>>4715

Thanks, looking up stuff spread over too many threads is a bit of a pain. Organization thread time?

>>4428

xFactor?

>>4429

Sorry for not replying earlier, busy week! I've been using some of the JS stuff you posted. Not my favorite language but I read and write it just fine. Only reason for using it in this case is if we want to distribute something with live demos to non-programmers, and glad to see the "single html page" thing wasn't rejected by you all.

Would love to cooperate on making it. And we're gonna need text explanations too in addition to the cool graphics for anyone else wanting in.

Have a bit of catching up to do on the latest progress so nothing to add at the moment

>>4429

>I'm just concerned about linking it back to my personal identity somehow.

>>4430

>How would your code identify you?

Consider reading these before posting. Your code style can be fingerprinted and statistically matched against previous stuff. They are just languages after all.

Identifying Authorship by Byte-Level N-Grams:

The Source Code Author Profile (SCAP) Method

https://utica.edu/academic/institutes/ecii/publications/articles/B41158D1-C829-0387-009D214D2170C321.pdf

Effective Identification of

Source Code Authors Using

Byte-Level Information

http://www.icsd.aegean.gr/lecturers/Stamatatos/papers/ICSE06.pdf

Who Wrote This Code?

Identifying the Authors of Program Binaries

http://ftp.cs.wisc.edu/paradyn/papers/Rosenblum11Authorship.pdf