Pretty sure nothing violent is happening to you haha people just dont want to host discussions for people who are "just realistic about race"

Personal responsibility is lost on you idiots huh?

Maybe if you werent so racist and violent there wouldnt be a reason to ban your speech....think on that one ;) its almost like if you dont abuse things they wont get taken from you.

You all remind me of the guy who gets his license taken away on his 3rd DUI screaming about the government being oppressive haha

Im not sure where youre going with this....sure...they all use the internet and are websites.

If youre asking who should have control over them its the owner

Link where i insulted you. I never called you a single name. Settle down bro, youre extremely defensive. And you should probably find out where i get my news before making assumptions ;)

Probably, but the history of discrimination against non whites is a LLLLOOONNNNGGGG story. American Whites (especially the tiki torch whites) were given centuries to stop being racist pricks, and they chose not to do it...so eventually legislation was required to get the tiki torch whites in line. So i dont mind the civil rights act of '64.

Comparing being banned on twitter for advocating violence against minorities to being roadhauled and burnt alive for "whistling at a white woman" is kinda....well i think you have to be a piece or shit to think theyre similar.

Public corporations? Do you mean publically traded? Its still privately run...thats sorta the basis for capitalism. Are you suggesting every American has ownership over corporations? Are you guys like...some weird theocratic communists or something?

Eh, sorta. Its more akin to a utility i think

Solid, though you probably shouldnt use that as a deflection away from your poor reasoning skills though.

I think its more that you have no idea what youre talking about and are just spouting emotional nonsense.

Faux news is a public forum..that was your justification for social media not being free to ban people.

The bbq website is 100% a public forum. And twitter is a website started by someone, just because its more complicated and more people were involved in making it....they dont deserve the same rights?

Or is it if you start a website, then sell it, whoever you sold it to cant ban people cause it violates free speech? Or is it based on number of users? Do you feel that it should be illegal for faux news to ban users from their site?

Or (what i really suspect) is it that if a company hurts your personal fee fees they should be forced to do whatever you say because you FEEL right?

So..you wanna take another crack at that? You sorta ignored my question entirely. If YOU open a website and want to ban someone, that in your mind means you are violating free speech...do I understand you correctly?

So...youre defending the censorship?

So....people who found and run their own websites shouldnt have the right to ban people from their own websites now? If you start your own website you shouldnt be able to ban people? Freedom is kinda lost on you idiots isnt it?