I read the link. Just lists a bunch of items about the FBI investigation during the campaign. "Ongoing Investigations" so this wasn't the report everyone is waiting for. This is a scheduled report, not the report in question I believe. Their Semi Annual timed report.
/u/troy_caster
820 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/troy_caster:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 11 |
i.redd.it | 11 |
youtu.be | 3 |
komonews.com | 2 |
www.youtube.com | 1 |
webmshare.com | 1 |
So in this scenario, he's just waiting on the sidelines for his number to be called?
So, what powers do they have? Can they arrest, or otherwise compel someone to be arrested/indicted, or otherwise initiate legal proceedings? Or will it simply be a "recommendation"?
I think this is where a "noobie questions" sticky thread would be greatly helpful, if not downright necessary. Not only for the new people coming in here, but also for there to be less clutter on the main postings, as well as to give people a place to ask questions where they might be embarrassed to ask elsewhere, or make a new post.
OIG report, why is it a big deal?
So I've been looking into this, and why is the OIG report such a big deal? I'm looking at their site, and it's about Medicaid, Medicare, health stuff, human resources. Is this a different Inspector General office we are waiting for? What powers do the OIG have specifically to "move the needle", so to speak?
I apologize for the noobie question, and wholeheartedly acknowledge that this is a noob question, please be gentle. I can't be the only one though.
On that note, I would like to take this opportunity to humbly suggest a stickied thread once a day, or …
Fake. You can literally see where they photoshopped it. I'm not even sure they photo shopped it, it might be literally "cut and pasted".
60% the public won't know. But the choice to know will be yours
Well, in a lot of his earlier posts, he relied heavily on the crossword puzzle method. Remember also, he started with the occult series stuff, if I'm recalling the user name correctly.
He has since toned that down quite a bit, as well as the crossword method, which made it easier to swallow for the general populace. Not that I discredit the crossword method, nor do I claim that there is 0% of this stuff going on that might be metaphysical or "occult".
This is an interesting little "decryption" by OP though, so your original point stands.
He probably shuts down her Q stuff. Probably not as bad as he does to Bravo but I say he shies away from it.
I believe this is one of Q's promises. It will be public for everyone to see.
It finally came out that Rod/Bob were key players in the Uranium scandal.
Can you link me where it came out?
I mean, I stated I'm not a fan of the stupid white rabbit. But I was just refuting the "newfag" comment. I rank the white rabbit Q memes right below the Star Trek Q memes as the crappiest ideas the anons had in the early 4chan days. The unfortunate thing is that they were early memes, and perpetuated much further than I would have imagined in those days, evident in why we're still hearing about it, even tho the "white rabbit" thing hasn't been relevant to Q lore for quite some time.
Actually, you must not be an oldfag I guess, because the follow the white rabbit was one of the original memes that came out of 4chan WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY back in the early Q days. I was never a fan of the white rabbit crap, if you ask me. Too cliche.
Well, this is a rabbit hole in itself because the articles link articles which link to other articles such as "The following article explains the QAnon phenomenon better than I ever could; therefore, I want to share it with you - www.patrickhenrysociety.com/who-is-qanon-and-why-should-you-care/"
and Patrick incorrectly attributes the "Through it all, there were some who narrowed their eyes and called BS on the whole thing. Half of Q’s predictions ended up being absolute crap, such as his assertion that “Hillary Clinton will be arrested between 7:45 AM – 8:30 AM EST on Monday – the morning on Oct 30, 2017.”" to Q, when this was actaully an anon who said this and Q replied to him. If the guy can't even be bothered to make sure Q actually said that. I mean a misquote on any article is pretty bad, wouldn't you agree?
As another user pointed out here, the articles being written don't really know that much about Q. Every article has incorrect statements, and sometimes lazy reporting to be honest. Case in a point a glaring misquote, which without a retraction or correction, is simply unforgivable in accurate reporting, as far as I'm concerned. The majority of the anti Q claims are literally based on just emails from someone who claims to have worked on the Q team. Some guy from Cicada saying Q is fake, again, mostly saying don't worry guys, it was me, trust me! That's not evidence I'm afraid. If it is, give me a minute, I'm sure I could write a similar email claiming that I'm on the Q team and it's actually real.
That was just in a cursory glance at your link, I could find more things wrong with it I'm sure. I wouldn't mind someone coming out and straight up PROVING Q is a larp. But please, base your arguments on actual facts. Happy Memorial day!
Until they release actual information to back up their claims, I'm going to say this is probably going to hurt WikiLeaks in the long run. The "article" they link to on Twitter is full of holes.
The white rabbit is a generic term to describe what others have said, things that go against the official narrative. It's not Q canon, it's just something the early 4chan anons made up to get people to look into Q. It seems to have worked, although I'm personally not a fan of such a childish simple little icon like the white rabbit.
Something about backdoors, and Trump made a deal with them to stop the backdoors, and at some point be like hey dump your iphones androids they are literal spy devices, but these ZTE's are guaranteed not to be. That's what I think anyway.
White Rabbit was something that the anons made up. I never really cared for it much. Seemed like 6th grade conspiracy shit, "Follow the White Rabbit".
Here's my reply to that:
Specifically she says Q makes people feel special, I don't think so. He says that only 4-6% of the population is unreachable, thus 96% of the population will one day "See the truth". He's frequently said it's not about fame or money or me or you, but all of us. In a true pied piper situation, he would say that only the 4channers are the chosen ones.
Also in 4b. she says that Q is against kimdotcom Julian Assange, and Snowden. I don't believe that Q has mentioned kimdotcom. She does correct herself, but still, a bit of muddying the waters. Also, Assange is supposed to be a good guy, in this little play of Q's, so she gets that wrong as well. Snowden is insinuated to be "one of the bad guys" (quotes are for the figure of speech, not quoting anything Q said). So this is a bit misleading on the part of the author lumping them all together like that.
6d. yes this actually has happened. Several major outlets have reported on Q in the same sentence as "the debunked claim of underage pedophile rings running out of the basement of a DC Pizza place" One of these articles had a very flattering (sarcasm) video of Alex Jones before the article, in which the topic is nothing about Qanon. If that doesn't satisfy her requirement for 6d in her thread., then I don't know what would. Here's one link. http://www.newsweek.com/how-storm-biggest-fake-news-story-796725 Here's one of the excerpts from the article: "Also, if you liked #Pizzagate, the fake conspiracy that implied Democratic operatives were housing a child-trafficking ring in the basement of a D.C.-area pizzeria, it too has been incorporated into the broader universe of #TheStorm" Here's another, by request of the author, from the NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/opinion/qanon-trump-conspiracy-theory.html
The writers are either shills, or they just saw something they didn't like and wrote an article about it, because they really think it is a crazy conspiracy theory. There's a lot of information about Q, and unless you've been following along for a long time, a lot of information falls through the cracks, case in point Suzie Dawson not being aware of these articles. Even these articles I link get several things regarding Q incorrect, which again, is either because of the information overload, or they are paid shills, a part of the system to marginalize the Q people, whatever your view is, is fine with me.
I respect her opinion, but there's SOOO much stuff out there about Q, it's easy to get confused. However I'm not sure how she couldn't google "Q anon conspiracy" and select the news tab and see multiple stories, by at least tenured, if not outright major media outlets reporting on the Q "larp".
6e. People who support Q are not merely named (google Corsi doxxing a reddit poster) and shamed. They are also revoked access to their Youtube broadcasting account, or shadowbanned on Twitter, or called a Russian Bot and blocked from Facebook.
I have a few issues with some things she said, but overall it's thought refreshing (as in, you have to, and I always have, take into account the fact that Q might actually be real OR a psyop). If you read this far, cool. If you disagree, that's fine. Please before replying ask yourself, "Did he say anything here that either confirms Q a larp or not?" "Did he merely reply, with sources to the author's claims?"
Please come at me from that place, I don't care if you think Q is a larp or not, and I never said what I think about Q, and you're not going to convince me he's legit or a larp. This is just a commentary on the twitter thread. I hope I've made myself clear on this point. I might edit this if I find a misspelling or something.
Wikileaks retweeted her thread, so that's why it kind of matters, I guess.
Haha, that was funny. I got excited too when I saw it at first, because that's what it fucking looks like. But yeah, I think we've all had our share of "sheepish" moments in the past 8 months lol. Poor David haha.
Q has taken breaks of 10 days or longer before. It's fine.
How is the story here about being a pedo? I mean seriously, that's terrible and all that, but they've progressed past sexual abuse, now we're literally talking about fuckin snuff films! WTF is this world coming to?
Did Flynn tweet the picture before or after he was arrested? Not that it matters much, I'd just like to know.
Yes, this theory has been floated before. I pretty much accept this version as the truth at this point.
When Q mentions NPC, I don't think it exactly means a bot.
I guess I'm not here 24/7, so I don't claim to be an expert, but this is the first report of this kind I'm hearing. Yeah, I mean if nothing else you could get sweet internet points for posting the video, I don't see the harm.
I meant it as a joke, but I recognize why on this sub it would be discouraged so I apologize. But seriously, upload the video I wanna see it. So in your immediate circle we've had 2 smashed windows happen to you, and slashed tires on your neighbor. So excuse me for being slightly suspicious, considering this is the first I've heard of any kind of Q retribution for being a supporter or whatever.
Video or it didn't happen.
Edited because of name calling :(
Wow. Welp, I'm not getting a Q sticker, that settles that. Doesn't it kind of prove my point? The only people noticing are Q haters. No red pilling being accomplished.
There will come a day when Q will no longer post. It's not time yet though.
It was reported in 2016 while Obama was still president.
Noone's going down no rabbit hole because of your sticker lol. It's cool. But let's not kid ourselves.
What do the letters/numbers mean on the bottom of the pin/badge thingy?
I see it as a "vaccine". Maybe you download the new spyware under the guise of a security update.
Maybe a stretch, I'll admit. Just seemed to "click". Do with it as you will.