>>4822 Not necessarily. If you were handed 'the button', does it mean the world would implode from newks? You would probably realize a new level of personal responsibility. We are moving into a new age, where through technology the power of each individual is amplified, this is just another example. With great power, comes great responsibility.

Interesting exchange last night on the general, thought I'd link here. Grabbed the pyramid images and posting here as well. Not as friendly as VA's rainbow pyramid!

>>>/qresearch/456115

>New N.Korean Missile Poses Fresh Threat

>>>/qresearch/456172

>Also today in NK.

>Notice the seats are green screen green.

>>>/qresearch/456301

>old VQC question: What happens when you use facial recognition on a crowd generated with CGI?

>>>/qresearch/456329

>VQC also said he would teach us to build a quantum computer, then didn't. He's a crank.

>>>/qresearch/456366

>Cranky, not likely a crank, imo. We're getting close to phase one if you haven't checked in for a while.

>>>/qresearch/456378

>Your opinion is worthless and you need to learn how to identify liars. End of conversation.

>>456427

>No worries anon. I've learned a good deal of mathematics and crypto regardless. Carry on.

>>4818

Yes quiet indeed. I've gone through and validated your calcs, but haven't made progress on the iteration steps. At first your diagrams with the large purple area didn't make sense, but I see completely from the 1,c record versus the prime record.

I think your though about the 5-wide with +/2 layers to capture those with a difference either direction makes excellent sense.

Frankly, of the free time available in life, have spent too much time following/digging (Parkland recently), am going to step back a bit, and also shift more attention to here. Not really learning anything about the world there, just more of an energy suck.

>>4824

anon, I See everyone point you made and agree on all. Well said.

If anyone want to read about some of the network tools, opsec, and other bits, this is well worth your time:

https:/ /pastebin.com/mXQxg8JG

Archive Offline.

Apart from the name, email, phone roster for NASA, one example we all would love:

[+] OIB - Operation Ice Bridge [+]

IceBridge, a six-year NASA mission, is the largest airborne survey of Earth's polar ice ever flown. It will yield an unprecedented three-dimensional view of Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets, ice shelves and sea ice. These flights will provide a yearly, multi-instrument look at the behavior of the rapidly changing features of the Greenland and Antarctic ice. Data collected during IceBridge will help scientists bridge the gap in polar observations between NASA's Ice, Cloud and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) – in orbit since 2003 – and ICESat-2, planned for late 2015. ICESat stopped collecting science data in 2009, making IceBridge critical for ensuring a continuous series of observations. IceBridge will use airborne instruments to map Arctic and Antarctic areas once a year. The first IceBridge flights were conducted in March/May 2009 over Greenland and in October/November 2009 over Antarctica. Other smaller airborne surveys around the world are also part of the IceBridge campaign.

>>4830

PMA, quick question about dropping decimals. I often check and see a whole number where it's actually got a decimal trailer.

Example from image: 131460/40=3286, where it's actually 3286.5. I understand the (f-2)%40=20 quickly shows the remainder, just wondering your thought process.

Are you using a Math.round() or some integer round down function?

Given so much of this solution hinges on integers, might it make sense to show when a number is whole, versus decimal, even if just one decimal place as an indicator?

My impression for using the div 40 jumps was simply to iterate more quickly. Perhaps once that doesn't work, we drop down to div 8, as we hone in. Not sure, need to go back, could be from the (8) triangles and (5) layers, providing the div 40.

>>4830

>it does find a solution for any odd (x+n)

Wait, that's pretty awesome right there!

>>4839 Thanks AA, good points. w/o twitter account, just need to make sure vqc is looped in.

>>4840 Looked back, and the "because f is divisible by 5" bit was basis for the 8*5=40 I think. Might be a clue there, something about using a factor tree for f.

>>4841 love reading your posts brah. Been me now.

btw - Q is on fire with drops right now. Open intel in 2010 got 20 cia in China 187'd. Going to be a whole new world without asymmetric encryption. More f2f comms and establishing of keys. Interesting comms from POTUS holding the handwritten note card.

Here are drops if anyone wants a quick look:

>>>/qresearch/466048

>>>/qresearch/465919

>>>/qresearch/465797

>>>/qresearch/465696

>>>/qresearch/466142

>>>/qresearch/466308

Two more, and can you believe the image and caption someone just posted!!?? (see pic)

Pyramid holds the answer you seek - coincidence?

>>4843

Wonder if that was Topol, he just posted this nice Organite pyramid:

>>>/qresearch/467229

last q-poast, and will keep this vqc related:

>>>/qresearch/466606

>>4845 Yes, an amazing timeline. "watching the world wake up from history". We've got front row seats lads, we'll be sitting with the grandkids some day, showing a pyramid, telling stories of this time. It is indeed GHWB in that pic.

>>4840 the p+++ through p— layout is a very nice view of this.

Noting the last digit sequences - very interesting.

(x+n) 8,9,0,1,2,3,4

n0 5,5,6,6,6,6,6

(x+n) 1,1,1,1,1,1

n0 5,5,5,6,6,6,6

pma - is your code java? Went to your last pastebin and downloaded, but haven't done anything yet.

This is awesome work!!! Feels so close now. Is there anything specific I can do to help tonight, versus trying to go back through and make sure all is understood?

>>4847 Would really appreciate that, your output has been great.

>>4848 Ha, I screencapped that anon's version of "Allegory of the Cave". It's a good one to ingest, in whatever form.

>>4852 ty. I think the private board makes good sense, if you can swing that. Would really prefer you keep control, VQC has other priorities in life than just this and needs to be more consistent. Q leaves for couple days and anons freak, we go for couple weeks here and hang in there, says something.

>>4854 Nice one VA! Not voting though, the space counting and voting on 40char lines is what broke my spell to stop reading generals tonight. There were a couple epic breads there, good energy, needed that.

Q mentioned POWER - makes me think GRID! yes.

Also, power, as in exponent -have been thinking with the factoring this could be important for keeping track. 2^4 is 16 divided by 2 (4) times, etc. Same with factoring by 3, start with 27 and factor 3 times, it's 3^3, so the exponent is the sum of the times that factoring was done.

This forms a polynomial, with the root numbers being each prime as a series, and the number of times that prime was used in the factoring being the associated exponent, from 0 to N.

I'm sure this is already well documented out there, will take a quick look.

>>4846

Heh, jumped the shark with the digit sequences, numbers themselves were same or linear sequence. Gotta slow down.

>>4860 Yes, but later stages.

ECC is phase 2, and we believe we're on part 3 of phase 1, factorization of c, product of 2 primes, which gets at RSA, PGP, and asymmetric encryption in general with public keys.

Still part of Phase 1 we need to show trivial solution for Fermat's Theorem, think involving Column e0.

Phase 3 involved mandelbrot set, perhaps other fractals. Topol has a great visualization, might be with the Julia set. Application mentioned relates to processing video / 3d geometry very efficiently.

That's what led me down the Geometric Algebra route (geometrical view of Clifford Algebra), which I still believe is at the core of this whole thing. Even Phase I, as the grid is 6 or 7 dimensional based on our variables.

GA handles higher dimensions easily. Learning GA is one of the motivations for me hanging in with this, it's something I've been interested in for a while.

When we're at that point, we'll be looking at various physics properties, think SpaceTime Calculus and such. This is where calculations for sonoluminescence come into play - 'acoustic black holes' and the like.

If this goes on long enough, we'll get into de Broglie Waves, Pilot Wave theory (David Bohm) etc.

My digging has shown that Geometric Algebra is the 'language' that ties it all together, links disparate areas of mathematics into one. Have tons collected on this subject, only just starting to digest it all.

I believe in the quantum nature of consciousness, with micro-tubules. GA would be able to model this as well. This is a life-long quest of inquiry if one wishes.

>>4858 I did think of you all at lunch, eating a fractal (romanesco) roasted cauliflower. Really, along with broccoli, though the cauliflower is just striking.

>>4866

Good, so long as intention isn't just 'vqc / we were right', but to satisfy an objective.

BTW, this is a LARP, and Q is a LARP. Have been thinking about this a lot - a larp requires a leader, someone who has a vision of 'the end', and the rest are along for a ride (still interactive and potentially influencing/altering the outcome). So when you sign up for a class in college, it's a larp, and you're given a syllabus, nothing wrong with that. Only problem is when the larp is disingenuous, a distraction, etc.

Christ Jesus, greatest larp of all time? "Follow me".

>>4867 ok PMA, back on track, love your focus! Read through and makes sense, will review more closely. Quick clarification - where does n0 fit in this? Is your n in (x+n) from the (1,c) record?

>>4869 ty, got it.

>>4891 No worries. Only meaning in sense we are students in this, learning for ourselves, by digesting knowledge drops.

>>4882 rendering a great success. Wow.

>>4879 Super. I get match using brute force squares spreadsheet. Comment on the decimals you mention.

Looking at c=14904371; I see the sqrt=x+n, with the …0831 out there. This is coming from the 8T(u) column, if you use the 1+8T(u) column in your calcs, with the 52171729 value, then it will be an integer result, 7223.

>>4892 ty

>>4879 Looking at the 6107 'proximate record' result. Noticed that the small square, 83, is prime (^2=6889). Could that have an impact?

Haven't replicated your spreadsheet. It's between your 6241 and 7225 1+8*T(u) values.

>>4897

For 6889-1=6888

6888/8=861 = T(u)

41 and 42 work out as integer base/ht with no remainder, and their sum is 83, the small square. The factorization for 861 = (3^1)x(7^1)x(41^1).

>>4886 These views really are amazing! You can really see the tree nature with the branching in the last render. We move along, get to a junction of interest, take the new vector…

What's with the macaroni's in distance, where green red meet especially prominent?

>>4900 ok. As always, these are really interesting.

>>4903

>Using our TuXN = 15 prime element: {3:6:16:9:7:37}

How do you calc this without knowing the prime element, but only the (1,c) element {3:62:16:15:1:259} ?

>>4908 yo!

>>4912

>n0*5 = 15 (Match!)

What is this a match to? What am I missing about the criteria?

Prof. John Conway

What were lectures like?

You'll find this interesting:

https:/ /math.dartmouth.edu/~doyle/docs/conway/conway/

Check link under "Romance of Numbers":

http:/ /mathvideo.dartmouth.edu:8080/ramgen/doyle/conway/RN92001.rm?start=&end=

You can download the lectures as .rm files.

>>4916

>It's a match for the small square (x+n) measurement. For this example, (x+n) = 15

Right, but we don't know that until having the solution. The initial x is 15. And (x+n)-129. Still don't understand what I'm missing with your approach?

>>4926

Feels like good progress PMA! Nice to get to know this 6107 number a bit better.

If I understand correctly, you're using the "rm 2d(n-1)" and "2d mod" as the check in the actual algorithm to know when to stop the iteration, having arrived at the desired result. You're only using the "x+n diff" column only as a validation against the known answer for (x+n).

Also nice to test with a bit larger c=c9874400051, though don't want to graph that one out.

>>4928 Intuitively, that makes sense. With very large c values, the other variables can may be quite large as well, so probably more useful later.

>>4918 Thanks VA.

>>4912 For your process, can you possibly just show one calculation, without knowing the final p solution, such as for the second step?

>n0*2 = 6 (no match)

>>4822 one other interesting view on this comes from game theory, a topic VQC loves, and he specifically mentioned John Nash.

The late John Nash put forward Equilibrium Theory as an extension to Adam Smith's views of selfish motivation. He saw Adam Smith's view of everyone in the group doing what's best for themselves as incomplete, because the best result would come from everyone in the group doing what's best for himself, and the group.

He developed an equilibrium concept for non-cooperative games that later came to be called the "Nash Equilibrium". He proved that in any game where a finite number of players each has a finite number of choices, there is at least one position from which no single player alone can improve his/her position by changing strategy.

Such a point is called a "Nash equilibrium". The proof is, in the words of the economist Samuel Bowles, that there is always "a situation in which everybody is doing the best they can, given what everybody else is doing".

I think that sums it up well for us on this board, and the work anons are doing with Q as well.

Here a fun clip from "A Beautiful Mind" on the topic - 4minutes. Some other parallels to our work as well:

https:/ /www.youtube.com/watch?v=2d_dtTZQyUM

Where we go one, we go all. No more secrets.

>>4931 See below. Also, he did mentioned there is more than one way to use the grid, once all is understood. I have a hard time being patient here at times. Wonder if the pace is VQC being busy and it being a low priority, or our pace of ingestion and readiness, not sure. The former seems odd considering how much time he vested in this and the implications of moving forward, but maybe just personal priorities.

>>4242

>Once the factorisation methods are complete, the short cuts via patterns in The Grid (e,n) will be clearer.

>>4489 Also, there is another function to come, plus part 3b for the even (x+n).

>Yes. I'll be doing a recap. Adding another function and then demonstrating on an unsolved RSA number after walking through the rest of RSA 100.

I don't think we have the additional function yet?

It's only been what, about 8 days since VQC was here. Sure feels longer, especially with twatter account down.

>>4681

"group"

>>4682

Integers are not a line continuum.

There are families based on geometry.

Spent the weekend with John Nash (ha, absorbing videos and reading).

Here's a short video that gets at the idea of a number being a "compound number" made of two groups. It's less than 8 minutes. The group part comes 4min in.

https:/ /www.youtube.com/watch?v=ea7lJkEhytA

>>4871 Planning to dig into what you put down shortly CA. But, you sparked me and that sent me off in a multi-day direction!! That 3rd row sequence, 4, 10, 20, 35, 56, …

I was out and did a search for that sequence and added Cicada for heck of it. Rabbit hole!!

Sequence is a diagonal of Pascal's triangle, which we saw a bit ago as well.