Long time lurker, not a math anon but have been following VQC general concepts, purpose and progress since Chris' initial posts.
I remember back in the beginning, there were many discussions about purpose, application & causes of concern once the solution would be discovered. Among several theories proposed by anons of what could be done with VQC, I believe Chris mentioned one application that always stuck in my mind: that one could use VQC to compare complex original data with altered versions, specifically pictures & video. That it could be used to prove/disprove whether a certain video was authentic. At that time, the hint/theory was that it could be used to prove/disprove authenticity of ISIS videos and other "suspect" videos. But now, months later, in the light of many Q drops since, we are told the HRC video drop will be coming soon (5:5 could also mean 5/5) which correlates now to Chris' reappearance and hints this week that
a) there's a reason he's come back now and
b) he/VQC anons have a few weeks to wrap this all up?
Future proves past. If this is what I think it is, and Chris was sent here by Q Team to share VQC formula with autists via the same socratic method Q is using to expose everything else to other anons, then a timely solve of VQC would be mission critical.
I have no idea if I'm right but this has been bugging me for days and I can't get it out of my head, feel strongly I am being "told" to post this. Haven't followed VQC posts much over the past month or so due to lots of personal business that needed my attn so if this has already been suggested/posted then my apologies.
Carry on VQC anons - your genius & persistence have been an inspiration to me for months. I pray you find your solution at the right time and I thank all of you for your dedication and hard work these last several months. You are all heroes in my book!