VA !!Nf9AmQNR7I ID: 0aa822 March 6, 2018, 4:52 p.m. No.5092   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5078

Work is good, but slightly overrated. Nice to pop in here and afterwards and see Topol breaking news about VQC sightings and posting awesome memes. Where is that fag VQC? Did he really lose a wife and son? Wtf?

VA !!Nf9AmQNR7I ID: 0aa822 March 6, 2018, 5:02 p.m. No.5094   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5097

>>5093

Who dat be? Q is talking about The End? Sauce? Block chain and all encryption will suffer a loss of confidence when we solve this math challenge. VQC twatter has been down since last week, part of the purge. You missed a bunch of cool ideas and shitposting. Same thing you'd miss on any other board. Welcome back, Anon!

VA !!Nf9AmQNR7I ID: 0aa822 March 6, 2018, 6:53 p.m. No.5099   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5129

>>5098

3D Anon in the house! It's fun to start a new thread and see all your favs checking in. Red 5 standing by. I agree with your n0 idea of an initial guess. Let's have fun and get to work!

VA !!Nf9AmQNR7I ID: 0aa822 March 8, 2018, 11:28 a.m. No.5145   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5146

>>5142

Hello PMA! Your diagrams are great, and exactly what I was working on, increasing n0^2. Don't forget that f = 2d + 1 - e. Would that help remove the green squares? Or said in formula, e has already been removed in the formula for f…

((n0 * n0 - 1) + 2d(n0 - 1) + 2d +1 - e)

That would effectively take away the 3 green squares and make a match for the correct (x+n). Am I missing something here? Looks like you've successfully increased values of n0^2 and 2d(n-1) until finding a match.

 

Also, having n0^2 in the upper corner really helps observe the increase in n0^2.

VA !!Nf9AmQNR7I ID: 0aa822 March 9, 2018, 2:38 p.m. No.5158   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5159

>>5157

Hello Teach! Good to see you, and thanks for all the solid breakdown of ideas.

 

>>5153

Hello PMA! So my question is how do we know when we’re approaching the correct (x+n) when doing a real calc starting from c? Or if we’ve passed it by? Do you have a method yet to check each iteration?

VA !!Nf9AmQNR7I ID: 0aa822 April 4, 2018, 3:32 p.m. No.5430   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5432 >>5481

>>5413

Hello VQC! Good to see you. To your knowledge, are Q or POTUS aware of this mission? We're not gonna screw anything up are we? POTUS always talks about how the old ways of keeping secrets were better… Almost like he's waiting for a P=NP habbening.

VA !!Nf9AmQNR7I ID: 0aa822 April 11, 2018, 9:56 p.m. No.5527   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5525

I think the reduction in calcs will come from iterating the two triangles against each other. Solution can be found by iterating with the +1 and (x+n) remainder. Triangle numbers scale quickly because +1 on the base adds (new base) +1 to the other side.

 

There’s also anumber tree path, and a path in the grid.

 

We still haven’t discovered this beautiful underlying pattern. We will tho!