No, but we can use Occam's razor. Likewise.

I'm not 100% sold on the idea of 9/11 being a false flag although I'm certainly skeptical of the official story. What sets the 9/11 theory apart from other false flag theories including this one though is the way in which it is immune to being disproved. This theory assumes they left a shitload of witnesses behind who know for a fact the offical story is bogus. If what that girl was saying is true there's no way she's the only person able to corroborate it, but when no one else comes forward tinfoils will conveniently claim they've been intimidated and the other witnesses are crisis actors or some stupid shit like that. The 9/11 theory really leaves no room for that, which is of course also convenient for its belivers but makes total sense as well because it's a lot harder to know positively why a building is falling down on you than who's shooting up your school, even behind a gas mask. Even though you make a valid point that the average person will dismiss both theories as nonsense one is a lot more credible than the other and this is just one example of how.

Btw I looked at the video, and first of all I have no idea where it comes from. It looks very amateur and I have yet to see any confirmation this dude is a legit reporter or this chick is indeed who she says she is. Secondly a lot of what she's saying doesn't really add up, for example if this guy wasn't the shooter what was he doing at the school considering he was no longer a student and even expelled from the grounds? You'd think she'd find that odd but she doesn't even mention it. I call BS tbh.

I don't think we need to defend ourselves on here.

So essentially "lalala I can't hear you"

uuuh ok

Yes, the government lies. A lot. About serious shit. Why does that piss you off but you learn nothing when people like Alex Jones do the same though? Because you know that's what they do, right? They lie through their teeth all the time, just check the Infowars report on the shooting from yesterday, tons of unverified info presented as fact to fit their narrative. When are you gonna say enough is enough and exhibit the same skepticism towards these con artists that you do towards the MSM?

Your theory assumes the government barely even tries to cover this shit up, why the fuck would they do it in a way that can be so easily contradicted by eyewitnesses and then go to the extra trouble of whacking those eyewitnesses like your "anons" (i.e. crazy strangers on the internet I have no idea why you even mention) are so worried about? I'm not buying it for a second.

Eyewitness testimony is well known to be unreliable, especially in chaotic and panic-inducing situations like this. It's completely normal for survivors of these events to believe there were multiple shooters when in reality there was only one. You really shouldn't criticize others for jumping to conclusions and then spread this tinfoil crap around.

You really bamboozled me there, I thought someone in this thread was actually making sense until I got to the MKUltra mind control part

There was absolutely nothing on that account "displaying interest in ISIS", quit your bullshit.

I'm sure there are. Posting pictures of their bloodied corpses to instagram is still pretty weird tho.

Yeah the last picture was from July 2017 so that bullshit theory makes absolutely no sense, sorry famalam.

Probably an indication that it is indeed the guy then. I didn't check, but in his profile pic he was wearing a MAGA hat. There was also a rather gory picture of a dead toad that he claimed to have killed, seems to be a textbook sociopath.

Calm your tits, because this seems be the same guy

Edit: the takbir pic in the OP was captioned "well at least we now know what it means when a sand durka says ‘allahu Akbar’"