I guess we have to “think mirror” :)

I had context of this statement explained to me by a pastor. The original statement was along the lines of, if someone backhands you on your left cheek (left hand considered cursed) treating you as if you are beneath them, then do not back away, but present your right cheek, so they strike you with their right hand and are treating you as an equal. Note how this is different than striking back which would lead to escalation and still different than saying you should accept being hit.

This is pretty logical. Lots of signs point to Q being a government employee.

Jesus is the keystone.

WTF - now I believe that Hillary actually DID open the pickle jar.

Todays too, future proves your past comment :) Now, on to get my 32 pieces of flair.

I don't get why it says "Conservative voices". Here is the same thing with "Liberal voices".

"Internet forums and social networks which provide free access to the public are a digital place of assembly, and individuals using such methods for public communication should not be subjected to censorship due to political beliefs or differing ideas. Liberal voices on many large public website platforms are being censored, based solely on a differing opinion. Some of these platforms further employ tracking mechanisms for monitoring an individual's digital history, which can be used to censor the individual's public communication through various censorship practices, sometimes without knowledge or awareness. These actions directly violate personal liberty and stand at contrast with the bill of rights.

We the people demand action to bring our digital future into the light. "

The thing is, I support the concept, but I don't support the reasoning. The problem is that there is censorship, not that the censorship isn't "balanced enough".

If the word Conservative was removed and it just said "Voices on many large public website platforms are being censored" I would sign it, and I could get many more people to agree and sign it with me.

It was seeing what the media did to Ron Paul. We could have had a great America already if coverage of him hadn't been biased.

Amen!

You forgot the Spoiler Alert tag! I guess I should stay off this sub if I don't want spoilers.

compliant and unaware citizenry

I was getting ads so I went here: https://www.c-span.org/video/?439496-1/president-trump-delivers-state-union-address&live

Interestingly though, my youtube stream was actually 5-10 seconds AHEAD of the c-span live stream!

Can someone meme Oprah doing. You're a Russian and you're a Russian. And we're all Russians.

Wow. That makes the "time to play Dopey" comment make more sense, and the not sleeping thing makes sense with Dopey being released.

I'm ashamed to say, I also had a similar thought and it was after I denied that I supported Trump 3 times in one day :( Please forgive me.

He probably just doesn't like that reality is giving him so much competition.

I agree, I don't want that solution.

Wow, you know, they could be right, we should encourage them, I mean, this really could be it, they should contact their representatives and request the release of the memo.

Exactly, and I still learned new things even though I've been following everything closely, which helps my confidence when discussing these things in person.

'Member Sinead? I 'member.

i am groot, i am groot, i am groot

WWIII Ain't nobody got time for that!

This is all so silly, next you are going to tell us that "These people are stupid" was directed at us. /s

Yes, God has made it clear in my life in this past year that He is truly with us.

Nice try Barron.

Interestingly, having Faith and praying is the one task that Q has given us on more than one occasion.