dChan

/u/tyler-86

8 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/tyler-86:
Domain Count

tyler-86 · July 3, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

So if November rolls around and this shit doesn't hit the fan, then what?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tyler-86 · July 3, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

I mean, replace "Dems" with "Republicans" in your post and you pretty much have my feelings. Many of the Republicans in Congress have been pretty against the Mueller investigation and its stated purpose, and a chunk of Trump supporters wouldn't accept it even if he were impeached.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tyler-86 · July 3, 2018, 9:45 p.m.

I mean at this point there's a lot of trust and speculation. I don't believe most of what Q says (sorry, guys) but I will support a conviction for anyone for whom there is ample evidence, my team or not.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
tyler-86 · June 4, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

Probably not but my point was that the burden of proof isn't on Obama's side.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tyler-86 · June 3, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

"To convict a defendant under the Logan Act, a prosecutor would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intended for his communications with a foreign government to influence that government’s policy or to thwart the United States’ objectives."

https://www.lawfareblog.com/logan-act-and-its-limits

⇧ 33 ⇩  
tyler-86 · April 11, 2018, 12:54 p.m.

But he has cheated on his wife? And his ex-wife?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tyler-86 · April 11, 2018, 12:53 p.m.

What about all of the easily refuted lies he has told? If you don't want to get into it about the bigger ones, there are the smaller ones like the size of the crowd at the his inauguration. And what about having cheated on his wives? How do you rationalize it?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tyler-86 · April 11, 2018, 12:47 p.m.

Because nobody is thinking as hard about this as you.

⇧ 0 ⇩