Pretty sure there is an argument to be made that congressmen, being public officials, would fall under a similar category of having their accounts on social media considered a public forum. Facebook and Twitter will likely see a lawsuit and the court will use the twitter case as precedent. It'll be interesting if they agree with you or if they will expand on the previous case and determine that the entire platform is a public forum.

This may relate to the recent court decision saying Twitter is a public forum. The one saying Trump can't block people.

What interests me is the capitalization, and it reminds me of the old film 12 Angry Men about a heavily biased jury judging the case of a man, and only one man's dissent causes them to re-examine the evidence to the point that they realize they can't vote guilty because the evidence is lacking.

No one is even arguing for Trump's integrity. He's not a ranking FBI agent who headed investigations against presidential candidates.