Anonymous ID: bb3660 Dec. 30, 2017, 7:46 a.m. No.14068547   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8588 >>8843 >>8854

>>14068334

> #burgerandfries had not one, but multiple password locked IRCs devoted to doxing people that they wrote off as being 'digging channels'

 

Digging will turn up private information which is useful in finding connections. "Journalist wrote glowing profile of Gamedev's game. Journalist did not disclose that Journalist and Gamedev live together." If they keep the private info behind closed doors and don't encourage anyone to abuse it, that is not doxing.

 

> JohnKelly, Xan, and a few others openly advocated swatting (or at least calling the cops on) acid man. If they did this to people on their own goddamned side, did they most likely do the same thing to antis?

 

It depends which side was their own side. Acid said Kelly had been an active anti since GG started. The revoltards all seemed to limit their attacks to only pro-GG people, although I wasn't in their comms to know what they did.

 

> Damion, SRSButts, Gooninblack, etc all claimed that GG used baph to swat people and claim innocent by plausible deniability, a claim I used to laugh off. Until stuff leaked that some of the IRCs were doing just that.

 

Reminder:

 

  1. All of them are known fabricators who have been caught making shit up time after time after time.

 

  1. The IRC leaks don't show what they say they do. See #1.

 

  1. If they have conclusive proof of anything, they have not published it.

 

Remember that Meowsticgoesnyaa dropped screenshots of Thidran and Bladee meeting with Teridax, srhbutts, and Izzy Galvez, and Thidran said he was being blackmailed by someone who could target his mother in jail. If Zoe's crew (which we now know includes the Attorneys General's Internet Safety Technical Task Force and the law firm running Robert Mueller's investigation) forced Thidran to allow doxers and swatters into the IRC backchannels, how is that the fault of GG? And if the rest of us were opposed to harassment and speaking out against it, how are their actions supposed to put blame on us?

Anonymous ID: bb3660 Dec. 30, 2017, 7:50 a.m. No.14068564   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8591

>>14068102

That's really a dishonest spin on what he is saying. "If you fix the ethics, then nothing the SJWs say will matter." You can agree or disagree with that, but that is far from saying "the SJWs did nothing wrong."