Anonymous ID: bd73d5 May 5, 2020, 1:43 a.m. No.16933841   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3858

>>16933837

Anon, the site has been bleeding users for years and this was just the straw that broke the camel's back.

/v/ was already only at 600 or so users before the shitshow started. It jumped up to 900 for a few days during the controversy and now it's falling back down.

Long gone are the days of 3000+ users and 1000+ PPH, since 2016 8/v/ was always going to die.

Anonymous ID: bd73d5 May 5, 2020, 1:47 a.m. No.16933842   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3845

>>16933805

Julay is super fucking autistic and bizarrely paranoid about GG for some reason. You can usually tell if somebody if a crossposter because they'll mention how it "ruined /v/" constantly despite it completely being dead for three years.

Anonymous ID: bd73d5 May 5, 2020, 6:36 a.m. No.16933903   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3913 >>3956

>>16933901

>The guidelines used in the dost case were a one off way to make a decision on which pictures of naked kids are pornographic and which ones aren't

Rulings are literally never "one off", anon. The US legal system works on precedent, when courts trial other people for similar things they look at past cases and try to follow the rulings there.