>>16932709

>Can you honestly explain to me why do you people salivate all over this site?

I'll bite

>user interface

the site was actively being developed, was open source and had a github page, if it bothered you so much you should've helped fix it yourself

>filled with fun police threads (muh video games only webms, even mark wasn't so insufferable)

you're right, they should've banned those altogether to prevent faggots like you who think they're on /b/ and dump the same 200 unrelated webms

> 500 post meta designated Jim kvetching thead, but a corona thread is not allowed?

gee I wonder, maybe it's because nobody gives a shit about corona anymore, or perhaps because it has NOTHING to do with video games at all, and maybe just maybe an event that's fucking all imageboards inside out is worth containing in a single thread so not every fucking video game thread is derailed by it

>Rampant rulefaggotry against muh offtop but barely any threads about videogames?

way to out yourself, did you even ever browse the board ONCE? there was a fucking rule that said offtopic was ALLOWED but in moderation. honestly I think it's good faggots like you didn't like it because that means the rules were on point and kept cancerous mongoloids like yourself at bay, I'd tell you to go back to cuckchan but you're already here :^) anyway kill yourself

>>16932727

>Same as retarded meta threads that contained 90% of the posts on that board.

do you have a single fact to back that up?

the board was up for two weeks and it had 10+ pages of video games threads all with dozens and dozens of on topic replies because all the meta cancer was effectively contained in one thread, which was the whole point of it.

>Yes, every fucking five of them or so. As I said there's nothing I have against meta threads, but they're filled with circular masturbation of idiots reassuring themselves that obviously the evil boogeyman jim is out to get them and destroy every imageboard in existence because he's evil.

I don't see the problem, should've hidden it and ignored it, that was the point of it. all the meta in one thread, video game discussion saved, you don't like it, you hide it.

>And kvetch like little bitches because their tight, sensitive butts are hurt when someone would like to post a music webm in a proper thread.

ok retard, prove it happened, prove you got your shit deleted, prove you got your posts banned, I posted in webm threads too and saw none of that happen, you're making shit up now for the sake of it now.

> I can safely use several different imageboards instead of one,

that's the point of the webring, jackass. so you can use your dudebro everything goes /v/ with "cute traps in video games" threads and superior minds like mine can hang out at the cool kids /v/ instead.

>>16932729

>MUH POST COUNT

it's (2) now, are you happy you spastic?

/interracial/ to celebrate these new times