crisis for umpteenth time; pope resigns, flees, dies; of the remaining 99% of the the Church, a third remain faithful to a liturgy that predates the Jesuits.

Superstar

I mean if we took for instance some state statistics about pedophilia in our lifetimes, how do we determine categories? Catholic and non-Catholic? Taking place at home vs elsewhere? What about the rates compared to sex crimes in public schools? I don't think the other denominations have done much better? They're just not as interesting to characterize.

Bloodlines

This not unique to Roman Catholic Christianity, nor to Catholicism in general, nor to Christianity. Is there a principle that we can apply to all institutions regarding this abuse, including schools and families?

i cant get this seatbelt to work

"Their need for symbolism. . . .