Your arguments are shit, and so are you.
>Machines can program memorable music with rhythmic dissonance and euclidean rhythms mixed with a few simple statements about how melodies should be constructed.
The furthest we got to automatic machine composition was with Wolfram's musical cellular automata, and it required heavy user/developer input. Anything else is based on previous pieces invented by humans.
>Music is math at the end of the day even the dumbest drummer is dividing rhythms, and every instrument's very structure is based on even division and the golden ratio so even the most ignorant musician can have their performance broken down to math.
I would consider anyone using muh golden ratio as an argument for aesthetics to have their arguments automatically dismissed, but it's okay, I will entertain you.
>catchy melodies are as simple as even
divisions, harmonic dissonance, and cyclical melodies.
That's like Music 101, not Catchy Music 101. Except for the harmonic dissonance thing, as it appears it's been studied music that is "off" in one way or the other is often significantly catchier.
>You do realize that the scales on which modern music is built are, themselves, an equation for memorable music…
An equation for memorable music would allow us to ONLY make memorable music, and yet we still have people who know about music theory producing less than memorable music, which is exactly what this thread is about. In fucking fact, LISA's music is, for all intents and purposes, outsider art, and yet it manages to shit on most shitty generic epic music OST Hollywood or AAA games can shit out.