Please hold while I bring additional clarity to the next render.

For the next render, I've included a very special set of invalid cells. The valid cells are green, while the invalid cells are red. Rendered in the (E,D,N) perspective. Here, we look down N between the A=1 and A=2. This view should be familiar, but as you can see, rendering these particular invalid cells leaks additional information about the shape of (E,D,N).

Now, we move below the grid. Turning towards +E, we see a familiar shape in the invalid cells. I'm naming these "leafs". We can see the boundary where A=1 shifts between valid and invalid, but this reveals this shape shares a common rule within the grid.

Now standing in -N space, we see a relationship once hidden by hiding all invalid cells. Between A, E, D, and N. Each leaf is comprised of leaflets, which share a complex relationship to the rest of the grid.

>>4885

The implication of this is, is there is a complex vector/series of jumps we can follow to find N.

>>4888

check'd. who else is home tonight?

>>4899

Just visual artifacts of using of a super high FOV.

>>4918

Changing the size of the X+N square means that the D+N square size must change as well.

>>4928

If VQC was going to give up the critical insight that makes this work, then what was the point of the last 3 months? Are there many solutions, or are there many ways to implement the same solution?

Furthering my advancements in grid research technology, I have discovered, or invented the hypergrid. It's past my bedtime…