Anonymous ID: e0502c March 6, 2018, 11:31 p.m. No.5107   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5108 >>5109 >>5137

Hate to be a fag but was the “have succumbed to alcohol, can’t handle my son’s death, see you on the other side - vqc” /qresearch/ post shown to be false in any way?

 

I hope so, obviously, but I haven’t noted any VQC posts here since.

Anonymous ID: e0502c March 6, 2018, 11:39 p.m. No.5110   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5111 >>5137

>>5108

Lemme try to dig it up. I thought it was an expertly-crafted shill/troll sce it was around the time of the Revelations post from VQC.

 

Plus, it had no trip and was signed lowercase vqc. If VQC is around, he could clear this up quickly…….

Anonymous ID: e0502c March 6, 2018, 11:45 p.m. No.5112   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5109

When it happened I almost posted it here but, honestly, PMA was kicking so much ass and it seemed like such a predictable shill tactic that I didn’t out of shill propagation caution. However, now that a number of weeks have elapsed, I’m more concerned.

Anonymous ID: e0502c March 6, 2018, 11:53 p.m. No.5113   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5114 >>5115

>>5111

Two thoughts: (1) there was a guy on /qresearch/ that reported being threatened around the same time, (2) you may not have been the only DM or private comm.

 

I think I speak for us all, we definitely trust you.

Anonymous ID: e0502c March 7, 2018, 12:20 a.m. No.5120   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5358

>>>5114

>qresearch posts you posted!!!

>I remember the topo posts because back then I was insisting he be banned (sorry bro)

What the absolute fuck is going on?

 

VQC please post with trip and verify, even if it is the worst, we can handle it.

Anonymous ID: e0502c March 7, 2018, 12:23 a.m. No.5121   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5122

>>5115

Hey, I really, really, really hope so. I hope this is fake with every fiber of my being. Hopefully we’ll all laugh about this in the future.

Anonymous ID: e0502c March 7, 2018, 12:39 a.m. No.5124   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5123

I absolutely hate saying this: could also be an AI bot trained on /vqc/ as well as /qresearch/ or /cbts/. A muddy-the-waters type of thing.

Anonymous ID: e0502c March 19, 2018, 2:30 a.m. No.5231   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5233 >>5235 >>5362

>>5225

>>5224

 

What if the integers themselves are a type of tagged pointer? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tagged_pointer

 

On 64 bit architectures, pointers to word-aligned objects have the lower 3 bits clear. What if an implementation detail of our universe is integers are tagged pointers that can be partially decoded to 3 bit detail before being dereferenced?

 

Jesus Christ some of the ideas spawned from these threads are truly heretical…

Anonymous ID: e0502c March 21, 2018, 12:01 a.m. No.5242   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5248 >>5251

>>5241

Stated another way: you are making (f-2)/40 jumps but why that small? For what specific, articulatable reason? Why are we doing 5 * 8 rather than 6543277645 * 8 to really speed things up?

 

Note that at the end of the day I have no fucking clue what I’m talking about, I’m just trying to help by pointing out what I don’t understand about your generally excellent posts and program output.

Anonymous ID: e0502c March 23, 2018, 12:55 a.m. No.5264   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5271

>>5260

This is fucking awesome.

 

A couple stupid questions from your pastebin output: what happens if you keep going past the solution? Does x+n diff become negative? Just looking for stably-sorted things to binary search. If x+n diff did become negative and we could jump around, it would be an attractive binary search target.

 

Also, I don't really understand u but it's weird in your pastebin output that final u is x+n diff/2.

Anonymous ID: e0502c March 23, 2018, 1:27 a.m. No.5265   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5266 >>5277 >>5354 >>5365

Weird, you're right. Not sure if it means anything but interesting. I took your list and re-did it with only LSB (least significant bits) and I'm thinking mirror rather than triangle… Triangle often has an odd element at the center, but these don't. Also, I boxed in with red zero values that I felt to be unexpected.

Anonymous ID: e0502c April 3, 2018, 12:25 a.m. No.5353   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5354 >>5406 >>5408

>>5348

This is awesome. How big of a number can you factor with about an hour’s worth of CPU time? I assume you’re single threaded right now and using a heavier-weight or scripting language. To me it appears to be the time to test the limits.

Anonymous ID: e0502c April 3, 2018, 2:08 a.m. No.5367   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5375

>>5358

Welcome back. There was speculation you were not doing well based on a /qresearch/ post. Are you doing well? I think I speak for all of us in that WE HOPE SO!!!!!

 

Please check in regularly, we worry about you.

Anonymous ID: e0502c April 5, 2018, 12:35 a.m. No.5450   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5454

>>5413

>From exponential complexity class (well, sub exponential with the general number field sieve) to the natural log of the length of the integer c in bits.

 

How would even/odd decision tree result in natural log? It would result in log2.

Anonymous ID: e0502c April 6, 2018, 12:40 a.m. No.5456   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5457 >>5466 >>5485

>>5454

I’m aware of that, which is why I found it odd that it was specifically “natural log” instead of just “log”. Either that was a typo and he meant log2, or I really have no idea what’s going on because I can’t think of anything that would specifically scale ln here.

 

>>5455

Yeah, that’s exactly what I’m thinking too. I could be way off here, but it’s my understanding that the reason this is called VQC in the first place is because a pre-existing virtual “data structure” kind of already exists in the universe that will factor any c. I’m thinking like a fractal of decision trees. You have to know where to start and what decisions to make, and walking this tree will lead you to the answer in log c time.

 

Sometimes when I’m talking to people, thry’re like “You can program? You must be so good at math.” And it drives me nuts because to me it’s not even remotely true. To me, math handicaps itself with its seeming insistence on having the entire program be one giant single expression, then having academic circlejerks about it for a few hundred years. When this whole thing started, it kind of resonated with me that there is unexplored structure in the numbers themselves and also a certain inherent decision-tree-ness that traditional approaches to math might not be interested in. Ok end of rant.

Anonymous ID: e0502c April 7, 2018, 2:28 a.m. No.5468   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5467

This seems to me to be exceedingly reasonable. I too was never clear on why to attempt to further break down e.

 

This root has two stalks.

!!ZkrDJ5XcPM ID: e0502c April 16, 2018, 12:20 a.m. No.5613   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5618

>>5609

 

>THEY’RE TURNING OUR FRICKIN’ COPRIMES GAY

 

Fortunately there’s no shortage of number theory whackjobs on the Internet, so until we factor a RSA challenge number, it’s probably not a huge concern. Fuck if somebody did manage to get on infowars it would probably be ne of the top two funniest things ever. Posting w/ trip for posterity.

Anonymous ID: e0502c April 16, 2018, 12:50 a.m. No.5615   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5616

>>5614

 

Hello. What particular part? You’re going to need to basically pour your soul out, talk about what you think you understand and what you think you don’t understand, then maybe we can help you.

Anonymous ID: e0502c April 18, 2018, 11:42 p.m. No.5638   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5639 >>5640

JFC why does every single human group endeavor inevitably become so incredibly fucking gay

 

I’m so deleriously tired of human beings. I mean I love you all, but this species has severe and debilitating issues that probably cannot be overcome without splitting into a new species altogether. It’s a miracle (and I mean literal miracle, as in God himself forcefully intervening) that anything at all ever gets accomplished, ever.

 

Sometimes you think, just for one second, that perhaps just this once this isn’t the case, some stupid human-caused derailment spontaneously appears out of the ether like matter/antimatter virtual particles in a vacuum.

 

I AM SO FUCKING SICK OF HUMANITY IN GENERAL REEEEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Anonymous ID: e0502c April 19, 2018, 4:12 a.m. No.5641   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5642 >>5644 >>5653

>>5640

>I wouldn't have a problem with it if [things not the case]

>it still really doesn't sit right with me having a less public communication channel [that already exists in wide usage]

>VQC's 8 days

>hope that he hasn't been murdered

>a life insurance emailing person

>the hope that he also hasn't gotten busy again

>he isn't having too hard of a time emotionally

 

I suppose this is why phrases like "darkest hour" exist. I'm not sure humans really deserve redemption at this point, honestly. Maybe God has other plans.

Anonymous ID: e0502c April 19, 2018, 4:36 a.m. No.5642   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5643 >>5644 >>5655

>>5641

 

Let me speak plainly: perhaps this is what niggers are always agitating about. The unspoken premise of society in general is "you can't really trust niggers", and this is for mostly good reasons. Hence, niggers should just be grateful for the drippings of fat that perchance fall into their mouths at random.

 

Here, we're the stupid niggers. VQC is the fat-dripper. I don't mean this in any fundamental negative way, but I'm calling out the truth as I see it. I see nothing to contradict my main thesis point. Feel free to educate me.

 

If VQC were acting in good faith, all he would have to do is keep to his public statements. However, it is a fact that he has not in fact kept to his public statements. Because I personally like him, and I have corresponded with him back and forth, it actually pains me that I have to actually say this. Especially since I am the "nigger" here.

 

The way I see it, VQC has some choices to make. If he is, in fact, Christian man du jour as claimed by himself in his Revelations analogies, avoidance of death is merely logistical and not otherwise fundamentally consequential. The Spirit's will would be the whole of the consequential. If that is in fact not the case, I for one would appreciate an update.

 

Also, from my nigger perspective, I see a VQC not always technically accurate– i.e., messing up f formulas, misspeaking about big-O complexity, and in general being sloppy with details to the extent that it seems to me to deliberately waste people's time. At this point I think PMA VQC in leading the charge to where this group is going. Plus PMA writes much better code than VQC.

 

OK, guys, let me have it. I'm sorry, I had to put this out there. The only thing you can't say about me is I haven't been here since the very beginning.

Anonymous ID: e0502c April 21, 2018, 1:59 a.m. No.5658   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5659 >>5661

Hey everyone. Sorry I was being a complete faggot a couple of nights ago. Sometimes humans and associated human chaos drive me nuts, particularly when I've been forced to deal with a lot of people-related bullshit in my own life, as I have recently. I'm sorry famalams. I love you all, I truly do.