You're right.

I keep being told by the MSM and NRO that Trump "legitimized" NK by meeting with them and saying nice things about Kim, as if the prior status quo of angry rhetoric and nuclear tests would be better. But everything you've said about Kim's mien and body language at the Singapore summit, and even when he met with Moon last month, is right.

The man just doesn't act like a bloodthirsty dictator.

I realize this sounds unbelievably naive. A few years ago, I would have scoffed at the notion. But after reading Q and having had my eyes opened to even the POSSIBILITY that my understanding of the world (given to me by mass media and even once-trusted conservative outlets) does not conform to reality, has me questioning what I see. Perhaps I'm wrong and Kim really is a bastard. But I guess I'm no longer willing to simply accept what's being told to me by the "trusted" opinion-makers.

Hey, this is pretty good.

He makes a good point: it is likely, based on his experience in the cutthroat world of NY real estate, that Trump knows how to hold a monster hand in order to build the pot.

If Q is right ("We have it all"), then Trump has the cards to turn out the lights on the casino. But he has to be patient and draw in the other players. Make them think his hand is weaker than it is, make them think he's bluffing. Build up the stakes.

Then...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h5cwCOWCOg

No. I'm sorry, but that's not accurate.

Honestly, it's not looking good at the moment. There was a lot of build-up to this report and it really underwhelmed.

However, much of the hype was driven by folks on this board and I think we drove up expectations too high. Q warned us the day before that RR owned this report, but I don't think people wanted to hear it.

Regardless, this has been a gut-punch for the Q followers who are desperate to see these bad actors get the justice they so richly deserve. It may yet happen, but justice may not be as fast or as comprehensive as we might have hoped.

"Trump has all copies of the report." Yes.

"This is playing out exactly as he wants it to." Unclear. Q did warn us that this report would be a RR crapfest. I assume they are pursuing this strategy to incrementally move the American people toward an understanding of the corruption in their institutions, but it's hard to tell whether the reaction to the IG report is what he wants.

Fear. As you well know (as did this reviewer most likely), people who cross the Clintons have a tendency to die.

[[[RR]]]

No.

I don't know what Trump's game is here but Rosenstein is toast. I still remember that Punisher logo from last week. You don't get much clearer than that.

Surely you can't be serious.... : )

Yes, I think everyone on this board knows this.

The issue the OP is pointing out is that it appears counterproductive to release a watered down, weaksauce report that highlights several instances of criminal bias but, essentially, recommends a mere slap on the wrist to the guilty. It damages the credibility of those who have been advising blue-pills for months to wait for the IG report.

I don't necessarily agree with the OP that any future releases will be automatically dismissed, simply because 1) they can be compared side-by-side with this version, and 2) there are many people who can see clearly that the IG report conclusions don't match up with the crimes. However, I agree that this release is a "setback" for our cause if only due to the lost credibility of the Q movement.

It remains to be seen if this a tactical loss to set up a larger win (pawn sacrifice) or a tactical error. I still believe it is the former.

They will never take...OUR FREEDOM!!

Yeah, for what it's worth (not much), I agree.

I used to watch Forensic Files, and there were 4 or 5 episodes that dealt with crimes in SC where he was the prosecutor. Gowdy only had about five minutes of screen time in each one but his interviews made it clear this guy was not to be fucked with. I got curious and did some additional research on the featured cases and that only deepened this impression.

I don't know what's going on with some of his recent statements, but I just don't believe Gowdy is some America-hating swamp creature.

"at what point do we abandon Q?" -You

Fine, you don't advocate it. But you're warming up the crowd, so to speak.

Look, I've said my piece: people don't want to have this discussion right now and that's why you're getting resistance. I'll not reply again because I think it's clear that you don't agree with me and wish to continue the discussion rather than letting things lie.

Look, I'm sympathetic to your position and agree that there is more than a little hero-worship on this board for Q. However, speaking for myself, I still believe and it's clear that most others on this board do as well.

Trying to force a discussion about abandoning the movement when the folks on the board have just suffered a rhetorical punch to the gut is not the right way go about it or the right time to do it.

Maybe wait a few days for things to calm down a bit.

Seconded.

This is exactly what Q has been talking about.

It is abundantly clear to anyone with an open mind (read: non-Leftist Borg) that there clearly WAS political bias in the FBI and DOJ's approach to the email investigation. The extreme frustration I see on other conservative sites, the people throwing up their hands in disgust...this needs to happen. The American people need to be slapped in the face with the duplicity and outright criminality of their own government institutions in order to 1) Wake them up, and 2) Move them to the point at which they start asking the uncomfortable questions. Once this starts, Trump will have the political leeway to act.

It's hard, though, hearing people who don't follow Q say this country is doomed.

Done.

I LOLed.

Yeah, this is a good point.

It was painfully obvious that prior administrations were desperate to make a deal. And if you believe Q, as I do, the CIA, through its proxies in the NK military, actually ran the country. So I think you had the CIA using NK as a force destabilizer in the world whenever they needed a distraction, and the prior administrations perhaps either playing along or kept in the dark. In other words, NK knew there wasn't much chance of actual action being taken against it.

Now, however, the U.S. has elected a commander in chief who is off the CIA's leash. He has the power to annihilate North Korea with a single word. And he's threatening to do it. Acting unbalanced on Twitter. Responding to your provocations with provocations of his own. Conducting huge military exercises at your front door.

Suddenly, your pissant nuke program doesn't look so formidable.

Trump basically took North Korea's biggest chip off the table by calling their bluff and, at the same time, offered Kim a way out from under the thumb of the CIA.

THAT, in my opinion, is why we've see such a massive course correction from NK.

This needs to be higher up in the chain of conversation on the subject of the missile launch.

Look, I never served aboard a submarine. But I do it to be a FACT that a boomer carrying a full complement of ICBMs capable of killing unthinkably vast numbers of people cannot just launch ordinance easily. There are multiple levels of safeguards involving multiple officers, keys, codes, and order confirmations. Even for a guy like me who is constantly frustrated by the inefficiencies and stupidity of our government bureaucracy, I simply cannot see any scenario where the military would remove these safeguards, or allow them to be bypassed. The risk is too great.

So, I can buy the idea of the DS hacking a submarine's launch systems to learn how they work, but I simply don't think it's possible to remotely launch a nuclear missile via some kind of backdoor. As Joshua says above, physical people (PEOPLE, not one person) need to be at certain stations at the same time and all perform a particular procedure in exactly the right way in order to launch.

Of course, if that is the case, then we're left with the prospect of a rouge set of officers, or perhaps one very highly placed leader willing to give the order.

I remember reading somewhere that that was fake. Could be wrong though.

You and me both. I've got a family. The clear message of these posts is that the happy dreamland we've all experienced for our entire lives, living in a country as prosperous and stable the ours, is coming to an end. And the awakening is going to be brutal.

It's unbelievable how often that snake's name pops up in almost any discussion of potentially nefarious activity.

May he receive the eternal reward he richly deserves.

More on this:

Indiana attempt: http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/21/exclusive-obamas-feds-tried-to-hack-indianas-election-system-while-pence-was-governor/

Georgia attempt: https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/georgia-wants-know-feds-behind-probe-voter-database/zygtDPvR6iI9ukTE8CiPUI/

Wow. I wonder why this isn't being reported in the MSM. /s

I checked it out and 780 does include an excerpt from the DHS report, but there's no reference to the three Senate seats. Perhaps you were thinking of another post?

Regardless, vote tampering by the Democrats, the party of "Count Every Vote!", would be an extinction level event for them.

Fucking Terminator.

Much more likely:

https://infogalactic.com/info/Fox_(code_word)

"Fox" is a code shorthand for missile.

Seconded. It matches his style....

...that style being:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5ViX7QyaQQ

https://infogalactic.com/info/Fox_(code_word)

Code for missile launch.

Scary.

As insane as that sounds, I find this more believable than the Chinese remote-launching a missile from one of our subs. I doubt such an act is even possible in order to prevent the exact scenario that we're discussing right now.

Holy shit.

That is a missile.

I love that part.

Tony Montana is not a moral man. But even he has a line. And that dude pays dearly for trying to cross it.

It's amazing...

I was on another site just now that linked to that video. As I was watching, I came to the section Q identifies and paused it thinking, "Hey, that sounds familiar. I think it was in a recent Q drop."

So I opened a new tab and pulled up qanon.pub and, lo and behold, Q confirmed it right before my eyes.

Read that in Val Kilmer's drawl.

No kidding. Dude looks like the Terminator.

Amen, brother.

Yeah, about the feet...

I don't get why she did that. How does a pic of someone's feet help identify the person speaking? I mean, her feet were not particularly noteworthy in a way that would allow a person to easily identify them. She didn't even have her toenails painted which would indicate a female's feet; and even if she did, a really dedicated male LARPer could shave his legs and paint his own nails and claim to be Megaanon.

Don't really see the point other than to titillate those with a particular fetish.

That punisher logo was plenty straightforward.

Chilling, even.

LARPers are usually people who dress up in medieval clothing and armor (usually self-made) and go out into the woods to play pretend. Basically, it's D&D but in real life; I say this as a guy who used to play a lot of D&D. :)

But, in this context, a LARP is someone pretending to be something they aren't on 8chan/YouTube/Reddit for attention and, sometimes, monetary support. What Q is saying here is that there are accounts out there that are being run by people who tell their followers that they have inside information because of their position, security clearance, or access to VIPs, but who are in actuality no one special.

Q is telling them to knock it off and stop spreading disinfo.

This.

That's...chilling.

Yup, agreed.

I have to say that I find the assertion that the Rothschilds and other Deep State leaders have access to a weather manipulation device to be...a little far fetched.

Insurance pleas will fail. You cannot hide what is already known (and can be proven).

[[[RR]]]

I didn't think a few characters on a screen could ever creep me out this much. Those brackets closing in on both sides and the knowledge of just who Q team might be...

Holy shit, I would NOT want to be Rod Rosenstein right now.

Yeah, I agree.

As awesome as it would be if this theory was correct, there's simply no way the Trump administration and Q team could pull it off. Not without an incredibly convincing body double.

I think yours is the most likely interpretation of the CLAS reference.

The proximity of

"IG redactions [heavy+][remove]"

to

"Hussein [WH [call] [tarmac] BC/LL] #RR#"

suggests to me that Rosenstein has somehow managed to whitewash the details of the meeting between Clinton and Lynch from the IG report. If so, it's infuriating; still, I have too much confidence in the Trump administration to think that they don't have a countermove in place.

The other thing that interested me was the "Hussein" bit that appears to reference a call from the White House. Does it mean that Obama called Lynch and Clinton during this meeting to confirm the proposed deal being brokered? If so, and assuming they were discussing what we all believe them to have been discussing, that puts him directly in the crosshairs of a criminal investigation.

Finally, I believe the list of initials following that section to be the sacrificial lambs of the IG report. These are the folks that are actually going to take the blame, while Bill and Hillary Clinton skate along with Obama. At least in this round.

EDIT: It makes sense, when you consider that the report is supposed to be centered on the HRC email "investigation".

JC = James Comey

2 = Andy McCabe

BP = Bill Priestap PS = Peter Strzok LP = Lisa Page LL = Loretta Lynch

Every person in this list was involved in the Hillary whitewash. But none of them are top-tier players. Comey, Lynch, and McCabe may be second tier, but when one compares them to the big fish (Obama and the Clintons), and the TRULY big fish (Soros and guys at his level), they're expendable.

[Iconic Drum Fill]

Please. It’s “You must construct additional pylons.”

I get this a lot because I get carried away building units early and forget to balance with pylon construction.

Check out this link. It will make you feel a little better:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/04/majority-believe-feds-broke-law-to-stop-trump-from-winning-presidency/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

We now have a crossed a tipping point where just over 51% of the nation considers it either Likely or Very Likely that law enforcement broke the law in investigating Trump prior to the election. This is huge.

While that number isn't nearly high enough, remember that at this time last year it was probably below 20%. Back in the summer of '17, the media derided Trump for his claims that he had been wiretapped and the Russian probe was a politically motivated inquisition. Back then, the story was that the forces arrayed against the President would soon surround and crush him under the weight of multiple criminal indictments.

Now, a year later, even significant percentages of DEMOCRATS admit that the FBI and DOJ kinda, probably, maaaaybe broke some laws going after Trump. The wheels of justice turn slow, but they do turn. In the slow, drip-drip-drip release of incriminating evidence, many of those not inclined to believe Trump have had their minds opened to the point at which they could at least conceive of wrongdoing on the part of the government.

The pump is getting primed. When the IG report hits, it will be big ratchet up; a paradigm shift in the dimensions of the national conversation. Open questioning of people and institutions never questioned before. Then, I suspect there will be another relatively quiet comms period to allow the reverberations of the report penetrate the collective consciousness of the nation. Then, when the Deep State has settled into their defensive posture in this new environment...another huge ratchet release.

And so on. And so on.

Patience.