>>4196

>>4194

>>4193

>>4192

>>4191

Reporting for duty with nothing to report, lol!

>>4210

>>4208

Make one for me, Topol!

>High School VA

>>4344

>>4343

Thank You VQC for all the new hints, info, and code! We are all excited to be here working on this challenge. It's exciting when you stop by and drop knowledge bombs on us!

>>4366

Thanks 3D Anon! I'll get to work on stealing VQC's code for SQRTc. This is so FUN! Thank you everyone for sticking with this project for the long haul. I feel a profound sense of Gratitude and good energy leaving my body and mind right now towards you all. Thank you, Anons!

>>4498

Nice work Isee! Very clear graphics and ideas. I'm working to understand over here too. Thanks for walking through an actual grid example!

>>4515

Good AA! Just finished work. I'm a bit busy too for the next hour or so, but I'm excited to work here for a good while tonight.

>>4504

Thanks Anon, this grid link is WAY better than the one I was using. You can color, add notes, etc. Great for what we're currently working on.

>http:/ /gridmaths.com/grid.html

>>4541

>>4542

Hobo, (((they))) already know who I am, so not worried about planning a trip. I'm gonna live my life. You guys are my MathUniverseFam. I'd love to camp and meet you all someday in the future. The Great Awakening is bringing together people from all over the world, why not in 3D space?

>>4708

Hello Mysterious Anon! You also posted this:

>>4597

Right below VQC's post. VQC checking Anon status? Just seeing if we're paying attention maybe.

I think the diagram and >>4679 clearly show that the smaller square red portion is the area of x^2. Annotated diagram attached.

Hey Lads! I'm working, but nothing new yet to report. Got good working diagrams, but still lacking. I'll keep working.

>>4220

>f = 2d + 1 - e per VQC.

>Previously: e - 2d +1 in VQC#1

Previous version of f was negative. Now this one is positive? Which one is correct?

>>4780

Carzy thing is my (e,1) calculator works on the old (-) version but not the new.

>>4939

>>4940

Yours is the prettiest, Topol. It also gave me a clear way to explain a point! Thanks man. Check out the diagram PMA!

>>4949

#1 pic is incredible!! Like being in TRON.

>>4949

#2 like looking over the tops of skyscrapers in downtown NYC.

>>4949

#3 like Old school PC game Syndicate. Mission op overview.

>>4975

That is a mind bending crumb, PMA. Holy Shit. Try to wrap your mind around that one, lads.

Hello Lads! Finished the 1st draft of my new sheet trying to work out my theory about difference of squares. Here it is. It looks like there are multiple mountaintops and valleys, where different values of (x+n) approach c and then recede from it.

Unfortunately, it doesn't look like an easy way to predict when we're approaching the correct (x+n) value. It seems like there are patterns, like a sine wave. Not surprised. Anyhow, look it over and let me know if it sparks any new ideas! It's always worth chasing an idea to the end. Edison tried 10,000 times (?) before he hit on the right combo for the incandescent bulb. When asked how it felt to fail so many times, he replied "I haven't failed, I successfully discovered 10,000 ways that don't work."

xoxo fags.

>>5010

>>5011

>>5012

>The reason the iterative solutions are failing so far is because of the u % ((f-2)/40) result at the bottom. Finding something to quickly fill that gap is the problem.

>Have you given any thought to the relationship between the large square and the small square?

Maybe f is a measurement for both the small square and large square.

>Is there something in the large square that directs the use of f further into estimating 2d(n-1) or nn ???

Yup, gotta be a connection.

CA is very close to tying everything back to the number trees!!