>>14074671
I'm sorry, I'm pretty sure I made my arguments, let me go over them for you again since clearly you're too ass blasted to acknowledge them, in fact let me recap this whole conversation for you:
>Machines can program memorable music with rhythmic dissonance and euclidean rhythms mixed with a few simple statements about how melodies should be constructed.
>Music is math at the end of the day, even the dumbest drummer is dividing rhythms, and every instrument's very structure is based on even division and the golden ratio so even the most ignorant musician can have their performance broken down to math.
<muh lifeless muh soul muh buzzwords
>catchy melodies are as simple as even
divisions, harmonic dissonance, and cyclical melodies.
<durr you can't create an equation for memorable melodies
>You do realize that the scales on which modern music is built are, themselves, an equation for memorable music… right?
<LOL YOU POSTED TWICE!!!!
>implying that's the same argument again and again
>implying muh soul isn't the same argument again and again
Enjoy talking from a source of absolute ignorance and acting smug about it