Thanks Topol! You are awesome. Your encouragement has always been appreciated.
>(That's right guys, I'm a math guy now)
Fuck yeah, Isee. I'm learning to program over here. (Limited success so far, but working!)
PMA hello! When we scale up in c and p, it looks like we have a prime (in a) and a multiple of 3 (in b). If we can figure out the a primes and tie them to a multiple of 3 pattern, that could work too.
Hello Isee! If we have x, we can solve the entire element. X is the key. X marks the spot.
If the offset can help us derive x, the problem is solved. We are on the right track, i think.
PMA, t is a derivative of x. We find x, we solve this! But t in (e,1) is BIGLY important because it's our reference for (1,c) and prime records.
X!!! Let's do this, faggots.
VQC's latest crumbs show that x[t] (and therefore the solution to all other vars) will be found in the (na)*1 and (na) for (e,1) vs (e,n). Prime and C records need a connection point.