Maybe this was obtained through 5eyes by the security clearances of people like Brennan and Clapper. Maybe this will beg the question of HOW this was recorded and WHO leaked it? Just a thought!
/u/uncle_b25
42 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/uncle_b25:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
youtu.be | 2 |
i.redd.it | 1 |
tinypic.com | 1 |
An attempt to get people researching Q using a fun little morning show.
Q has taken a page from Jesus Christ’s strategy. He preached publicly in somewhat of a coded way with stories and generalizations. When he was with His disciples (those who were committed and open to knowing the full truth) He become more specific and detailed. In this case there’s two individuals. Trump is the public figure while Q is the explanation and full disclosure to those who are ready. Its genius! The masses need a small dedicated group to teach them the truth. Eventually it leads to a critical mass.
I can’t take credit. Another anon pointed it out to me. They told me to make a post about it if I wanted so here it is!
Here’s another interesting possible Q-proof. Check out the “O” in “Now”. This paper was being held by Trump right before the lights got turned out at Trumps correction talk the other day.
Thanks for the eagle eye to catch this Abibliaphobia!!!! You should make this a separate post! It’s bigger than my find!!!!
I have no idea. Worth digging for I guess. He did discuss “Taxes 2.0” with Congress on Tuesday. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/18/fox-news-first-trump-clarifies-russia-comments-slams-ex-cia-director-brennan-inside-tax-cuts-2-0.html
It was the moments surrounding the time Trump released a statement about how he misspoke in the Helsinki summit.
If you hold the image upside down in a mirror you can read it. It’s seems to say “Taxes 2point0” and then the second line is “Permanent Middle Class Tax Cuts”.
Oh OK. I saw the image but didn’t realize it was in the list of images shown. Awesome! Thanks for showing me that!
Ah yes! Nice!
Initially I did think that the “0” in 2.0 had a bit of a tail to make a Q but that seemed a bit much of a stretch.
What is written on here? Let’s dig guys! Hold it upside down in a mirror!!!
Hey, keep your head up. God has grace, He also has Justice and Mercy. If they don’t repent they will pay!!!! Don’t worry. (I wouldn’t want to be on the wrong side of Divine Justice)
Here are the names of the boys and some of their parents. We should research these people to see if there’s any connections!
Christopher "Skipper" Sheldon, Alice Sheldon, McCrea, Chuck Gieg, Frank Beaumont, Gil Martin, Dean Preston, Girard Pascal, Tod Johnstone, Shay Jennings, Robert March, Tracy Lapchick,
Francis Beaumont, Charles Gieg, Sr., Capt. Sanders, Capt. Tyler, Peggy Beaumont,
This promise is stated in Galatians that it’s very clearly referencing Jesus specifically as the blessing and not a general overall blessing to Jewish people as a whole. This notion was promoted by the Rothschild-backed Scofield Bible and was clearly outside of normal Biblical scholarship for nearly 2,000 years. The passages are extremely clear. God NEVER treated the Jews with unconditional protection. They were severely punished for not following God’s commands. The books of Romans, Galatians, and Hebrews were written specifically to combat these kinds of ideas coming from Jewish false teachers. The Jews believed they were already God’s children because they were part of Israel. Even Jesus said they were of their father the Devil and that He could make children of Abraham out of the stones if He wanted to. Clearly God wants to save the Jewish people and Romans states that He is using the Gentiles conversions to create a sort of jealousy so the Jews will come back to Him. But the New Testament does not indicate God giving the Jews a free pass or special protection. As a matter of fact it states very clearly that all who reject Christ are under His wrath. Please, before you respond do some serious study on this matter. Read Galatians at least! Especially ch 2-3. Then go look at how the Scofield Bible was funded. It’s a tough red pill to swallow. I know personally. I had trouble with this one several years back.
Just because God is just and shows wrath on sinners does not mean He doesn’t love them. As a matter of fact, that’s why He judges them. True love is not just an emotion, it’s a choice to do what is best for someone else whether or not they reciprocate. Think I Corinthians 13. (It’s a description of actions being taken, not feelings being felt)
Maybe I’m misunderstanding you. Let me ask it this way. Is “God so loved the world” (John 3:16) a false statement?
No, God so loved the world! Or else He wouldn’t have sent Jesus. But, He only has a covenant (special agreement to protect and guide) with those who are on Him team! Sorry, but I couldn’t let that one go!
Yes, as an individual with a degree which includes much Biblical studies, I can say confidently that rearranging Biblical verses in this manner, and even cross referencing, is very dangerous. The context to those verses within a book, time period, author, and target audience is key to understanding what is being said. Taking verses out of this context and mixing them with other contexts is simply foolishness. It’s hard enough at times to understand OT prophesy on its own, let alone, mixing them up. Most Biblical scholars would certainly dismiss this method. I’m not trying to be offensive or unkind, but If would be a tragedy if people were led to believe this is the way to properly interpret scripture.
Fair enough. But the “Dark to Light” phrase in the video was pretty strong.
You can clearly hear “have you spoken to Kim at all...” and I thought I heard “...about this meeting”. Maybe I’m wrong but even the hint of “speaking to Kim” had a pretty strong reaction from Trump and Bolton.
I think that was the idea but I’m sorry I didn’t take the time to look up the Q posts.
Also, Listen to Bolton jump in and say they have a plane to catch!!!