>Switch sold more in it's first year than the PS2 did
>Already achieving PS2 levels of shovelware chink garbage
It's like poetry
Yeah, the infographic doesn't even include that they do movies now. Or the fact that they've gotten so big they've got an official Call of Duty and Monster Hunter MMO now.
Wrong. Chink games are the worst offenders of pay-2-win and progression paywalling.
See >>14063599
As of 2014 Tencent owns Activision Blizzard, Riot games and Epic games. They now own even more than that.
>And I stand by my claim
You'll find far more western devs that don't do microtransactions or outright theft of art assets than chink companies.
Chinese actually outright steal assets and content of IPs they don't own. They're worse, far worse.
>Majority of their games are mobile shit P2W microtransactions that ripoff and steal from western vidya
>A lesser evil
>Implying shills have never samefagged on this board before
You simply stated that the Chinese is a favorable alternative to the western industry. I point out that there are far less microtransactions in western vidya than chink vidya and here you are trying to shift the goalposts. Your original argument had no mention or implication that it was talking about companies that could compete with Tencent. Nice try, but you're not shifting the goalposts here you fucking faggot.
Made no mentions of the games PS2 sold in it's first year. Just commenting on how it sold more than the PS2 it's first year and as a result the shovelware(That the PS2 got once it became known it was a big seller) is coming to Switch.
>Still trying to shift the goal posts. But now he's moving on to non-vidya companies.
Keep trying it, shill. Not gonna happen.
Worse than that, League lead to the now popular model of "Release a skeleton of a game for $60 and then release content for it over the following years(Often paid content or content that late adopters have to go through a heavy grind to obtain even a portion of)." Because fuck releasing a complete package, right?