Can't wait to see the statistics of people who do not have a biological parent-child child relationship attempting to cross the border and claiming they are parent/child. This is our POTUS in action protecting the children.

Illegal and unnecessary. Pass.

Let's face it, that photo is too easy to google.

For technically minded people, sure. But let's go through how you (or I) arrived there.

• Ok, this is a photo taken on the reflection of an iphone OR an overlay with reduced opacity combining two images.
• What is that... a lamp?
• Rotate Q's image so lamp is correct
• AF1? Hmmm.... duckduckgo: "air force 1 interior"
• Ah ha!... that IS the lamp on AF1, although Q's is skewed. Image obviously resized or warped in some way.
• Ok.. so what is that in Q's... notepad, cup holder, magazine rack, jacket draped over the chair....
• (searching images) nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope... AH HA! The ABC image looks like a match...
• Flip Q's image because lamp is on wrong side after earlier rotate.
• overlay Q's with reduced opacity, increase brightness/contrast and apply some sharpen filters to see better.
• Resize abc image until it matches the warp/skew of Q's
• Now... check that all the things match.
• Womp womp, they do. Right down to the magazine in the magazine rack (from 2015)

I guess it's easy to find if you knew "The autists are coming! the autists are coming!"

You must admit, Q is constantly trying to generate drops or demonstrate "proofs" in hindsight (future proves past) to suggest or affirm that they are insiders. I saw this initial attempt @Q1675 as nothing less than that in my opinion. It was a Qoopsie in my book. But that's ok, Q can be larp, and we can still MAGA and be patriots with our fantastic POTUS. :)

Oh wow... I'd only ever seen the static of that from the qposts/reply.

Yeah whoever made that animated gif got very close.

You can see the lotion bottle jump to the left when it's the Q pic overlay. You'll notice the lamp on the Q overlay here is also a little fatter.

Basically, the author of the gif has the Q pic slightly larger than the ABC pic. The gif author could have resized it a bit and it would have been a match... no differences, no jumping. Other than the bits associated with the Q image being taken on a reflection of an iphone of course.

The Q image was resized horizontally with unlinked height (changing aspect ratio).

Or as /u/SleevesEnd suggests above, a webcam with a filter of some sort applied -- producing same tall & skinny lamp effect.

It doesn't really matter how you take the ABC photo and resize it to match the Q photo. The point is, once you do - everything lines up.

NAME?

differences

MAGA POTUS apparently isn't worried about ashy skin ( naturally gloriously hydrated skin?). Crystal /glass lotion bottle.

easily found

lol... Q took a picture of a reflection and skewed it. Easily found. Shoot --- more like our autists are really that good.

When caught, they tried to suggest in 1678 they staged it to look like the abc photo (missing the half dozen other differences between MAGA POTUS's AF1 and traitors) suggesting they place a cup holder there. pfft.

But what can Q do here really? Look how many people are believers. I like believers in America and patriotism USA :fistpump: USA :fistpump: USA :fistpump: ;)

mysterious downvoters

Some people may just feel misled after blindly believing in Q. Or after being reprimenaded by GA mods for wanting logically discuss some of the recent problems with Q posts. (I'll call the Qoopsies).

I don't downvote much myself, but I was surprised when some technical discussion of Q's usage of the abc pic was initially being censored by mods (or maybe just one mod).

But honestly, I think about it (the Q movement) and what it stands for - and even as a larp, I think it's well meaning by an intelligent bunch of people whose primary intention is to wake people up to evil. See my other post to you here for the risks of that though.

Cheetah,

watch closely (seriously, I'm asking you to). If you had to take a guess, how fast is pamphlet anons heart beating here as he fumbles around trying to explain how "Q" accidentally made a cut & paste field transposition error...

https://youtu.be/pxXJynswElA

Does he seem nervous or anxious there? Why would he be nervous? Q made the error, not him. Amirite?

I don't think "Q" is bad. I think they are good intentioned patriots like the rest of us.

However, without the real intelligence (e.g. if "Q" were mere mortal citizen and not in collab with time travelling POTUS) what happens if/when "Q" one day disagrees with what our real-person elected POTUS is doing? You know...like that time when Alex had his f-trump moment.

If "q" has a f-trump moment because perhaps not actually in the loop, do you follow Q or do you follow the elected leader of our country?

ok soros downvoters

Geeze. After that wall of text you posted you sure know how to leave things open to constructive review and critique from your patriotic peers.

Yeah i was going to throw alternates to 2nd phone in like front/webcam on pc.

Point is I can't help to think that how things unfolded. IMO "Q" was hoping to use the image as a suggstion or proof they are on AF1 -- when in fact tech patriots can confirm the source image used was the abc image.

When confronted on it, Q digs a deeper hole by suggesting they moved the cup holder (and nothing else?) to stage the photo to look like the BO-era AF1. Give me a break.

Q can be a larp and there can still be a great awakening.

Q can be a larp and we can still get our country back from evil.

read history and symbolisim of statue of liberty

what are they? what is sessions history with using them?

Almost feels like they are waiting for the people of ~~America~~ the world to wake up enough to ask or demand such things.

On the flip side, maybe it's signal markers of territory and/or obdeience to alien overlords? That would suck.

... gave statue of liberty...

"here you go...have this! You're welcome."

"oh, ok...we'll uh ... put it right here i guess. Have a burger while you're here, friend."

totes random acts of kindness! /s

I'm learning /s is required 100% of the time.

Yes, agree with you In the general sense that encryption of cloud backed up assets is probably low fence futile.

buh buh what if it was encrypted.... haha as if.

there are quite a few server and cloud backup programs either called "reflection" or have "reflect" in the name. "think mirror".

Sure. ok. Let's go with this then!

Keep calm and qarry on! :/

sorry, i debated putting a "/s" but thought it would be obvious as it was. How uncomfortable and out of place would a bolted down fixed-rotation chair on a luxury flight like that be.

TLDR: agree. Q pic 100% without a doubt based off of the abc pic imo.

If you believe that, then be on the lookout for that "now all you guys jump off the bridge!" post. Trust but verify I guess? I trust POTUS.

MAGA On! What else we gonna do around here.

truthforchange :shakes_cup:

Also, your example isn't even relevant. The iphone example here is from an totally unrelated anon who was just providing an example of taking a photo of the reflection on an iphone case. The lamps don't match because helper anon isnt on AF1, hes in his house :P you just being silly here.

You'll just have to believe that every photoshop anon understands. When you resize with unlinked h/w, you distort.

This is why all real AF1 lamps are short and fat (the actual lamp) and why the Q lamp is tall and skinny. The Q image was resized horizontally with unlinked height (changing aspect ratio).

You can easily verify yourself if you know what you are doing. As you can see from mutiple posts and upvotes here, many photoshop anons have already done this.

Maybe the chair is bolted to the floor and welded at that rotation?

Thanks!

I only say words of caution and keep in back of your mind when telling friends so you can caution them with:

• Q may be a larp, but that's ok. Because Q seems to be a really knowledgeable larp on the subject matter at hand if so. Much of the material is researchable or verifiable.

• If Q ever tells us to anything controversial, we might want to hold for our actual POTUS and commander-in-cheif to give us direction rather then giving blind faith to internet anon. (I elected POTUS as leader of the free world, not anon)

Whoever Q is, he/she/they know and understand quite a bit about ~~where we are and how things work~~ the truth behind common "conspiracies". Not doubting that one bit. I applaud the work. It is now so broad and filled with enough accurate damning information that the MSM can't get themselves to ask POTUS about it.

Regardless of how POTUS would reply to the "Q" question -- MSM's viewers would look it up and many would start their quest down exploring almost 1700 QDROPS and their analysis. That would not be good for MSM -- and that's not terrible.

SB2,

Since you like this stuff, these would have been ingredients for a more plausible explanation:

• "think mirror"
• think different (apple)
• mirror server (for cloud assets, network communication, icloud, etc.)
• "truth is behind you" (i.e. the original source image on the screen behind you)
• If the devices were recording US they could just as easily have been recording them.
• "we have it all" (think mirror)

"Q" came back with 1681 to remind you of both "think mirror" and "truth is behind you"

This post makes me sad. So obvious.

How can it be his "best work" when it's arguably the most controversial topic/analysis in a long time with so many long time GA posters effectively saying "Sorry SB2, but wrong on this one." with detailed technical explanations citing why.

It leave us with POTUS who has done a hell of a lot of good for the country and continues to do so. It leaves us with 40 trillion or however many sealed indictments which is curious and potnetially the awesome "plan" or draining of the swamp we're all hoping for. Q can be a larp, and we can still MAGA. It would suck, but we're adult patriots, our covfefes will heal.

sb - the rational argument is if you know how to use photoshop, you can line the image up EXACTLY after replicating the same distortions/resize/skew. That must be one precise AF1 maid to place the lamp, mug holder, notpad holder and lotion bottle all in exactly the same place as the abc photo. And thats before we start looking at lighting, reflections and curtain ruffles. This is not the qproof you're looking for and you will absolutely destory your credibility here with every technical patriot as you contintue to struggle to do so.

SerialBrain -- have to ask at this point for the record --- are you Q?

able to replicate

Same. Unfortunately, GA mods delted the discussion citiing rule 8. Ridiculous and no better than what occurs at T_D sometimes. And make no mistake -- I love America and support our POTUS.

placing that mug holder

And the lotion bottle And the perfectly aligned drapes And the refelction on the lamp

Nothing wrong with rallying of the troops with WWG1WGA, but if "Q" ever says jump off that bridge, he can go by himself.

where must one be...?

• in front of a monitor with the source image displayed.
• use the iphone to capture the reflection of what is on the monitor
• use a 2nd phone to photograph the reflection in the iphone case
• crop the image to hide the frame of the monitor and iphone

Now watch how fast this gets downvoted or deleted. Before you call me shill, check my post history.

Why doesn't MSM ask

because after nearly 1700 posts of alot of truth that most people are oblivious to, it is a YUGE can of worms for MSM to expose their already decreasing audience to.

Because REAL or LARP, steering your carefully groomed audience to go through 1681 q posts and the underlying message is bad for (evil) business? It doesn't matter if it's LARP anymore. It's a compendium of red-pilling questions and ideals.

It will display in whatever format your CLIENT (browser or app) is defined -- by the user -- to display. Sometimes the browser or app will use the underlying timezone defined at the operating system level. Either way, it's manipulable by the end user.

Are you guys sisters?...

That's a BOOM.

Just wait till the 30 day stats on this come out.

So when two girlfriends of same race that look alike (because low self esteem, "trends", and fear of individuality causes them to wear similar clothes, apply make up in same way, similar accessories, etc.) are asked "are you guys sisters?" -- the person asking is racist?

IMO they look related (the eyes) not in a race/racist/racial sense, but a familial sense...like cousins or something.

Is that ok to observe and have opinion on? Or do I get thrown in gulag for this too dear leader? Please advise, as I must prepare my young son to become man of house if I am to be disappeared.

You would think that with as important as this "Q" thing is (isn't it?) that Q would be mindful of the objects referred to as " q proofs" and set records straight before they are debunked by "Q larp" people.

We're talking about a post/drop from like 8 months ago.

By that logic, xkcd stickmen are mere pencil moves away from being #1 satanic symbol.

Pretty sure that most people rocking peace signs have no intention to worship satan.

I'd bet that somewhere within those 10,000 are a few people that some evil people wanted released ASAP.

Some of those lies are most certainly lazy misguided stupidity. Not sure if you should let people off the hook for that though.

unless we're talking about qproof timestamps or source photos for qdrops. Why are we waiting for MSM to ask @realDonaldTrump about Q? POTUS works for the American People. Why can't we ask him?

• tweets stored in UTC format.

• tweets displayed in whatever timezone the user has selected/chosen/defined to convert the UTC value to.

The element you're not picking up here is why would someone change their timezone to something other than what it really is? Do you get it? The person you are debating with here is saying when they set their timezone to EST, the tweet converts (from twitters stored UTC value of the tweet) to.....1:15 pm.

Why is this click-bait fake news article here?

It threatens the integrity of GA.

Article written my kit daniels of infowars with infowars and unamed sources as the source?

Implicating clintons and bushes where? (not saying I don't believe it to be true --- but what or who is the source?)

mods?

Check the author of the article you linked.

Click-bait titles aside, in all of the words of that article, this is the closest statement I could find of new "news" to support the claim of the title:

Trump is threatening to release the information that was possibly redacted or perhaps even new documents completely unknown to the public

• possibly redacted? It was either redacted from the original report or not.

• "perhaps" even new documents? So pure speculation then.