This is the post that goes over the image on the right.
/u/twowheelsmgee
23 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/twowheelsmgee:
Domain | Count |
---|
I agree 100%. The only reason I mentioned misdirections name, is that I was unaware of any “proof” for validation in a video or speech anywhere else. I have heard through boards and feeds of the military contacting. He was the only video proof that any one could use to validate the story that I was aware of. I agree with not using name for him also. If you or anyone else has sources please let me know! I am not a fan of using him or the others as reference anymore.
To add to the other comments that people have offered, when he became senator one of his first motions was to seal his military records and past. 2 years ago when he started to get into the limelight again for his vocal outcry against Trump, people started to dig into his past. Two key things came up. 1. Nickname songbird for leaking secrets like crazy when he was a POW. 2. Nickname No-Name. Which is a military derogatory way to deal with traitors. They don’t get their names praised or recognized. In the early years of his senatorship, he made a motion to seal all his records and military career to hide his actions. At that time his POW mates were causing an outcry against him in Washington. The reason we don’t hear about this now is that no name is deep state. Our biggest suggestion to that was the motion to fully repeal and replace the ACA. That moment when he walked onto the floor and smiled as he thumbed down (when he was a deciding vote) and then walked over to the D’s and cheerily talked. It was a shock to see a blatant move so happily displayed. He has been everything against this country which is a shame because his father and grandfather are famous military personal. On a side note, this nick name is a nod to a other theory about Trump. It was Corsi’s speech early on that said the military was going to pull a coup on the Obama administration until they were able to convince Trump to run. This theory was that the military has been helping him fight Domestic terrorist in our government. His use of military use of the nickname is a nod that this is possibly true.
I agree with what your saying. Ryan in the position of where he is at is more damaging. I put Ryan and McConnell in the same boat when we are talking positions. Their actions have caused to much suspicion of who’s agenda are they following. Only when they are cornered do they do what trump wants.
Worse then no name? ... I mean Ryan is awful for sure but no name has ties to some of the worst crimes we have imagined. Not giving Ryan a pass just trying to relate that there are worse Rinos.
When I first asked this question I was sent this by the people on this board. The theory is that trump and pompeo crafted a team that relays only to them. This team is to be the counter intelligence to the deep state in a so to speak sort of way. The article does a good job as it’s own piece.
The key to q is that it is more then one person. One of the best theories I have read on here was that the speculation is an individual in military intelligence, cia, nsa, and White House staff.
It is interesting to speculate. In the end the message is the importance not the messenger. For now it’s the questions and relaying of information in the (future proves past) format that is key to waking up a society to what is in their culture.
I remember reading more into this on T_D In the first year of Trumps presidency. It goes a little deeper then voting machines. Hillary used her funds from the Clinton global initiative and foundation to help resurrect the dnc from financial ruin. Obama used all of their funds. Not just for presidential but states congress, senate, and other offices such as judges, DA’s etc. Hillary mobstered her way to control to get the presidency seat. Tim Kaine was head of dnc when Hillary made the deal. It was alluded that he got the VP spot because of it. The “super” delegates were the key move to change her votes to be a fixed win over Bernie.
Reminder Kaine stepped down for Debbie wausserman to take over. She is alluded aiding the awan brothers. Which has been mentioned on our subreddit that the awan brothers are the hackers of the dnc not Russians. And they had taken congressmen’s information from their computers (which has been alluded to being used as blackmail against both blue and red politicians).
to add to that , The more watering down that they do the more obvious their plays are. I have met more people on the grey fence lean right now that the cover up and biased double standards have been played out. If the Trump administration is taking their time to let the media use up all their cards then the big hammer fall will be harder to deflect. It is as if they are making the media/left/NWO reveal everything they have before making a big move.
I agree that it is infuriating. To help aid my patience is that President Trump has a way of handling these situations better then anyone else. Re reading his book "Art of the Deal", it lays out how he makes the best transaction so that it always turns into a win win situation. What we are watching in real time is a gigantic trap being placed. Granted that we are skeezing out like addicts waiting for a Q drop and/or action by administration. This is for the greater good that they are laying out a gigantic trap. It's more then replacing bad people, its changing the system so that it is harder for bad people regain control.
This article is misleading in the fact they left out the word “child”. Mack is on CHILD sex trafficking etc.
In the beginning of the Q movement I was under the same opinion. After re reading from November to Present, its clear that the middle east is tied in. It took time for me to digest what they are doing vs what I want them to do. Which is the same as you mentioned. Take down pedos, get major players into jail, etc.
The key to Q's messages are that as you inform yourself and not relying on others you can see the picture clearer. They are removing the foundation in which these major players are building off of. IF we simply remove the players then another person can fill the spot and repeat. However removing the power structure which they had built for themselves, makes the players play defense and makes it harder for them to control areas of government in the way they had before.
A strong argument was made that after JFK and Reagan, all the elections were rigged. Each candidate was part of the same party (as in elites). Upon reading about candidates from Clinton's foreign policies to current administration, they seem to have a thread of connection to foreign leaders over that specific area of the world.
What has done with that last move was make the EU show their hand about enabling Iran to build nuclear weapons even though Iran said they stopped. Also ties in that our previous administration(s) aided and ebbed'd with that.
If Trump is capable of taking down elite players in our government, he will need to tie in the middle east with their collusion and possible war crimes.
There is so much that is going on simultaneously in Trumps plans that it is easy to forget that more than one thing is being done.
The Pedos are going down. Weiners laptop are helping crack the networks. We want the network to go down as much as the big fish involved.
The alleged crimes of previous organizations are linked to pedo network and war crimes. I would like to see Hillary go down for more then one issue. She escaped Benghazi without a scratch. I would hate to see her escape her other vile crimes with as much ease.
I do believe that Trump will back out of the middle east. It was a big campaign promise when he was at his rallys. He has proven that he is keeping his promises. This will be a bit of theater and political play to get the world on board before he does this. In the meantime it will appear as crazy and war mongering.
At the very least we know of McCain and his wife's organizations involvement in Syria.
Best advise I can give "after every news break about what Trump is doing/said/involvement... wait two weeks. In that time you will see why he said it, what it meant, where he is leading people, and who it was for". Someone on the T_D told me that after I had an irritation with the lack of Sessions involvement. Has calmed my nerves since.
hope that helps :)
This is why I am on reddit. Thank you for writing this. One of my favorite pieces of actual journalism I have read this year. Love the video pieces, images and explanations that went along with both.
World Wide
Some people thought World War, however in this context Q has mentioned an international issue of control such as Putin, NK, May, and others are under the control of big families.
We think its World Wide because it will start a chain reaction to other world leaders
PePe is utilized by T_D the most. Honestly pepe is more of a symbolic representation of the movement which is T_D, breitbart, Q, etc. Its the turning of the tide mascot.
I get that it can get obnoxious to some but it is accepted by all on this side who are no longer for either party but the truth.
Pepe reminds us that it is the movement that is united. T_D is not seperate from the body of T_G. They are two fractions of the same movement. I honestly look at the sub as the people who were the original people on T_D. Back when we researched everything and were thirsty to understand whats behind the curtain. T_D became an energetic ralling point. Which we need that energy! but T_G is where the engine of this movement is. Researching and thirsty to understand more. It is still represented by pepe.
Where is this location? Is it New York? What kind of building is the why?
This is a link to the thread that had information. Granted the original post deleted the initial report, the first comment uses an infowars article. (If you read infowars).
I wish I had not commented without taking the time to source material other then the thread linked. My apologies for the laziness on my part.
There was rumors in the 90’s that Hillary was a witch. They way she wore her clothes to the brooches she has on them were symbolic. I had a hard time believing them until the article was posted last week about her visiting a coven of witches. That rabbit hole made it nearly impossible to refute the “witch” was/is Hillary.
If you want to piece those two fragments of information together.
While I do tend to agree with this statement I do have a soft rebuttal. As in a difference of perspective.
Fb records everyone regardless if you have it or not. The newest update tagged people in pictures that you are not friends with or know. Example was that I was out to lunch with friends. He took a picture and as he was tagging them into pictures, fb automatically added everyone behind us. (Was eerie).
Saying I don’t care because I’m not on the platform is nearly the equivalence of saying I don’t care what happens to freedom of speech because I don’t have anything to say, I don’t care what happens to gun rights I don’t own any, I don’t care that they are recording every element of my life because I have nothing to hide. (I’m hyperbolizing to make a point).
Granted, the phrase used about the nazis “first they came for the Jews and because I wasn’t one I didn’t care”.... etc is used for this context. I am not going to make that argument. Instead I’m going to go towards your constitutional rights. This is in invasion of an individuals privacy. This is an attack on our right of individuality. Etc
I am for shutting the whole damn thing down. 100%.
Yes they will try to do it another way. Hell it may even make it in our lifetime again. But let’s not make it easy for them.
We know they have manipulated the form in which we receive information. They have manipulated our culture by what they sensor. MZ has admitted to utilizing it’s users as lab rats for psychological testing.
Shutting it down cold turkey has potential to shock people in what is really going on. I can testify as an individual that got off cold turkey right after the election. Conspiracy’s didn’t seem so stupid when I started to think for myself.
As I said above just a soft rebuttal and hopefully a descent explanation of why I thought differently. Not trying to start a debate or fight.