>>2991

Good to see you VQC! Thanks for the crumbs. Back to work. When we find x for a given c value, it unlocks all the remaining variables including n.

>>3016

>>3015

>>3012

Doing my best to follow you guys! What about the record PMA just showed at (1,1,6) where x=11 and a=61? It's a match for our (1,61,6) record. Thinking out loud here:

a[6]= 1*61 = na (from n=61 record up top)

d[6]= na + x = (n=61+11=x)

x[6]= 11 (same as original x record up top)