>>14097377

Based on what I've read, even he doesn't defend it. He says it was tasteless, and wants his fans to stop defending his actions.

That said, I don't really know who the fuck he is, and I've only heard his name in the past two days because of the stupid suicide video shit. I'm amazed that people still pay attention to these shitty YouTube celebrities. I understand if they make political commentary, or comedy videos, or even Let's Play. I don't get these fuckers who do glorified vlogs and get millions of followers for just talking to a camera.

>>14097591

It's pretty simple, and it comes down to the same reason liberals want women to have 100% freedom except women who might want to be in porn who apparently don't deserve those rights, and hentai should be illegal for victimizing people who don't exist.

They want "freedom" but only for themselves and things that they explicitly like. Anything that shows any flaws or weaknesses of their position (or even just simple realistic nuance, such as free sexuality actually having a dark side) should be banned, according to them.

It's clear doublethink and repression. It's really not that surprising that so many of them go the way of all those super-conservative politicians that got caught fucking other dudes and doing tons of drugs, and end up being literal predators and sex pests.

Pedos want lolicon banned because it's legal and bothers people, and gives their own sexuality a bad image. They want to simultaneously push for acceptance of their side while shutting down anything tangentially related that the general public is uncomfortable with.

SJW pedos also usually don't like lolicon because they don't actually like the shape of children sexually, they are pedos because they have predatory personalities and their entire bag is preying on the weak and bullying people into giving them what they want. There are many types of pedos, mostly being those who are actually attracted to children and would generally look at lolicon and try to bury their shame, and those who are predatory piles of shit who just like to go after the weak and naive. The latter type are the ones who are pushing for all this. The former can be fixed through therapy and medication (electroshock therapy is actually shown to be really effective if the pedo gets it done every year), the latter group is a cancer that can't be cured.

>>14097641

The "cultural colonialism" argument is honestly what blows my mind the most. These are the people who scream the most about cultural colonialism and who hate the idea of westernizing the rest of the world. They want everybody to keep their cultures and western culture to keep out.

Then, big surprise, a culture has an aspect that they don't agree with and they want it shut down. They want the culture to adopt their sensitivities and behave in a way that their culture does.

So everybody should have their own culture, and the west should not impose their culture on the rest of the world, unless it's culture that I personally don't like, in which case we should impose our culture on them.

People are fucking stupid.

>>14097704

>>14097715

But they always find a way to convince themselves they're in the right. If you point out their hypocrisy, they'll either say that Japan is already westernized and should therefor be culturally sensitive, or that their statements on cultural colonialism don't actually apply to things that are "objectively problematic", or that their own criticism doesn't apply to themselves because they're a minority of some sort.

You can't beat them at their own game, because their own game is strictly keeping themselves invincible from any actual logic or reality.

>>14097711

Yep. It's also related to cultural relativism, which is that cultural practices can not be understood from the perspective of another culture, which is what they're perfectly willing to push until their own beliefs are challenged, then everything goes out the window.

I'm already getting pissed. This is why I avoid these threads. Fucking hypocrites.

>>14097738

>>14097743

There is no way. They're immune to all logic, including their own. You can hold absolute proof that they are wrong in their face, in their own words, and they'll just go "nope, I'm still right".

I've done that shit to SJWs I know in real life, and the people outright deny the Muslim gay thing, either saying that it's overblown by the media and doesn't actually happen, or that "those people aren't TRUE Muslims", and that Islam is actually an accepting religion. ISIS aren't actually Muslims, because Islam is tolerant. Ignore the fact that the vast majority of Muslims support ISIS, it turns out that "true Muslims" are only 10% of Muslims. I say "but it really is most Muslims", and they either say it is not, or they say that it's still not fair to judge an entire religion based on the actions of the vast majority of it (and I'm not even particularly anti-Muslim as people, and I've known good Muslims, I'm just anti-Islam in general).

That's the kind of mental gymnastics. If you use reality against them, they will change reality until it fits what they believe, and refuse to accept anything else, or they will accept the most ass-backward interpretations of things so that they don't have to change their ideals (like believing that Islam is defined by only the most liberal 5% of the religion).

They aren't "abusing their white privilege", they are "bringing equality and tolerance" to other cultures. It's not "colonialism", because the other people can keep their culture, just without the problematic aspects. They also probably aren't "white", because they are part black, or part native, or they don't identify as white, or they are trans-something and white privilege doesn't apply to them. Or (and I've had this one thrown at me in real life as well) they don't count as far as white privilege goes, because they are "allies" that are fighting against the patriarchy, and the concept of "white privilege" only applies literally to people they disagree with.

The old saying is true, You cannot reason someone out of something he or she was not reasoned into". They didn't get into their position by logic, and you can't get them out by logic. The only thing that gets them out is being betrayed by their own people, or some other wake-up call that forces them to confront that their worldview doesn't work. They need to be hit a brick of reality, something that they can't just deny to make it go away, and there's nothing you can do to make this happen to them. It needs to be something that uproots their life and forces them to confront it.

>>14097832

> why do the majority of muslim countries carry the DEATH PENALTY for being gay

They say they aren't real Muslims. That's ISIS (or if not ISIS, just whatever country it is), not Islam. They should be stopped, but you can't compare that to Islam or use that to criticize Islam itself.

Don't get me wrong, I argue it anyway, but I go into most of these discussions knowing it's a lost cause and they'll never respond to logic.