Topolanon +++ !!!ZjI4YmE4MzE5Yjlm ID: 7b70c2 April 29, 2018, 11:10 a.m. No.5696   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5695

A: Will money even be a thing when this is finished?

B: You already have the code. Y'all woulda used it already if that was your intent.

C: Pic Related

D: Having an income would be nice though.

E: Oooh! Or friends. I miss those.

Topolanon +++ !!!ZjI4YmE4MzE5Yjlm ID: 7b70c2 May 3, 2018, 2:03 p.m. No.5748   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5762

>>5747

So I did my visual arts thing and looked for patterns and my first wondering was:

 

"Does the Yellow complete the individual Blue and Green trangles?"

Answer: You get an extra unit. 1 leftover square.

 

Aight so… how many units short (of a perfect trangle) is the combination trangle?

Answer: 10 units.

 

So I axed:

"Wha happen if'n's ya lay it out in the other orientation? Vertical instead of Horizontal?"

 

Since the original trangle was 27 rows deep, I stuck with that.

 

Those missing 10?

Is a pretty capstone, is what i'm seeing.

 

I woooooonder if it'll work like that every time or if this was just happenstantial…

Topolanon +++ !!!ZjI4YmE4MzE5Yjlm ID: 7b70c2 May 5, 2018, 11 a.m. No.5765   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5764

^^^ This is what got me makin' trangle pictures.

 

>>5763

So… instead of "This statement is false."

It should be: "This (particular) 'statement' (which I am referring to as if you know the context) is false." ?

Topolanon +++ !!!ZjI4YmE4MzE5Yjlm ID: 7b70c2 May 6, 2018, 7:04 a.m. No.5784   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5785

>>5783

I was also seeing the pattern in your third image.

Like… the yellow parts around/between the green.

 

Around and between kinda sounds like P=NP…

Like it's recursive or something.

Topolanon +++ !!!ZjI4YmE4MzE5Yjlm ID: 7b70c2 May 7, 2018, 3:11 p.m. No.5803   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5804 >>5806

I started on column to cuz Derp so the first one steps out from 19

 

Right 1, down 1:

19, 30, 42, 55, 69, 84, 100, 117, 135

19+11+12+13+14+15+16+17+18

Increment+1

 

Right 1, Down 2

19, 33, 50, 70, 93, 119

19+14+17+20+23+26

Increment+3

 

Right 1, Down 3

19, 36, 58, 85, 117, 154

19+17+22+27+32+37

Increment+5

 

Right 1, Down 4

19, 39, 66, 100, 141

19+20+27+34+41

Increment+7

 

Then I I realized… I'm a derp!

And it turns out… these relationships are the same no matter where ya start buuut

Starting form the First Column… you can see what's happening more clearly.

 

Right 1

10, 19, 27, 34, 40, 45

10+9+8+7+6+5

Inc-1

 

Right 2, down 1… from the base… row*2=inc

10, 30, 50, 70, 90

10+20+20+20+20

Increment = Same (the "Plus Self" when you start in Column 2)

 

Right 1, Down 1

10, 21, 33, 46, 60, 75

10+11+12+13+14+15

Inc+1

 

Right 1, Down 2

10, 23, 39, 58, 80 ,105

10+13+16+19+22+25

Inc+3

 

Right 1, Down 3:

10, 25, 45, 70, 100

10+15+20+25+30

Inc+5

 

Right 1, Down 4

10, 27, 51, 82, 120

10+17+24+31+38

Inc+7

Topolanon +++ !!!ZjI4YmE4MzE5Yjlm ID: 7b70c2 May 7, 2018, 4:08 p.m. No.5806   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5803

Some Observations:

 

only the first and second rows seems to matter, oving in increments of 1's and 2's. LET'S TRY 3's!

 

Whatever number you're starting with can always be tracked back Up and Left.

 

Moving Up/Right or Down/Left makes things get weird. (For me, at least)

 

—————————————————

"right 3, down 2" is an increment of +3 after you find the base value of the increment ({Row# * 3}+2).

 

If you're starting with the first column,

Right 3, Down 2…

You base increment is ({Row# * 3}+2)

And then it increases in +3 per step

Example:

15*3=45, 45+2 = 47

Right 3, down 2 from 15:

62

now add +3 to the increment and that's your next step

62+50=112

+53

165

 

Also worked when I did it for 7, 21, and 23

Try it out fer yer own bedazzlement!

 

>>5805

Preeeeeetty :D